14:00:38 <haleyb> #startmeeting neutron_drivers
14:00:38 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Fri Jul 19 14:00:38 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:38 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:38 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers'
14:00:39 <haleyb> Ping list: ykarel, mlavalle, mtomaska, slaweq, obondarev, tobias-urdin, lajoskatona, amotoki, haleyb, ralonsoh
14:00:47 <ralonsoh> hello!
14:00:53 <haleyb> not sure if we'll have enough people, let's see
14:00:57 <slaweq> hi
14:01:13 <ykarel> sorry couldn't joing, have to drop early today
14:01:41 <haleyb> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/2072505 is the only thing on agenda
14:02:05 <cbuggy> Hello o/
14:02:38 <haleyb> i added a comment earlier to see if Florian could join, don't know his nick
14:03:05 <slaweq> I already commented about what I am affraid of there
14:03:19 <slaweq> but generally I like the idea to give more power for users
14:05:03 <haleyb> slaweq: yes, checking more routers could be an issue
14:05:49 <obondarev> hi
14:06:55 <haleyb> does not look like we'll have quorum with people out today, I will just leave it on the agenda for next week
14:07:02 <ralonsoh> in other than OVN that could work, but I don't know for ML2/OVN
14:07:06 <slaweq> but with simple "--force" flag passed to the api that would be fast
14:07:10 <haleyb> i will not be here next week
14:07:41 <slaweq> and that would mean that user knows what is doing - this can be by default only for the admin (and maybe manager) user, not for members
14:07:44 <ralonsoh> what happens in the FIP assignation, so if OVN cannot route this packet, what happens
14:10:11 <ralonsoh> so in order to give a +1 to this RFE, I would like first an spec describing how this will be done in ML2/OVS and ML2/OVN
14:11:50 <haleyb> ralonsoh: i can add that ask to the bug
14:11:52 <obondarev> with DVR floating IP traffic does not go through router namespace but directly from a compute node (fip namespace) so this is a concern as well - the "gateway" server might be skipped
14:12:06 <ralonsoh> right
14:12:09 <slaweq> that is good idea ralonsoh
14:12:20 <ralonsoh> this dvr node must have connectivity to the gateway
14:12:45 <ralonsoh> so, IMO, this idea has designed for a limited scenario
14:12:51 <obondarev> +1
14:15:24 <ralonsoh> ok, I think for now the idea is to ask for more information about the scenario, implementation and backedns
14:15:53 <haleyb> yes. i will add some questions and put a link to this discussion in the bug
14:16:09 <haleyb> any other driver things to discuss?
14:16:15 <ralonsoh> not from me
14:16:39 <slaweq> nope
14:17:02 <haleyb> #endmeeting