15:02:58 #startmeeting neutron_dvr 15:02:59 Meeting started Wed Mar 23 15:02:58 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:03:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:03:03 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_dvr' 15:03:08 #chair Swami 15:03:09 Current chairs: Swami haleyb 15:03:20 #topic Announcements 15:03:58 Only thing I had was that RC1 is cut, RC2 probable from what I've seen 15:04:19 Did we have anything we need to target at RC2 ? 15:04:28 yes 15:04:35 one sec 15:04:35 I just saw a bug that jschwarz_ has filed 15:04:56 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1560945 15:04:57 Launchpad bug 1560945 in neutron "Unable to create DVR+HA routers" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to John Schwarz (jschwarz) 15:05:08 also probably if the fixed ip patch gets into good shape that would be a good candidate . 15:05:28 I'm looking for armax to get his attention to see if this is an RC blocker 15:05:42 being pedantic lets jump to bugs 15:05:45 #topic Bugs 15:05:46 I have a patch for this but it was just something in cooked up in 2 seconds, so reviews will be very helpful 15:05:53 haleyb: thanks 15:06:09 This week we have seen just this one bug that jschwarz_ posted. 15:06:11 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/296394/ 15:06:18 jschwarz_: this looks like an rc candidate 15:06:22 we can talk about jschwarz_ first 15:06:28 :) 15:06:29 that was the review, right? 15:06:35 haleyb: yes 15:07:04 jschwarz_: please add a test, this someone crept in as a demonstration of the fact that perhaps we don’t have stellar covereage 15:07:07 coverage 15:07:16 I was also looking for documentation in this area 15:07:24 being nitpicky, can we just put a better description in the commit message too? 15:07:25 and I have seen none so far 15:07:33 armax, will do. I'll be in touch with the people once I do 15:07:40 armax: documentation is on its way, adolfo is working on it, he might post a patch 15:07:46 might? 15:07:48 oh boy 15:08:01 haleyb, yes 15:08:02 jschwarz_: btw time is running out 15:08:09 s/might/will 15:08:13 armax, when do we want the RC to be cut? 15:08:19 I think we had today at latest 15:08:23 armax: yes he will post a patch. 15:08:33 armax, it's at the top of my list, then 15:08:43 armax: will make sure that gets into the review queue today. 15:08:44 I need to touch base with sc68cal too if he wants https://review.openstack.org/#/c/295917/ in 15:08:48 but that’s a separate topic 15:09:00 jschwarz_: thanks for testing this 15:09:05 welcome 15:09:29 btw jschwarz_ you sure that this happens on rc1 too? 15:09:41 armax, I tested on upstream master 15:09:44 I can make sure 15:10:02 I assume the two not to be radically different, but it’d be nice to see where the regression came from or if anyone can confirm why this is happening 15:10:23 once I'll have the next revision I'll bisect to see 15:10:34 it was working fine a few months back when we first introduced the DVRHA routers 15:11:15 was it introduced recently then 15:11:17 jschwarz_: that would be awesome 15:11:57 I'll start working on this now then and be in touch once I have results 15:12:01 * jschwarz switched PCs 15:12:22 jschwarz: thanks 15:12:38 This the only new bug we had this week. 15:13:08 The next one is the #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1462154 15:13:10 Launchpad bug 1462154 in neutron "With DVR Pings to floating IPs replied with fixed-ips if VMs are on the same network" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan) 15:13:10 jschwarz: thanks for fixing, ping when you have a new review out 15:13:31 This one has a patch from Xiao 15:13:47 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285982/ 15:13:56 haleyb: I think you have already reviewed it. 15:14:57 I did test this patch and it seems to work. 15:15:27 Swami: yes, that one loop didn't look right, although it probably works just fine since there is a port there if a FIP is present 15:15:59 but a slight refactor would make it more solid 15:16:02 haleyb: yes I agree with you comment. 15:16:30 haleyb: makes sense 15:16:39 is Xiao around? 15:16:59 haleyb: I don't think he is 15:17:39 Swami: if you're fine with my change in the comment i'll update since it's been 19 hours with no movement 15:18:14 haleyb: I think I am ok with your comment, just push in your version, I can test it and then we can push it. 15:18:33 @action haleyb to update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285982/ based on his comments 15:18:38 doh 15:18:46 #action haleyb to update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/285982/ based on his comments 15:19:18 Swami: so what about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/246855/ ? that's also linked to that bug 15:20:06 haleyb: no that is not in a good shape and is not required anymore if this goes in. 15:20:19 ah, i see carl_baldwin 's comment "This will not merge!" so will -1 workflow it 15:20:54 What'd I do? 15:21:30 carl_baldwin: nothing, i just noticed your comment in a review 15:21:46 "This will not merge!" :) 15:22:26 two competing patches to fix bug 1462154 15:22:27 bug 1462154 in neutron "With DVR Pings to floating IPs replied with fixed-ips if VMs are on the same network" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1462154 - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan) 15:23:08 haleyb: Right, but the depends-on was removed. 15:23:22 haleyb: It was the depends-on that I said would never merge. 15:23:57 doh again 15:24:57 I dont' any other new bugs to discuss. 15:25:38 anyone else have any bugs? 15:26:14 #topic Gate Failures 15:26:39 I do see that the multinode jobs failing rate is high 15:26:53 https://goo.gl/L1WODG is showing the multinode job failure at 40-50% 15:27:21 This spiked starting 3/21 15:27:51 I did see there were bunch of failures with respect to "volume_boot_pattern" yesterday. 15:29:04 Is that a nova or cinder thing? 15:29:25 I am not sure 15:30:54 I will look through some recent jobs and look for failures in the logs, but anyone else that wants to help is welcome 15:31:19 haleyb: thanks 15:31:45 haleyb: there might be more failures, but this is the one I noticed were it had 800 to 900 failures 15:31:59 obviously the plan is to get these jobs voting again, but they haven't been stable for more than a week 15:32:14 haleyb: Yes, that was our plan. 15:32:20 Swami: logstash? maybe i'll start there 15:32:47 haleyb: yes 15:32:56 the numbers that i provided was from logstash 15:34:24 #topic Open Discussion 15:34:54 if there are no other issues i'll give people 25 minutes back 15:35:15 haleyb: I think we don't have any other topics to discuss at this time. 15:36:08 ok, let's try and get that DVR+HA fix and the SNAT fix in 15:36:22 haleyb: sure 15:36:32 thanks for coming everyone 15:36:34 also I will make sure we have the HA docs up 15:36:50 #endmeeting