15:00:38 #startmeeting neutron_dvr 15:00:46 Meeting started Wed Mar 22 15:00:38 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:48 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:51 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_dvr' 15:01:27 #chair Swami 15:01:28 Current chairs: Swami haleyb 15:01:46 haleyb: Sorry, I was not able to focus much on upstream last couple of weeks. Probably everything should be ok in the coming weeks. 15:02:13 Swami: sorry for missing last week, was on a plane and forgot to text you. 15:02:32 I have been busy as well, but getting back to normal I hope 15:02:36 haleyb: no problem, last week I joined the meeting early and then waited to quit. 15:03:00 they're aren't many lurkers anymore :( 15:03:19 haleyb: I may not have much update this week to share, just to let you know. 15:03:43 me either 15:04:04 let's just do bugs then 15:04:07 #topic Bugs 15:04:14 haleyb: ok 15:05:11 There are two bugs that have not be triaged. 15:05:44 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1672345 15:05:46 Launchpad bug 1672345 in neutron "Loadbalancer V2 ports are not serviced by DVR" [Undecided,New] 15:06:04 i saw you asked for some more info, might be a dup 15:06:19 This one seems to be like the 'floatingip' to unbound port with DVR 15:06:47 It may be the same, but still we need to triage this if there is anything else with the LBaaS that is not working right with DVR 15:07:10 i noticed oleg had a new patch for this, right? let me find it 15:07:29 haleyb: I am not aware. 15:07:48 Was this for the allowed_address_pair fix 15:08:09 https://review.openstack.org/448084 was for the floating ip with aa-pairs 15:08:51 so i think it was related by having those special-case FIP ports be on the snat node 15:10:22 Yes it seems that he has made some changes to the agent side code to reuse the legacy router functions to handle the floating ip, but with the snat namespace, rather than code duplication. 15:10:45 it's not complete, but a start 15:10:45 haleyb: that looks simple than mine. 15:11:06 i don't see him online or i'd ping him 15:11:35 haleyb: Let me take a look at that and see if it can be reused in my agent code, since I have tested mine. 15:12:10 ok 15:12:27 The next one that has not been triaged yet is #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1657981 15:12:27 Launchpad bug 1657981 in neutron "FloatingIPs not reachable after restart of compute node (DVR)" [Undecided,New] 15:12:58 I will triage this and will update the bug. 15:13:56 could be the agent is started before something else is up, don't know 15:14:31 haleyb: yes, I need to retest this scenario in master to make sure if something is broken there. 15:15:52 haleyb: There was bug related to the OVS flows not cleaned up properly, do you know if that one got fixed. 15:17:22 Swami: i think so, i had cleaned the wiki 30 minutes ago (actually see i broke the formatting) 15:17:49 was it bug 1583694 ? 15:17:49 bug 1583694 in neutron "[RFE] DVR support for Allowed_address_pair port that are bound to multiple ACTIVE VM ports" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1583694 - Assigned to Oleg Bondarev (obondarev) 15:17:58 oops, bad paste 15:18:24 bug 1668277 15:18:24 bug 1668277 in neutron "When enable l2pop, after deleting the DVR port, the associated flow entries still exists." [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1668277 - Assigned to Yaohua Yan (sleepdream) 15:18:25 haleyb: ok, no problem. 15:18:36 haleyb: thanks 15:19:13 haleyb: those were the only outstanding bugs that is not being triaged. 15:19:33 haleyb: Need some reviews on the "Fast path exit" patches. 15:20:08 Swami: yes, i will get to that this week 15:21:04 #topic Open Discussion 15:21:53 the DVR+HA job is close to merging, let me link it 15:22:04 haleyb: ok, that is good news. 15:22:34 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383827/ - the change to set the environment 15:22:37 haleyb: So once it merges then we can make that job voting or should we wait for a couple of months to monitor the stability and make it voting. 15:24:13 yes, we can watch for a bit. i couldn't find the infra change (if there was one) 15:24:59 haleyb: Are you back in boston from NC 15:25:26 Swami: yes, i am back, wasn't as warm as i would have expected :) 15:25:43 haleyb: I will be attending the boston summit 15:26:05 Swami: I was just going to ask since I saw our topic was accepted 15:26:12 haleyb: Let me put together a slide deck for our presentation, sometime closer. 15:26:34 Yes, maybe it can just be on google docs so we can work on it together 15:26:50 haleyb: yes, will start it in google docs. 15:27:39 I am not sure if i'll be there the whole week, or just for the talk, need to work on that 15:28:00 haleyb: are you taking time off during that week. 15:29:30 Swami: I haven't yet, I just didn't know if i'd get hotel approval which makes it easier, but i have the free ticket so will be there as much as possible otherwise 15:29:52 haleyb: Oh! got it. 15:30:23 haleyb: I haven't booked my hotel yet. I am not sure which hotel is the closest. 15:31:13 the closest is full, i booked a room at the sheraton that i can cancel 15:31:21 it's pretty close 15:31:41 haleyb: yes I saw a couple of hotels already sold out. 15:32:05 it's not cheap, like $300 a day 15:32:26 haleyb: that is high 15:32:43 it is boston... 15:33:14 haleyb: is this the community negotiated price. 15:33:18 looking forward to seeing you and any other neutrinos 15:33:28 haleyb: sure, see you soon. 15:33:49 the sheraton rate was, there might be other cheaper options further from the meeting 15:34:11 anything else? otherwise i'll get back to reviews and such 15:34:29 haleyb: I don't have anything more to discuss. 15:34:30 ^^ this is the chance for lurkers ^^ :) 15:34:50 #endmeeting