13:59:24 <sc68cal> #startmeeting neutron_ipv6
13:59:25 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Apr 22 13:59:24 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:59:26 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:59:28 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6'
13:59:37 <sc68cal> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_April_21st Agenda for today
13:59:50 <sc68cal> #topic blueprints
14:00:00 <baoli> hi
14:00:22 <sc68cal> #announcement Neutron-Specs is up and active, all blueprints for Juno release must follow the new git based workflow
14:00:51 <absubram> hi
14:01:11 <sc68cal> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Neutron Information about the new blueprint process
14:01:56 <baoli> I need to start working on the specs soon.
14:02:19 <sc68cal> yes - I saw a couple blueprints you added to the agenda exist in launchpad
14:03:32 <baoli> I haven't had time to put more details in them.
14:05:30 <sc68cal> OK. We should also take the blueprints for the dnsmasq work and put them in
14:05:56 <sc68cal> Either as one big blueprint or possibly as multiple blueprints - I'm thinking maybe multiple blueprints (since they already are multiple BPs)
14:06:18 <sc68cal> and hopefully that will help break up the big patch that shixiong has
14:06:26 <sc68cal> into more managable chunks
14:06:39 <xuhanp> sc68cal, I will work on the security group related BP soon.
14:07:23 <sc68cal> refresh my memory about that one? I thought you got everything merged? or do you mean the work for triggering security group refreshing?
14:07:47 <xuhanp> there are some egress rule, spoofing stuff as well
14:08:08 <sc68cal> OK - cool!
14:08:15 <xuhanp> and the discussion you have with baoli about the LLA and router interface
14:08:37 <xuhanp> I think we still need to figure out them
14:10:35 <sc68cal> OK - do we have anything else to discuss, related to BPs?
14:11:08 <sc68cal> #topic code reviews
14:11:29 <sc68cal> baoli: think you had some stuff on the agenda
14:11:37 <baoli> sc68cal, regarding the radvd BP, I put some of my thoughts in the whiteboard
14:12:46 <sc68cal> ok - the problem with the whiteboard is it's sometimes hard to follow - we may have to forklift your concerns into the new bp
14:13:42 <baoli> which new bp?
14:13:57 <sc68cal> the one we'll have to create for the radvd stuff
14:15:08 <sc68cal> otherwise looks like you have the SNAT rules for ipv4 only in hand, just a couple nits to address.
14:15:09 <baoli> So you want to create a new BP for that, not using the existing one?
14:15:42 <sc68cal> Can't use any existing blueprints in launchpad - all work for Juno must have a bp in neutron-specs
14:16:20 <baoli> sc68cal, I thought that we have to have a bp in launchpad anyway?
14:17:15 <sc68cal> baoli: you are correct - just checked the wiki, yes you must have it in launchpad, then something in neutron-specs. Sorry for the mistake
14:18:18 <baoli> sc68cal, no problem. So in the specs, we'll refer to the bp
14:18:58 <sc68cal> Yeah, although I think the BPs in launchpad will be pretty light on detail, and the specs will be heavy on detail
14:19:10 <baoli> sc68cal, I agree
14:20:24 <sc68cal> baoli: I moved some of your agenda items from bugs to code review, since they're links to gerrit. Does anyone want to discuss them?
14:20:39 <baoli> sc68cal, thanks
14:21:08 <sc68cal> I think the only thing I have to say about the devstack one is possibly break it into pieces, which I put in my review comments. Otherwise looks good for both the devstack and SNAT patch
14:21:46 <baoli> sc68cal, I'll give it a try for the next submission
14:22:45 <sc68cal> any other code reviews? otherwise we'll go to bugs, then to open discussion
14:23:36 <jay-lau-513> dansmith ping
14:23:57 <sc68cal> #topic bugs
14:24:34 <sc68cal> Nothing was on the agenda for this - so we can continue right to open discussion if nobody has anything
14:25:25 <sc68cal> #topic open discussion
14:26:16 <sc68cal> So I put together an etherpad for the design summit session - to put together at least a couple topics to discuss - feel free to edit - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-ipv6-atlanta-summit
14:26:44 <sc68cal> Currently they are oversubscribed on summit sessions to available slots, by like 2.5:1
14:27:05 <fifieldt> just want to say thanks to you all for the huge effort during icehouse with ipv6 - was awesome to see
14:27:16 <sc68cal> :)
14:27:30 <baoli> sc68cal, thanks for opening the etherpad. I'll add some stuff soon
14:29:17 <sc68cal> Pretty light day today, so if there isn't anything else I can give everyone back half an hour
14:30:00 <sc68cal> fifieldt: thanks for the praise - I agree - everyone did a fantastic job this cycle, especially since we have no cores on the subteam and it was all community driven
14:30:36 <xuhanp> agreed. Great team to work with! :-)
14:31:29 <sc68cal> Alrighty then, if there are no objections, we'll meet next week!
14:32:08 <sc68cal> #endmeeting