13:59:24 #startmeeting neutron_ipv6 13:59:25 Meeting started Tue Apr 22 13:59:24 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:59:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:59:28 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6' 13:59:37 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam#Agenda_for_April_21st Agenda for today 13:59:50 #topic blueprints 14:00:00 hi 14:00:22 #announcement Neutron-Specs is up and active, all blueprints for Juno release must follow the new git based workflow 14:00:51 hi 14:01:11 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Neutron Information about the new blueprint process 14:01:56 I need to start working on the specs soon. 14:02:19 yes - I saw a couple blueprints you added to the agenda exist in launchpad 14:03:32 I haven't had time to put more details in them. 14:05:30 OK. We should also take the blueprints for the dnsmasq work and put them in 14:05:56 Either as one big blueprint or possibly as multiple blueprints - I'm thinking maybe multiple blueprints (since they already are multiple BPs) 14:06:18 and hopefully that will help break up the big patch that shixiong has 14:06:26 into more managable chunks 14:06:39 sc68cal, I will work on the security group related BP soon. 14:07:23 refresh my memory about that one? I thought you got everything merged? or do you mean the work for triggering security group refreshing? 14:07:47 there are some egress rule, spoofing stuff as well 14:08:08 OK - cool! 14:08:15 and the discussion you have with baoli about the LLA and router interface 14:08:37 I think we still need to figure out them 14:10:35 OK - do we have anything else to discuss, related to BPs? 14:11:08 #topic code reviews 14:11:29 baoli: think you had some stuff on the agenda 14:11:37 sc68cal, regarding the radvd BP, I put some of my thoughts in the whiteboard 14:12:46 ok - the problem with the whiteboard is it's sometimes hard to follow - we may have to forklift your concerns into the new bp 14:13:42 which new bp? 14:13:57 the one we'll have to create for the radvd stuff 14:15:08 otherwise looks like you have the SNAT rules for ipv4 only in hand, just a couple nits to address. 14:15:09 So you want to create a new BP for that, not using the existing one? 14:15:42 Can't use any existing blueprints in launchpad - all work for Juno must have a bp in neutron-specs 14:16:20 sc68cal, I thought that we have to have a bp in launchpad anyway? 14:17:15 baoli: you are correct - just checked the wiki, yes you must have it in launchpad, then something in neutron-specs. Sorry for the mistake 14:18:18 sc68cal, no problem. So in the specs, we'll refer to the bp 14:18:58 Yeah, although I think the BPs in launchpad will be pretty light on detail, and the specs will be heavy on detail 14:19:10 sc68cal, I agree 14:20:24 baoli: I moved some of your agenda items from bugs to code review, since they're links to gerrit. Does anyone want to discuss them? 14:20:39 sc68cal, thanks 14:21:08 I think the only thing I have to say about the devstack one is possibly break it into pieces, which I put in my review comments. Otherwise looks good for both the devstack and SNAT patch 14:21:46 sc68cal, I'll give it a try for the next submission 14:22:45 any other code reviews? otherwise we'll go to bugs, then to open discussion 14:23:36 dansmith ping 14:23:57 #topic bugs 14:24:34 Nothing was on the agenda for this - so we can continue right to open discussion if nobody has anything 14:25:25 #topic open discussion 14:26:16 So I put together an etherpad for the design summit session - to put together at least a couple topics to discuss - feel free to edit - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-ipv6-atlanta-summit 14:26:44 Currently they are oversubscribed on summit sessions to available slots, by like 2.5:1 14:27:05 just want to say thanks to you all for the huge effort during icehouse with ipv6 - was awesome to see 14:27:16 :) 14:27:30 sc68cal, thanks for opening the etherpad. I'll add some stuff soon 14:29:17 Pretty light day today, so if there isn't anything else I can give everyone back half an hour 14:30:00 fifieldt: thanks for the praise - I agree - everyone did a fantastic job this cycle, especially since we have no cores on the subteam and it was all community driven 14:30:36 agreed. Great team to work with! :-) 14:31:29 Alrighty then, if there are no objections, we'll meet next week! 14:32:08 #endmeeting