14:02:57 <sc68cal> #startmeeting neutron_ipv6
14:02:58 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul 29 14:02:57 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:02:58 <xuhanp> hello
14:02:59 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:03:01 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6'
14:03:05 <BrianB__> hi
14:04:36 <sc68cal> So the radvd support landed last week, and we got a feature freeze exception for stateful/stateless support
14:05:39 <carlp> excellent!
14:06:11 <sc68cal> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/106299/ stateful/stateless support
14:06:47 <xuhanp> We got some feedback for the mini version of dnsmasq
14:07:25 <xuhanp> Do you guys think we should no longer support version < 2.63 ?
14:07:45 <sc68cal> xuhanp: I think 2.63 is now the minimum version that neutron will support
14:07:51 <xuhanp> by not support I mean exit the program when version <2.63
14:08:13 <xuhanp> right now it's a warning without exiting.
14:09:11 <sc68cal> Really? hmm - yeah it should be exiting if not 2.63 or greater
14:09:51 <sc68cal> https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/5fd147e5371f14aeb3cfe9da244093d1190b5614
14:10:02 <xuhanp> ok. that will make the code much clearer
14:10:35 <xuhanp> there was a commit which was trying to support dnsmasq on RH6.4
14:10:47 <xuhanp> which is 2.48 if I remember that correctly.
14:10:59 * sc68cal barfs
14:11:11 <sc68cal> that's ancient
14:11:22 <xuhanp> yep.
14:12:02 <sc68cal> Let's start a thread on the ML so we can get input from cores, but yeah to my mind it's gotta be at least 2.63 for ipv6 support
14:12:37 <xuhanp> Sure. will send out the email soon
14:13:02 <sc68cal> xuhanp: thanks
14:14:05 <sc68cal> HenryG: I see you've got a patch to fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1345341
14:14:06 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1345341 in neutron "radvd needs functional tests" [High,In progress]
14:14:54 <HenryG> yes, I need Maru's eyes on it
14:15:14 <HenryG> Also the devstack patch needs to go upstream first
14:16:24 <sc68cal> This devstack patch? https://review.openstack.org/107801
14:17:54 <HenryG> yup
14:18:49 <sc68cal> HenryG: ok
14:20:13 <sc68cal> Are there any other high priority items that I have missed?
14:22:58 <amotoki> hi  i would like to add IPv6 related fields to horizon.
14:22:59 <sc68cal> looks like we got the python-neutronclient changes merge
14:23:42 <amotoki> It must be small, but there are valid combinations for ipv6 two modes and I need to investigate valid combinations. any pointers?
14:24:04 <sc68cal> amotoki: there is a BP that was registered for horizon
14:24:07 <sc68cal> amotoki: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/neutron-subnet-mode-support
14:24:13 <aveiga> amotoki: the valid mode combinations are already listed in the API spec
14:24:18 <aveiga> there's a table in there
14:24:54 <amotoki> sc68cal: oh I remember. perhaps I reviewd several months ago.
14:25:35 <amotoki> sc68cal: my question is valid combinations depend on deployment or all combo are valid for all deployments?
14:26:06 <sc68cal> amotoki: all valid combos are valid for all deployments
14:27:03 <amotoki> sc68cal: thanks for your help. It really helps me when reviewing horizon code.
14:27:29 <amotoki> I need to moving it forward.
14:27:50 <sc68cal> amotoki: cool, thanks
14:31:27 <sc68cal> Do we have any other business to discuss?
14:33:46 <sc68cal> OK- I'll be in #openstack-neutron if anyone needs me, and the mailing list. I'll give back 30 minutes to everyone
14:33:54 <sc68cal> #endmeeting