14:06:18 #startmeeting neutron_ipv6 14:06:19 Meeting started Tue Aug 19 14:06:18 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:06:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:06:22 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6' 14:06:26 hello 14:06:40 xuhanp: hello! 14:07:38 o/ 14:08:44 xuhanp: I saw the comments on your review, regarding the NEC CI system 14:09:12 sc68cal, yep. got some comments about dnsmasq version check 14:10:15 and seems the nec CI has been fixed already: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/106299/ 14:11:04 agree - looks like we're ready to merge 14:11:51 The complaint was that Ubuntu 12.04 has some old version of dnsmasq. But can't that be fixed with apt-get install update? 14:12:13 Maybe I misunderstand operations issues. 14:12:36 Most likely the cloud-archive will need to have a newer version of dnsmasq 14:12:46 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive 14:13:04 we deploy on 12.04 and utilize 14:14:25 Isn't zigo the person to help us out there? 14:14:39 Hi! 14:14:44 How may I help? :) 14:14:59 With dnsmasq? 14:15:01 zigo: hi 14:15:06 no, zigo packages for debian I believe 14:15:26 I did forward him the e-mail as a heads up 14:15:32 hi, according to the log, it seems you are talking about dnsmasq versoin. 14:15:42 http://archive.gplhost.com/debian/pool/juno-backports/main/d/dnsmasq/ 14:15:45 It's there already. 14:15:48 amotoki: yes 14:16:09 amotoki, thanks for removing your -1 and fixing the Nec CI 14:16:15 Then there's someone working on an official Debian Wheezy backport (as per a debian-backport@lists.debian.org post). 14:16:47 But I believe you need it for Ubuntu 12.04 ? 14:16:53 Or for what? 14:17:31 FYI, I do Debian stuff, I have no power to do anything on cloud-archive ... 14:17:50 sorry zigo :( 14:17:52 I think Ubuntu Cloud Archive does not support Juno on 12.04. 14:18:16 amotoki: That is correct. And the plan is to *not* support it. Same for my Juno packages btw. 14:18:54 Both Canonical guys and myself did some Precise packages because of customers needs, but at some point, they are required to upgrade to 14.04. 14:18:58 amotoki: I believe you are correct. 12.04 is going to stay on Icehouse I think. 14:19:35 It's actually a pain to do all the backporting work (not only Python modules, but also all stuff like kernel, OVS, etc.). 14:19:40 guess everyone who wants OpenStack and ipv6 will have to upgrade to 14.04 too :( 14:20:05 sc68cal: Or switch to Debian? :) 14:20:20 sc68cal: precisely speaking, everyone who wants to use dhcp-agent in Juno needs to upgrade to 14.04. 14:21:00 zigo: hahaha yes, or switch to debian :) 14:21:12 :) 14:22:41 I might need to bring this topic up in the infra meeting or 3rd party CI 14:22:57 since people might be using 12.04 for CI systems like NEC does 14:23:53 Actually I built dnsmasq package from ubuntu and put my local repo. NEC CI picks dnsmasq from there. 14:25:17 amotoki: true, that is one way to fix :) we'll just need to give everyone a lot of warning about this 14:25:48 The thing we need to bring up is that neutron CI requires Ubuntu 14.04 (12.04 no longer works with customized package). 14:26:02 agree 14:26:38 I honestly wonder why other CI's didn't break. They all use ubuntu 14.04 or Redhat variants.... 14:26:38 I'll add a reminder for myself to bring this up in the main neutron meeting 14:26:52 sc68cal: good idea. 14:27:21 I know our CI has switched to 14.04 14:27:53 sc68cal: that is what the #action thing is for :) 14:28:05 kyle and mark already agree with the direction on dev ML, so it must be just a notice. 14:28:36 HenryG: agree - 14:28:53 #action sc68cal report dnsmasq 2.63 requirement for dhcp-agent in the weekly neutron meeting 14:29:14 I think you need to be chair for it to stick 14:29:21 so excuse the copy and paste :) 14:29:25 #action sc68cal report dnsmasq 2.63 requirement for dhcp-agent in the weekly neutron meeting 14:29:54 So while we have amotoki here ... 14:30:20 Can we talk about IPv6 in Horizon? 14:30:27 sure 14:30:34 go for it ;) 14:30:38 * HenryG searches for the review ... 14:31:20 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74453/ ? 14:31:31 https://review.openstack.org/74453 14:31:34 yes 14:33:09 So mainly I want to bring attention to the review because most of us don't go looking outside neutron much. 14:33:34 Please review it. At least the parts that you recognize. 14:33:46 +1 14:33:57 One question I have about it ... 14:34:04 The easiest way is just to run the review :-) 14:34:36 Do we want to expose the raw attribute names in the UI? 14:35:13 Or give them "English" labels instead? "IPv6 RA Mode" etc? 14:35:40 s/English/Localized/g 14:35:43 What I concern is ipv6 ra and address modes have a lot of constraints. there are 10 combos 14:35:55 my idea is just to make them dropdown list. 14:36:30 amotoki: yes, and markmcclain has plans to tweak the attributes to avoid that 14:36:58 or abishek is doing in antother approach. I can implement my idea so that you can test it. 14:37:20 i feel same as markmcclain :-) 14:37:55 do we have a spec for the tweaking of attributes? 14:38:33 HenryG: do you see any? 14:39:04 sc68cal: I have not seen a spec yet, only some doodling on a whiteboard at the midcycle 14:39:48 Given how much other stuff markmcclain has on his plate, I don't expect anything before kilo 14:40:30 ok 14:41:05 What I may do is take the doodles and draft something, then run it by markmcclain to see if he will allow me to post the spec 14:41:19 I would like to implement the dropdown menu version of Horizon support. It will be appreciated if you feedback on it and suggest better lablings :-) 14:41:26 i will talk with abishek on it. 14:41:36 amotoki: dropdown sounds reasonable to me 14:41:49 amotoki: Have you posted a review yet? 14:42:09 HenryG: not yet. will be avaialble in a couple of days. 14:42:26 amotoki: sounds good. Add me as reviewer so I see it 14:42:26 HenryG: ok. I'll try and keep an open mind. But I'm sort of exhausted by the API debate 14:42:40 We seem to have it every cycle.... 14:44:19 sc68cal: Don't worry, it's not really changing any of the work we have achieved. 14:45:01 BTW, does the list in neutron meeting wiki cover all pending reviews related to IPv6? I am not a specialist of IPv6 but i can. 14:46:09 yes it usually has a up to date list. 14:46:52 thanks 14:47:48 sc68cal: Not sure what else is on the agenda, but we should point out the bug list. 14:47:53 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.tag=ipv6 14:48:08 Several new bugs have been filed. 14:49:14 thanks f 14:49:18 *for the reminder 14:57:26 if there isn't anything else, I'll see everyone next week! 14:58:22 #endmeeting