15:01:04 #startmeeting neutron_ipv6 15:01:05 Meeting started Tue Feb 3 15:01:04 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:09 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6' 15:01:42 o/ 15:02:53 #info Kilo-2 is this week 15:04:10 Xu Han's dhcp options bp is scheduled for K-2 so please review - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136713/ 15:04:52 sc68cal: I can have a look at that today. 15:05:23 If you have things slated for K-3, please make sure you have posted it for review in gerrit, even if it still needs work 15:05:47 I am currently reviewing it 15:06:47 HenryG: I’ll leave you to it. Just needs one more core review. 15:09:14 #topic bugs 15:09:38 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.tag=ipv6&orderby=status&start=0 IPv6 bugs 15:09:48 * ihrachyshka is late 15:11:46 Anyone have bugs they'd like to discuss? 15:12:39 https://review.openstack.org/144630 15:12:45 I guess it's ready to merge 15:14:10 also, extra dhcp options for stateless subnets are not working: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147455/ again, the patch looks like ready for merge. 15:14:32 so, anyone with +2 hammer, please take a look at those two :) 15:15:33 ihrachyshka: I started reviewing 147455 yesterday. 15:15:43 I can finish the review today. 15:15:51 thanks 15:17:40 very cool 15:17:50 thanks ihrachyshka 15:18:21 #topic code review 15:18:46 Sort of covered this, but usually this topic is good for people who have patches that need attention :) 15:20:23 if nobody has anything I'll turn it over to open discussion :) 15:21:19 carl_baldwin: a question on the subnet allocation 15:21:53 carl_baldwin: do you plan to make changes to the subnet CLI/API? Is there going to be change in the subnet db model? 15:22:41 The reason I'm asking is that the PD may need to change them as well, so some potential overlap may exist. 15:23:36 baoli: Yes, all of those. 15:24:07 carl_baldwin: has the exact change been nailed down and can be shared? 15:24:07 I’ve had discussions with Dane and HenryG about how this fits with PD. 15:24:51 baoli: The spec has a decent amount of the detail in it. Beyond that, rtidwell, the owner of the implementation can help you with details. 15:25:17 carl_baldwin: cool. 15:25:38 baoli: I’m mobile at the moment but could discuss more a bit later. 15:26:50 hi 15:27:17 baoli: Basically, one of the key decisions was that PD would generate a uuid for subnet pool just for PD. Subnet allocation would not recognize that pool id but would just leave it alone. 15:27:59 #topic open discussion 15:28:06 don't mind me 15:28:29 carl_baldwin: that sounds like a plan 15:29:10 This was described in the PD blueprint, though it might have been a little vague 15:30:40 carl_baldwin: we'd have a situation in whcih a port should be allowed to be created on a subnet which CIDR is not available yet. Would subnet allocation address this? Or PD should address it? 15:31:29 baoli: Can we discuss after the top of the hour? 15:31:43 carl_baldwin: sure, on the same IRC channel? 15:32:47 carl_baldwin: you can ping me on IRC later. 15:33:37 baoli: I will ping you in openstack-neutron 15:33:56 carl_baldwin: thanks 15:34:38 thanks carl_baldwin :) 15:37:29 unless there's anything to discuss i'll give everyone back 20 minutes 15:37:55 might be good to take the DB/API cahnge talk over to #openstack-neutron anyway 15:40:15 ok everyone, thanks for coming - I know this is a crazy week due to K-2, see everyone next week! 15:40:21 #endmeeting