15:01:51 <sc68cal> #startmeeting neutron_ipv6
15:01:52 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Mar 31 15:01:51 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:01:54 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:01:56 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6'
15:02:19 <HenryG> o/
15:03:17 <SridharG> o/
15:03:30 <dboik> \o
15:03:42 <dane_leblanc> o/
15:03:45 <sc68cal> Was happy to see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149068/ get merged, along with the other patchsets in that series
15:04:03 <sc68cal> nice work everyone
15:04:54 <sc68cal> hmm looks like I'm a bit ahead of myself, looking at the deps
15:05:36 <sc68cal> patches from andrew boik are still inflight
15:06:44 <sc68cal> I don't have much to discuss today since we're in the RC phase and I've been doing a lot of doc stuff, so I'll let folks drive the agenda for the meeting, if they have things they want to discuss
15:09:03 <sc68cal> before I do that, I do want to see if people want to do a straw poll about wrapping up the subteam - if this working group is still useful or if we should look to try and merge with another subteam, like carl_baldwin 's l3 group
15:11:05 * haleyb hears crickets
15:11:31 <dane_leblanc> That might depend on how many IPv6 blueprints will be accepted for Liberty, I suppose.
15:12:04 <carl_baldwin> dane_leblanc: +1
15:12:20 <dboik> +1
15:12:25 <SridharG> +1
15:12:46 <sc68cal> dane_leblanc: good point
15:16:09 <sc68cal> Do we have any business to discuss today? That's all I had
15:17:38 <SridharG> sc68cal: I want to discuss about keepalived version
15:17:49 <SridharG> I'm looking into IPv6 support for L3 HA and noticed that we need keepalived version 1.2.10
15:17:58 <SridharG> Assaf had a look at the keepalived version in various distros and commented his observations at the following patch - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168781/4//COMMIT_MSG
15:18:33 <SridharG> Ubuntu 14.04 seems to be using an old version of keepalived and needs to be updated to version 1.2.10
15:19:09 <SridharG> I wanted to use this as a medium to share to the team about the Keepalived version that is required for IPv6 support
15:20:06 <SridharG> and also to know if someone in the team can package an updated version of keepalived for Ubuntu 14.04?
15:20:36 <sc68cal> SridharG: thanks for looking into it - nice work
15:20:53 <sc68cal> We might just be able to ping whoever the maintainer of the package is and ask them to bump
15:21:20 <sc68cal> either that or the ubuntu server team that manages the cloud archive - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/CloudArchive
15:22:24 <SridharG> so sc68cal, any idea to whom to send an email about this requirement?
15:24:10 <sc68cal> SridharG: sadly, no. I'm kinda spoiled by having ihrachyshka around, where we can just yell at him about rhel packages
15:24:17 <sc68cal> we need a ubuntu person we can yell at :)
15:24:29 <SridharG> sc68cal: hahaha... :-)
15:24:48 <sc68cal> SridharG: let me try and look up who the maintainer is for keepalived in ubuntu
15:24:49 <ihrachyshka> WAT
15:24:59 <ihrachyshka> I mean... what's up?
15:25:09 <zigo> I'm here.
15:25:37 <sc68cal> zigo: I thought you were debian though - I try and avoid pinging you about ubuntu so I don't look stupider than I am
15:25:37 <SridharG> hey zigo... good to see that you package keepalived for Ubuntu.
15:25:38 <HenryG> I have asked zigo to stop by. Not sure he can help with ubuntu, but he may know who to talk to.
15:26:13 <zigo> SridharG: s/ubuntu/debian/
15:26:28 <zigo> I do everything in Debian, and then Ubuntu guys just pick it up and "sync" from Debian.
15:26:41 <zigo> For Juno, I did absolutely *all* the Python module dependencies.
15:26:51 <ihrachyshka> zigo, so briefly, a version bump for keepalived is needed for ipv6 in l3_ha
15:27:08 <ihrachyshka> zigo, that sounds 'kind' of ubuntu people :|
15:27:14 <HenryG> keepalived is not python, is it?
15:27:33 * sc68cal takes note to buy zigo drinks at summit
15:27:34 <ihrachyshka> HenryG, of course not
15:27:52 <zigo> keepalived is maintained by Alexander Wirt
15:27:55 <zigo> Not by me.
15:28:22 <zigo> He's a very active DD, and also taking care of Debian backports.
15:28:29 <HenryG> A name! Thanks zigo.
15:28:35 <SridharG> ok cool. thanks zigo
15:28:52 <sc68cal> I see a LP group too - https://launchpad.net/~keepalived
15:28:59 <zigo> I'd suggest you open a bug against the keepalived package (severity: wishlist) and ask him to push a new version in Debian Experimental.
15:29:38 <zigo> Otherwise, just shoot a mail to formorer@debian.org
15:30:01 <zigo> He's also often on IRC (on OFTC, in one of the #debian-* channels, like -devel, and others).
15:30:19 <SridharG> ok zigo. Thanks for the info, very much appreciated.
15:31:02 <sc68cal> +1 thanks zigo
15:32:31 <zigo> My pleasure.
15:34:52 <HenryG> I would also like to bring up ipv6 testing and documentation
15:35:26 <sc68cal> HenryG: floor is yours :)
15:35:50 <HenryG> We'll soon have an experimental job that tests with IP_VERSION=4+6
15:35:50 <zigo> Answer from foromer on #debian-devel right now:
15:35:53 <zigo> <formorer> zigo: lets hope 1.2.16 (released today) is better than 1.2.14 and 1.2.15 :)
15:36:03 <zigo> So I guess he'll do it "soon".
15:36:37 <sc68cal> HenryG: oh? What about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160856/ ?
15:36:55 <sc68cal> russellb has been on my case that it should be the default
15:37:01 <SridharG> Wow!! thanks zigo :-)
15:37:34 <HenryG> sc68cal: I know, but how long until that gets approved?
15:37:40 <russellb> what i'd do?
15:37:59 <sc68cal> russellb: dual stack ipv6 testing - default in devstack
15:38:10 <russellb> not sure i've been on your case, but i definitely agree :)
15:38:48 <HenryG> And the folks in this meeting are the choir
15:39:00 <sc68cal> HenryG: I think it's just a case of actually fixing bugs in Neutron so that it can be merged
15:39:27 <HenryG> sc68cal: right, and that's where the experimental job can help
15:40:10 <HenryG> When dual-stack (a term which some find confusing) is the default, we won't need the experimental job any more
15:40:44 <sc68cal> HenryG: true - I just recall that I got down the rat hole of making changes to DevStack and DevStack gate due to conversations at the SLC sprint that having an experimental job was not preferred
15:41:28 <sc68cal> but feel free to propose, maybe since it's not been "easy" we have a datapoint to justify a exp. job
15:42:02 <HenryG> https://review.openstack.org/167847
15:42:27 <HenryG> I would much prefer the devstack default though
15:42:46 <HenryG> So everyone work on fixing the bugs to make it happen
15:42:55 <sc68cal> :)
15:43:32 <haleyb> HenryG: do you have a list of bugs remaining?  my latest devstack clone was pretty happy in dual-stack mode
15:43:59 <haleyb> i have some cycles to track something down
15:44:07 <HenryG> I would also like to see functional, api and scenario tests added for the new stuff if there are any gaps
15:44:10 <sc68cal> I updated the devstack default patch earlier today, but I got bit by the bug at the gate today over a horizon dep
15:44:20 <sc68cal> that had the gate all messed up
15:44:49 <HenryG> I did a recheck for ya
15:44:58 <sc68cal> lol
15:45:10 <sc68cal> we both just did :)
15:45:32 <dane_leblanc> Aren't the only remaining bugs listed in this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/168063/
15:45:56 <dane_leblanc> One of which is in the process of getting merged?
15:46:01 <HenryG> dane_leblanc: that's what I am hoping
15:46:36 <dboik> HenryG, sc68cal: so https://review.openstack.org/#/c/160856/ should also be updated with those dependencies right?
15:47:17 <HenryG> sc68cal: can you try that?
15:47:27 <sc68cal> dboik: HenryG yes that looks correct
15:47:39 <HenryG> One of the deps is a devstack change
15:47:51 <HenryG> https://review.openstack.org/161877
15:48:10 <HenryG> So sc68cal you could rebase on that
15:48:34 <HenryG> And then add the other three deps in the commit msg
15:48:48 <sc68cal> sounds good - I'll respin based on this info and add co-authors to share credit
15:49:24 <HenryG> excellent
15:49:28 <HenryG> Finally, docs
15:49:34 <sc68cal> since you guys did better than I did tracking all the pieces that it needed :)
15:50:20 <HenryG> We need to get multiple prefix and ipv6 router documented
15:50:49 <HenryG> Who has some material, and who/where do we give it to?
15:51:47 <HenryG> We can check with emagana where it should go
15:52:06 <sc68cal> It probably could land in the new networking guide
15:52:12 <sc68cal> there is going to be an ipv6 section
15:52:30 <emagana> HenryG & sc68cal: +1 on networking guide!
15:53:21 <HenryG> Some small explanations may be needed in the release notes and in the upgrade notes (if there is such a thing)
15:53:59 <HenryG> That's all from me
15:56:10 <sc68cal> HenryG: thanks :)
15:58:38 <sc68cal> OK everyone, until next week!
16:00:06 <sc68cal> #endmeeting