15:01:02 #startmeeting neutron_ipv6 15:01:03 Meeting started Tue Apr 7 15:01:02 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:06 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6' 15:01:24 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-IPv6-Subteam 15:02:44 hello everyone.. 15:03:01 hello 15:03:05 o/ 15:03:08 hi 15:03:21 hi 15:03:23 o/ 15:03:24 hi 15:04:20 Hi 15:05:09 Since we're in the RC phase, things have been pretty quiet 15:05:35 I saw dane_leblanc had a patch for fixing an issue at the gate that was v6 related 15:06:16 sc68cal: Yes, a prior v6 commit exposed some concurrency issues. 15:06:25 It's not got much to do with v6 other than some new v6 code and tests exposed latent DB issues 15:07:10 gotcha 15:08:58 Hopefully we can get some movement on the dependencies for the dual stack testing at the gate patch, I see one got merged 15:09:35 I'll probably ping some folks on the tempest and devstack side to see if we can get those merged 15:10:46 That's all I had to share, who's got things to discuss? 15:11:14 I have a wrench I could throw into the works 15:11:16 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-anderson-v6ops-siit-dc-00 15:11:28 this is a spec for siit in datacenters 15:11:38 there's a software implementation underway to do this in the kernel 15:11:54 would be interesting to have a v6-only subnet with floats implemented by siit at the hypervisor 15:12:15 sorry, that should read IPv4 floats* 15:13:06 interesting - I did have a slide in Paris about v4 at the edge of openstack, and v6 for everything internal 15:13:22 now I have more ammunition and smart people who've thought of it already :) 15:13:32 http:://jool.mx implements it in the kernel 15:13:39 http://www.litech.org/tayga/ in userspace 15:15:30 very cool - i'll have to do some reading :) 15:16:13 hmmm, NAT64 15:16:40 someone from IBM was asking about this the other day 15:17:57 this would be needed if someone deployed a v6 only network in a datacenter 15:18:17 exactly 15:20:05 I created a bp for it a while back, seems like that some work needs to be done for it: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/nat64 15:20:35 it doesn't have any meat in it yet 15:22:49 Concern I have is that Neutron seems to be trending towards smaller footprint 15:23:11 this might belong in advanced services 15:23:21 yes, that was my thinking 15:23:33 as weird as it sounds, this is something I'd define as "IPv4 as a Service" 15:24:07 interesting name 15:29:20 If nobody has an objection, let's go ahead and wrap up the meeting for this week 15:30:51 alright everyone - take care. Until next week! 15:30:53 #endmeeting