15:01:06 #startmeeting neutron_l3 15:01:06 Meeting started Thu Jun 19 15:01:06 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:10 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' 15:01:20 o/ 15:01:24 hi 15:01:32 hi - i'm standing in for carl today, so be gentle :) 15:01:41 hi 15:02:10 #topic Announcements 15:02:50 i don't have any specific announcements, i'll just re-post that the interim meeting is coming up soon if you haven't made plans yet 15:03:23 #topic Bugs 15:03:40 aloha 15:03:43 Are there any bugs anyone wants to discuss? 15:05:52 #topic l3-high-availability 15:06:53 I don't see safchain 15:06:56 i don't see sylvain here so i'll come back to it later if necessary 15:07:04 #topic neutron-ipam 15:07:16 hi, 15:07:20 hi 15:07:40 I got some comment mostly formatting errors and I am going through and fixing them. 15:08:25 We are still on track to meet Juno-2 milestone. 15:08:48 Looking for all the comments from community. 15:09:19 That's it from me. 15:09:48 ok, thanks. i did notice the gerrit link on the subteam page leads to an empty page, don't know if that can be fixed by tagging your specs review differently 15:10:38 Can you send me the link, I can followup? 15:10:44 the link to the ipam spec on the agenda page is bad 15:10:59 sure, https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-L3-Subteam 15:11:12 from L3 Meeting page? 15:11:35 seizadi: yes 15:11:44 yes, there's a Gerrit Topics link there i clicked to see your spec, but it shows nothing 15:11:44 If I can edit the wiki I will fix it. 15:12:11 if not let me or carl know 15:12:17 OK 15:12:59 i think it might just be how you tag the review, but i don't know 15:13:33 #action seizadi will get gerrit topic link on subteam page to work 15:13:43 #topic bgp-dynamic-routing 15:14:19 hi 15:14:59 the state is the same than the last week, we are waiting for Carl's review 15:15:08 hi 15:15:17 yamamoto: hi 15:15:31 ryu team is working on ipv6 peering and advertizement 15:15:51 devvesa: thanks, carl is out this week 15:16:42 haleyb: yes! I've seen the mail 15:17:05 yamamoto: thanks, is there a spec for that? didn't it on the subteam page 15:17:46 no, i’m just talking about ryu bgp implementation which might be used by the bgp-dynamic-routing bp. 15:17:57 ah, ok, thanks 15:19:12 are orange folks here? they might want to introduce their bgp speaker. 15:20:27 devvesa: what’s the status of your poc? 15:20:45 i'm going to send a mail to ryu's mailing list today with some thoughts and ideas 15:21:16 thank you very much. we loves to hear that! 15:21:23 currently I'm connecting ryu's with a quagga's bgpd daemon with your example code 15:21:35 but I haven't spend the time I would like to it 15:23:33 anything else on bgp? 15:24:01 nothing from me 15:24:11 not me neither 15:24:18 ok, thanks, i'll move to next topic 15:24:22 #topic neutron-ovs-dvr 15:24:25 thanks 15:24:50 There was no DVR meeting this week, and i believe most of the team is out 15:25:28 haleyb: yes 15:25:30 I am continuing to work on our multi-node devstack systems, but time has not cooperated as I expected 15:25:39 but there’s still some progress being made 15:26:02 as far as the patches withe the bulk of the feature 15:26:20 also, we’re preparing a recording that shows the feature in actio 15:26:20 n 15:26:29 so that people can better visualize what’s going on 15:26:36 that’s all I have 15:26:58 haleyb: I have volunteered to help with dvr testing, and have multi-node devstack working without dvr, if that might help 15:28:47 chuckC: we have the same here, and were doing a baremetal install as well. I was hoping to at least get some patches out this week just to enable it in local.conf, maybe tomorrow 15:29:29 armax: thanks, and it seems like there is still some active reviewing on the patches so that is good 15:29:34 haleyb: ok to chat outside channel? 15:29:50 sure, ping me after meeting 15:29:54 haleyb: btw I was going to collate all patches in a single branch 15:29:59 for easier consumption 15:30:15 however I am waiting for the last bits to come alone before that’s complete 15:30:41 haleyb: I think there are still a few loose ends that need to be tied 15:31:17 haleyb: up and then I’ll publish it here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/DVR/HowTo 15:31:30 armax: that would be great getting things on one branch, would make installing them into devstack easier 15:31:32 haleyb, chuckC: if you have localrc to share, gotchas etc 15:31:40 please post it to that wiki page ^ 15:32:02 i peeked some of dvr changes and got a little surprised that it was big and intrusive than i expected. 15:32:18 haleyb: yes 15:32:40 haleyb: also we need to figure if something needs to go to devstack itself 15:33:02 haleyb: especially when more automated tests are introduced 15:33:51 armax: at a minimum something like "q-dvr" to turn-on the correct flags, but it's not just one option from my reading 15:35:47 we’ll see... 15:35:56 these days everything can be controlled by a local.conf 15:36:10 so that might be a setting for a new experimental jenkins job 15:36:22 haleyb: need to cordinate with openstack-infra 15:38:10 yes, once we can get it enabled consistently we need to look at the testing side more 15:38:48 anyhoo that’s all from me 15:38:56 ok, thanks 15:39:21 #topic l3-svcs-vendor-* 15:39:50 i don't see pcm 15:40:19 did notice he did update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96946/ the other day 15:40:35 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96946/ 15:40:52 #topic Open Discussion 15:42:12 anyone have anything else they want to discuss? otherwise you can have 20 minutes back for reviews :) 15:42:41 earlier end of meeting is fine for me as it’s midnight here :) 15:42:51 nothing from me 15:43:18 ok then, thanks everyone 15:43:20 #endmeeting