15:03:14 #startmeeting neutron_l3 15:03:15 Meeting started Thu Jul 10 15:03:14 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is carl_baldwin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:03:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:03:18 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' 15:03:28 #topic Announcements 15:03:43 I’m at the Neutron mid-cycle sprint. So, this meeting should be short. 15:03:52 What agenda items do you have to discuss? 15:04:05 devvesa: yamamoto: hi 15:04:14 about BGP dynamic routing spec 15:04:47 kyle wrote a wiki page with the code reviewers assigned to each Juno-2 bp 15:05:00 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronJunoProjectPlan#Juno-2_BP_Assignments 15:05:06 i miss the BGP one 15:05:07 a short update about ryu bgp: filtering code for ipv4 is in review 15:05:37 great yamamoto 15:06:09 unfortunately, I haven't checked new ryu bgp version neither this week 15:06:59 carl_baldwin: I asked Kyle to add the BGP spec in the wiki, but he hasn't do it yet 15:07:03 np. if you have a chance to try, i recommend master rather than a release at this point 15:07:16 ok, i jot down it 15:07:50 devvesa: The list isn’t complete. It is only a very short list of the highest priority BPs. 15:08:01 Actually, it is a very small percentage of them. 15:08:09 ok... 15:08:21 i start to worry about it, because there is only a week left 15:10:21 i just wanted to insist about the review a little bit more... to me, nothing else to say 15:10:24 I will bring it up here at the mid-cycle. 15:10:32 carl_baldwin: thanks 15:12:57 devvesa: Thanks. 15:13:08 #topic Open Discussion 15:13:38 carl: have you had a chance to review the IPAM BP? 15:14:13 seizadi: Let me look to see where I am with that one. 15:18:20 hi carl 15:18:59 seizadi: I will review this evening. 15:19:02 viveknarasimhan: hi 15:19:21 could you please share any update on plans for merge of DVR in the code-a-thon 15:19:42 viveknarasimhan: hi 15:19:58 We’re working to get tempest tests running with DVR enabled in a devstack. 15:20:11 I think if we can make that work then the chances will be good. 15:20:28 ok 15:20:39 i see a squash review for DVR opened up today: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105864/ 15:20:57 That is purely for testing. It will not merge that way. 15:21:14 It was just an attempt at getting the gate to run with DVR enabled. 15:21:30 … in kind of a hackish way but it should work nonetheless. 15:21:49 We’re also working on getting a Jenkins server running to test the patches as they progress. 15:22:01 great.. 15:22:30 thanks for the progress 15:23:27 please let me know if help is required . i will try to squeeze time to assist you and armax 15:23:41 hi there 15:23:52 We’ve got a pretty decent devstack integration working now. I’ve been able to use it to create a fresh devstack with dvr enabled. 15:25:08 that is good to know. so i believe you are patching #105864 to master tip to test out DVR. 15:25:56 viveknarasimhan: Yes, that is basically it. 15:27:24 from my side 15:27:35 update is I submitted the modified blueprint as new review 15:27:53 also i am working on spec text for 2 blueprints 15:28:22 one on supporting multiple dvrs to have interfaces on same subnet 15:29:04 which is :https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-ovs-dvr-multigateway 15:29:21 and then filed one more in Horizon for enhancements for DVR 15:29:37 which is: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/enhance-horizon-for-dvr 15:36:33 viveknarasimhan: thank you for updating l2 doc btw. i haven't had a chance to look at it though. 15:36:58 no problems. you are welcome yamamoto 15:42:11 anything else to discuss? nothing from me 15:50:51 Sorry, I’m multitasking. 15:51:00 If there is nothing else, I’ll close the meeting. 15:51:41 One more update. I was able to create a new devstack this morning and run the test_network_basic_ops tempest scenario on it successfully. My confidence is growing. 15:52:19 Thanks for joining. We’ll resume regular meetings next Thursday. 15:52:24 #endmeeting