14:59:57 #startmeeting neutron_l3 14:59:58 Meeting started Thu Apr 23 14:59:57 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is carl_baldwin_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:02 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' 15:00:11 #topic Announcements 15:00:24 I think RC2 is still in the works. 15:00:33 Other than that I don’t have any. 15:01:00 Thanks to mlavalle for cleaning up https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-L3-Subteam 15:01:11 carl_baldwin_: :-) 15:01:26 mlavalle: i'll clean up further over the next few days 15:01:33 The Kilo release is planned for 1 week from now. 15:02:09 #topic Bugs 15:02:59 Bug: #1446261 15:02:59 bug 1446261 in neutron "gate-neutron-dsvm-functional race fails HA/DVR tests with network namespace not found" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1446261 - Assigned to Carl Baldwin (carl-baldwin) 15:03:36 I’m working on this one. There must be another similar one lurking in there. Still working on it. 15:04:06 Any other bugs? 15:04:46 #topic bgp-dynamic-routing 15:05:25 devvesa cannot make it today. 15:05:43 tidwellr is also interested in pitching in here and couldn’t make it today either. 15:06:01 vikram: How is your work going? 15:06:01 I have discussed about my proposal with Jaume and we have concluded that the existing proposal will be specific to BGP 15:06:32 BP review is done.. Jaume got to modify 15:06:45 I am checking the code now 15:06:50 vikram: I will have another look. Thanks for your comments there. 15:07:17 BTW, for those interested, devvesa has put together a nice document for how to set up a test environment. 15:07:32 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/DynamicRouting/TestingDynamicRouting 15:07:41 I am drafting my proposal will send to you by next week 15:07:58 vikram: where will your proposal fit with the existing proposal? 15:08:06 yes 15:08:32 not much of changes 15:09:06 i have already discussed with Jaume yesterday 15:09:17 vikram: I will watch for it. 15:09:23 Anything else BGP related? 15:09:45 #topic neutron-ipam 15:10:29 Yes.. auth part need changes... moreover we were thinking to make the design such a way so that adding policy and vpn support will be easier later 15:10:46 #undo 15:10:46 Removing item from minutes: 15:11:32 vikram: By vpn, do you mean MPLS / BGP vpn? 15:11:53 yes. MPBGP support 15:12:05 And could you clarify what you mean by policy? 15:12:25 it's required as different tenant can have same prefixes.. adv these prefixes will clash 15:12:49 by policy i meant ACL support for filtering route adv 15:13:01 if required 15:14:07 I see. I have some thoughts on the tenant prefix clashing thing. I need to finish up a BP specification and post it for that. 15:14:12 vikram: Thanks. 15:14:28 #topic neutron-ipam 15:14:44 johnbelamaric: pavel: salv-orlando: How are things going on this front? 15:15:17 pavel_bondar has most CI passing - there is still the issue around the auto address flag 15:15:22 carl_baldwin_: been busy with other things during the past week. I thing we should see soon a spec from johnbelamaric. afaict the plan is still the asame as last week 15:15:48 salv-orlando: yes, it may take another week or so for me to put something together 15:16:47 I need to take another pass over the reviews to see what discussion I’ve missed. 15:17:41 It sounds like we just keep marching in the same direction. 15:18:03 carl_baldwin_: ok. pavel_bondar keeps rebasing and working to get all the tempest tests passing. 15:18:36 carl_baldwin_: yes. there is the item you mentioned about passing subnet dict instead of just ID - according to pavel_bondar this was necessary in order to avoid fetching the subnet, which was causing open contrail to fail in a mysterious way 15:19:51 johnbelamaric: Right. We need to finished our discussion on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150485/19/neutron/ipam/drivers/neutrondb_ipam/driver.py 15:20:04 I left that hanging. I’ll get back to it today. 15:20:24 I think it was key to not having to look up the subnet. 15:20:37 carl_baldwin_: thanks 15:20:58 johnbelamaric: Thanks for the reminder. 15:21:23 Anything else on ipam? 15:21:47 carl_baldwin_: nope. other than that issue it's just the CI which pavel_bondar is targeting for completion in the coming week 15:21:59 carl_baldwin_: CI failures that is 15:21:59 johnbelamaric: Great progress. 15:23:01 carl_baldwin_: thanks - let's wrap this up :) 15:23:14 johnbelamaric: Agreed. :) 15:23:21 #topic routing-networks 15:24:29 I put up this spec. 15:24:30 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172244/ 15:25:20 carl_baldwin_: Is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88619/ related to this? 15:25:30 I think it is key to reducing some complexity in DVR and reducing extra public address consumption. 15:25:35 * carl_baldwin_ looking 15:25:51 mlavalle: Yes, it is superseded. 15:26:06 The scope of 88619 was too big and it needed some more thought. I’ve broken it up. 15:26:15 carl_baldwin_: I'll replace it in the agenda with the new one 15:26:52 Thanks. Be sure to mark it as superseded. If I recall, 172244 has a link to it in the references. 15:26:56 mlavalle: Thanks. 15:28:22 I’d like it if reviewers could review it and bring any questions to me. I’m happy to discuss it. 15:28:25 carl_baldwin_: will do 15:28:29 #topic Open Discussion 15:29:54 If there is nothing else, we’ll make it a short meeting. 15:30:33 Thanks everyone. 15:30:51 bye 15:31:22 bye 15:31:22 #endmeeting