15:01:30 <mlavalle> #startmeeting neutron_l3 15:01:32 <openstack> Meeting started Thu May 14 15:01:30 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:33 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:35 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' 15:01:41 <mlavalle> hi 15:02:09 <jschwarz> hi 15:02:13 <mlavalle> #topic Announcements 15:04:36 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: hi. 15:04:37 <carl_baldwin> I may need to run out to take care of some pre-travel stuff this morning. 15:04:38 <mlavalle> any announcements other than the obvious one, summit is next week? 15:04:38 <carl_baldwin> I guess we all know that summit is coming up in just days. 15:04:38 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I don’t have any. 15:04:38 <carl_baldwin> Oh, I guess there is one. 15:04:38 <mlavalle> any other anouncements by the team? 15:04:38 <carl_baldwin> The specs process policy change merged. 15:04:39 <carl_baldwin> specs are still in but deadlines are out and we file bugs for feature requests to be reviewed by the drivers team. 15:05:06 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: deadlines to get specs in process approved? 15:05:30 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: No hard deadlines. 15:05:53 <carl_baldwin> But, you should understand that proposals coming later will be much harder to fit in to the scope of a release. 15:06:07 <mlavalle> that's fair 15:06:34 <carl_baldwin> I will actually plan to start specs earlier since we should be able to get it open earlier. 15:06:48 <carl_baldwin> … instead of waiting for the official opening for a new release. 15:06:56 <carl_baldwin> That’s all I have for announcements. 15:07:08 <mlavalle> any other annoucements from the team? 15:07:32 <mlavalle> #opic Bugs 15:07:38 <mlavalle> #topic Bugs 15:08:43 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: any bugs we ned to discuss today 15:08:45 <mlavalle> ? 15:09:11 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: I don’t know of any new ones that need discussion. 15:09:49 <mlavalle> any body else? 15:10:09 <mlavalle> #topic Vancouver Summit planning 15:10:49 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: anything we should know about the contributos day on Friday? 15:10:59 <mlavalle> contributors^^^^ 15:12:06 <carl_baldwin> We’ve got a lot of topics: IPAM, l3vpn, dynamic routing, address scopes, which could use time 15:12:25 <mlavalle> ok, moving on 15:12:31 <johnbelamaric> carl_baldwin: unfortunately I am leaving Friday morning 15:12:32 <mlavalle> #topic IPAM 15:13:07 <carl_baldwin> tidwellr: johnbelamaric: pavel_bondar: How are we doing? 15:13:23 <pavel_bondar> carl_baldwin: good 15:13:56 <pavel_bondar> I have started to decompose my refactor to use new IPAM review into 2 separate review 15:13:57 <carl_baldwin> pavel_bondar: I think the patch is shaping up. I’m still worried it is a bit large for reviewers to easily handle. Any thoughts? 15:14:15 <carl_baldwin> Ah, you beat me! 15:14:20 <pavel_bondar> )) 15:14:45 <tidwellr> pavel_bondar: cool, it is a large review to digest 15:14:53 <pavel_bondar> The first part is uploaded already, it contains pure refactor, moving methods between classes and so on 15:15:07 <carl_baldwin> I honestly think that it will help to break it up a bit if we can find good boundaries to divide it on. 15:15:14 <pavel_bondar> It replaces current review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153236/ 15:15:23 <carl_baldwin> pavel_bondar: Thanks for the link. 15:15:38 <pavel_bondar> and the second one is comming soon where new ipam code is added 15:15:53 <pavel_bondar> I will make it to depend on this one 15:15:57 <carl_baldwin> pavel_bondar: If it is pure refactoring, the size is more manageable in my opinion. 15:15:58 <johnbelamaric> I think that was a good idea to make it more digestible 15:16:18 <carl_baldwin> +1241, -1037 isn’t terrible when most of it is moving code. 15:17:02 <carl_baldwin> pavel_bondar: Good. 15:17:20 <pavel_bondar> there are also some interface changes for some internal methods, but yeah, mostly is just moving methods around 15:18:35 <carl_baldwin> pavel_bondar: I now have some momentum on it and I will keep that going today. 15:18:52 <carl_baldwin> Hopefully other reviews will find some time to spend on it today too. 15:18:54 <pavel_bondar> carl_baldwin: nice, thanks! 15:19:05 <mlavalle> anyhing else on ipam? 15:19:37 <johnbelamaric> mlavalle: just that pavel_bondar is going on vacation for two weeks so another engineer will be picking it up while he is out 15:19:44 <pavel_bondar> carl_baldwin: fyi, I will be on vacation starting tomorrow, so hosung hwang will maintain these patches 15:19:53 <pavel_bondar> yeah 15:20:06 <mlavalle> thanks for letting us know 15:20:18 <mlavalle> moving on...... 15:20:33 <carl_baldwin> pavel_bondar: Yes, hosung has sent an email of introduction. 15:20:41 <carl_baldwin> Anything more on IPAM? 15:20:47 <pavel_bondar> that is it 15:21:01 <mlavalle> #topic l3vpn 15:21:29 <mlavalle> carl_baldwin: you are leading this, right? 15:21:55 <carl_baldwin> Is there anyone around to talk l3vpn or mpls/bgp? 15:22:21 <carl_baldwin> If not, I don’t think there is much to discuss right now except that I think “address scopes” is a step in the right direction. 15:22:31 <pc_m> carl_baldwin: There has been some discussion in the VPN IRC meetings. 15:22:52 <pc_m> carl_baldwin: on mpls/bgp vpn. 15:23:40 <carl_baldwin> pc_m: Can you link to a transcript? I did not attend. 15:23:49 <pc_m> carl_baldwin: checking... 15:24:18 <pc_m> #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/vpnaas/2015/vpnaas.2015-05-12-16.03.log.html 15:24:32 <pc_m> I think there was some discussion the week before as well. 15:25:01 <pc_m> matrohon will be creating a wiki for BPG/MPLS VPN 15:25:26 <pc_m> probably need to coordinate work between the two teams... 15:26:25 <carl_baldwin> pc_m: Thanks, we do need to coordinate. 15:26:50 <mlavalle> anything else on l3vpn? 15:27:37 <mlavalle> it doesn't seem there is anybody from the mpls/bgp team? 15:28:26 <mlavalle> do we have anything to discuss about ipv6? 15:28:55 <mlavalle> or routing-networks? 15:28:57 <carl_baldwin> sc68cal: ? ^ 15:29:05 <sc68cal> Think right now the main focus is the PD patch 15:29:06 <carl_baldwin> mlavalle: Nothing on routing networks for now. 15:29:25 <sc68cal> it's gotten a little big to review - I know for me at least 15:29:38 <carl_baldwin> sc68cal: Very timely reminder. 15:30:03 <sc68cal> so I'm hoping the author can break it into the API+DB then the implementation 15:30:09 <mlavalle> #topic ipv6 15:30:43 <mlavalle> anything else on ipv6? 15:30:54 <sc68cal> I don't see baoli 15:31:04 <sc68cal> HenryG: anything on the ipv6 side you can think of? 15:31:31 <carl_baldwin> Just a link 15:31:33 <carl_baldwin> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158697/ 15:32:09 <mlavalle> I think we can move on...... 15:32:25 <mlavalle> #topic Open Discussion 15:32:45 <mlavalle> any topics folks want to bring up? 15:32:58 <carl_baldwin> tidwellr: devvesa: Anything on dynamic routing? 15:33:27 <carl_baldwin> Vikram said that he would be travelling during this meeting. 15:33:29 <tidwellr> just waiting on devvesa to finish restoring some patches 15:33:45 <carl_baldwin> … and rebasing? 15:33:56 <tidwellr> right, restore/rebase 15:34:38 <carl_baldwin> Okay. 15:35:29 <mlavalle> any other topic? 15:36:21 <carl_baldwin> I look forward to seeing/meeting many of you at the summit. 15:36:31 <sc68cal> ++ 15:36:31 <carl_baldwin> Safe travels to all. 15:36:36 <mlavalle> In that case, will return 20 minutes to your busy agendas. Looking forward to see you all in Vancouver 15:36:53 <mlavalle> #endmeeting