15:01:33 #startmeeting neutron_l3 15:01:34 Meeting started Thu Nov 2 15:01:33 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:38 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' 15:01:52 Hi 15:01:55 hi 15:02:05 Hi 15:02:37 #topic Announcements 15:02:56 Next week is the Summit in Sydney 15:03:42 haleyb, davidsha: do you want to chair the meeting next week? or should we skip? 15:04:06 mlavalle: since you and swami can't make it why don't we skip 15:04:35 haleyb, davidsha: cool, I'll send a message to the ML 15:05:24 Next announcement is the Queens-2 milestone will take place on the week of December 4 - 8 15:05:40 Any other announcements from the team? 15:06:15 None from me 15:06:37 #topic Bugs 15:07:00 haleyb: any DVR bugs you want to discuss? 15:07:42 mlavalle: i think the tempest scenario failure is at the top of my list, let me find the number 15:09:25 i'll look later, or come back to me after other bugs 15:09:53 i usually have a bug query in front ot me 15:10:10 LOL 15:10:36 I think we discussed it during the CI meeting 15:10:55 * haleyb is in a swamp full of alligators at the moment so wasn't ready 15:11:45 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1717302 perhaps 15:11:46 Launchpad bug 1717302 in neutron "Tempest floatingip scenario tests failing on DVR Multinode setup with HA" [High,Confirmed] 15:11:55 yeah that's it 15:12:54 haleyb: I remember the comment was: "we have our best people working on it" :) 15:12:57 there might have been a new bug this week as well, haven't triaged yet 15:13:04 meaning Swami 15:13:17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728665 15:13:18 Launchpad bug 1728665 in neutron "Removing gateway ip for tenant network (DVR) causes traceback in neutron-openvswitch-agent" [Undecided,New] 15:13:21 so that brought a sigh of relief to ihrachys 15:14:03 then with swami at summit the sigh was back 15:14:05 mlavalle: and then you mentioned he was at the summit all next week ;P 15:14:15 yeah LOL 15:14:18 I spolied it 15:14:40 mlavalle: so that other one needs triage/confirmation ^^ 15:14:49 i just tagged as dvr 15:15:38 haleyb: Thanks for the update 15:15:41 that's all i had 15:16:13 We don't have any other high / critical bugs in L3 this week 15:16:45 * haleyb re-assigns his bugz 15:16:56 davidsha: do you have any bugs you want to discuss? 15:17:09 None that I'm aware of 15:17:18 cool 15:17:35 #topic Multiple port bindings 15:17:52 davidsha: do we have any updates from sean-k-mooney this week? 15:18:15 mlavalle: I haven't gotten any I'm afraid. 15:18:57 ok, on my said I cleaned up the zuul failures we had with the service plugin 15:19:46 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414251/ 15:19:50 it's green now 15:20:00 so please review if you have some time 15:20:19 axk 15:20:22 ack* 15:20:38 I am also working on the integration with ML2 15:20:46 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/512129/ 15:20:59 This is still a WIP 15:21:23 Working through the ML2 plugin to decide the best way to do it 15:22:04 I plan to work on this in the airplane back / forth from Sydney. I will have a lot of hours of uninterrupted work time 15:23:21 #topic Kick ass DVR 15:23:29 :) 15:23:41 I put up a new patch set last friday 15:24:16 It has floating IP working in it, I've just been tweaking the patch to make it pass tests 15:24:39 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472289/ 15:25:20 I'm going to start into the unit tests and then I'll remove the POC from the commit message when those are in. 15:26:58 What was causing the issue with the tests is that one of the jobs is running with linux bridge and it means the OVS-db isn't set up and it causes some issues with some small changes I have in the L3-Agent. 15:26:59 Great progress. Thanks for working so hard on this! 15:27:38 Thanks! 15:28:09 anything else on this topic? 15:28:39 Not from me, are there any questions? 15:29:27 nope 15:29:34 moving on 15:29:44 #topic Open agenda 15:30:11 haleyb: I noticed you reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/470596/ 15:30:27 port-forwarding? 15:30:35 based on what you read, do you think we can use centralized fips for this? 15:30:37 yes 15:31:22 i think so 15:31:51 so has someone involved in kuryr looked at this? they are mentioned as a consumer 15:32:06 that's a very good point 15:32:16 I'll find someone to take alook at it 15:32:35 That's all I had this week 15:32:36 i will ask our resident kuryr expert 15:32:52 haleyb: great, thanks :-) 15:33:01 any other topics? 15:33:57 ok guys, thanks for attending and the updates 15:34:03 see you in two weeks 15:34:09 #endmeeting