15:02:44 <haleyb> #startmeeting neutron_l3
15:02:45 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Nov  8 15:02:44 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is haleyb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:02:46 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:02:48 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3'
15:03:01 <njohnston> o/
15:03:04 <tidwellr> hi
15:03:09 <slaweq> hi
15:03:10 <liuyulong> hello
15:03:18 <slaweq> haleyb: LOL
15:03:47 <ralonsoh> hi
15:04:15 <haleyb> mlavalle is traveling today, think we have quorum
15:04:31 <haleyb> #topic Announcements
15:05:05 <haleyb> Summit next week for anyone going to Berlin
15:06:06 <haleyb> And we're in Stein-2
15:06:33 <haleyb> any other announcements?
15:07:13 <haleyb> #topic Bugs
15:08:07 <haleyb> i don't see Swami, let me do a query
15:08:45 <haleyb> Looks like just one new one
15:08:50 <haleyb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1802006
15:08:50 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1802006 in neutron "Floating IP attach/detach fails for non-admin user and unbound port with router in different tenant" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to Arjun Baindur (abaindur)
15:09:34 <haleyb> Swami and I confirmed this is a bug and Arjun was going to push a patch
15:10:01 <haleyb> should be a one-liner
15:10:30 <haleyb> next is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1774459
15:10:30 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1774459 in neutron "Update permanent ARP entries for allowed_address_pair IPs in DVR Routers" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan)
15:11:03 <haleyb> Swami continues to work on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/601336/
15:11:20 <haleyb> thanks for all the reviews tidwellr !
15:11:35 <tidwellr> np
15:12:01 <tidwellr> this is an interesting one
15:13:12 <haleyb> yes it is, these allowed address pairs have been 'interesting'
15:13:53 <haleyb> next is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1796824
15:13:53 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1796824 in neutron "Port in some type of device_owner should not allow update IP address" [Wishlist,Fix released] - Assigned to LIU Yulong (dragon889)
15:14:14 <haleyb> change merged, good job liuyulong  :)
15:14:52 <liuyulong> Thanks
15:15:48 <haleyb> next is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1794991
15:15:48 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1794991 in neutron "Inconsistent flows with DVR l2pop VxLAN on br-tun" [Undecided,New]
15:16:36 <haleyb> Swami was unable to reproduce, but asked for submittor to test, but no response yet, i'll add a note
15:18:28 <haleyb> next is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1787919
15:18:28 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1787919 in neutron "Upgrade router to L3 HA broke IPv6" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Brian Haley (brian-haley)
15:18:50 <haleyb> i updated the change last night, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613396/
15:19:34 <haleyb> just need some further testing in my environment to verify IPv6 forwarding gets set correctly in different situations
15:20:19 <haleyb> next is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1789434
15:20:19 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1789434 in neutron "neutron_tempest_plugin.scenario.test_migration.NetworkMigrationFromHA failing 100% times" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Manjeet Singh Bhatia (manjeet-s-bhatia)
15:21:02 <haleyb> i don't know if manjeets is here
15:21:23 <haleyb> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611461/ is the change, i know he's been busy
15:22:18 <haleyb> last one i have is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1795870
15:22:18 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1795870 in neutron "Trunk scenario test test_trunk_subport_lifecycle fails from time to time" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel)
15:23:17 <haleyb> last note from miguel was it's still failing, and he left links to good/bad logs
15:23:53 <slaweq> yes, I saw his links but I didn't have time to look at them today
15:25:25 <haleyb> slaweq: thanks, maybe we can look over next week as miguel won't have time
15:25:53 <haleyb> i had no more bugs, anyone else have one i missed?
15:26:00 <liuyulong> Give me one minute
15:26:02 <liuyulong> thanks
15:26:08 <slaweq> yes, that's my plan but now I'm backporting 2 dvr routers patch to stable branches :)
15:26:21 <liuyulong> One more thing for bug 1796824, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/608909/ this patch is neutron side fix. It's ready now. : )
15:26:21 <openstack> bug 1796824 in neutron "Port in some type of device_owner should not allow update IP address" [Wishlist,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1796824 - Assigned to LIU Yulong (dragon889)
15:26:48 <haleyb> slaweq: yes, 2 dvr routers was ++ - nice job getting that merged :)
15:27:05 <liuyulong> Two bugs need opinions
15:27:06 <liuyulong> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1799138
15:27:06 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1799138 in neutron "[l3][port_forwarding] a port can have port_forwarding and then bind floating IP again" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to LIU Yulong (dragon889)
15:27:07 <liuyulong> https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1799137
15:27:07 <liuyulong> They are all about floating IP port forwarding.
15:27:08 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1799137 in neutron "[l3][port_forwarding] should not allow creating port_forwarding to a port which already has a binding floating IP" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to LIU Yulong (dragon889)
15:27:10 <slaweq> thx, and thx for help and reviews haleyb and liuyulong :)
15:27:32 <liuyulong> And the patch are also ready there
15:27:40 <haleyb> liuyulong: sorry, forgot that one since it was marked Fixed, but it was just neutron-lib
15:28:27 <liuyulong> That's all from me. Thanks
15:28:49 <slaweq> liuyulong: for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614452/ I was reviewing today and except some small nits I think it's good
15:29:52 <liuyulong> slaweq, so, such restrictive condition is OK for you right ?
15:30:42 <slaweq> that we will not allow do port forwarding to port which already have FIP, right?
15:31:17 <liuyulong> yes
15:31:21 <slaweq> IMO that makes sense, at least for now if that not works in some scenarios (like DVR)
15:31:35 <slaweq> haleyb: what You think about it?
15:32:13 <haleyb> i think the restriction is ok in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614727
15:32:34 <liuyulong> And another is "if a port has port forwarding and is under dvr router, we will not allow binding floating IP to it." https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614727/
15:33:09 <liuyulong> OK, great, seems both are OK for you guys
15:34:12 <liuyulong> haleyb, as far as I know, port forwarding will not work for dvr in some scenarios, but not for all types of router.
15:34:45 <liuyulong> so https://review.openstack.org/#/c/614727 this patch only consider add restrition for dvr scenario.
15:35:32 <haleyb> liuyulong: ack, thanks
15:36:08 <haleyb> any other bugs ?
15:36:41 <haleyb> moving on
15:36:45 <haleyb> #topic Floating IPs and vnic_type
15:37:07 <haleyb> ralonsoh: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mos/+bug/1566951 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611059/
15:37:07 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1566951 in neutron "Duplicated traffic in SR-IOV and DVR mode" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez)
15:38:27 <haleyb> looks like we need the neutron-lib change to merge first, then consume
15:38:32 <haleyb> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/615126/
15:38:41 <haleyb> i will take a look at that today
15:38:59 <ralonsoh> thanks!
15:40:37 <haleyb> #topic On demand agenda
15:40:46 <haleyb> anything else to bring up?
15:42:41 <haleyb> crickets means 'no' i guess
15:42:53 <davidsha> I'm good :)
15:43:46 <haleyb> davidsha: oh, were there any updates on the router info patch?
15:44:18 <davidsha> We're still going through it, just some issues getting the functional tests running locally
15:44:19 <xubozhang> hi
15:44:28 <xubozhang> i am working with David
15:45:10 <haleyb> thanks, i'll keep an eye out for any updates
15:45:10 <xubozhang> yeh, i got mysql/postgres unavailble issues
15:46:01 <davidsha> There were a "few" tests failing with "bridge not found" in the CI so we're just investigating that when we get the tests running locally
15:47:09 <davidsha> Thats it from me anyways, xubozhang anything else to add?
15:47:42 <xubozhang> nope
15:48:01 <davidsha> haleyb: have you any concerns with how we refactored the agent?
15:48:53 <haleyb> davidsha: i haven't looked at it in a couple weeks, will do before next meeting
15:50:02 <davidsha> kk, thanks. I'm going to be at the Summit next week so I'll be away, but I'll keep an eye on email for any comments.
15:51:09 <haleyb> ok, thanks
15:51:46 <haleyb> We will have this meeting next week as i think we'll have quorum, anyone going to the summit enjoy Berlin!
15:51:59 <haleyb> #endmeeting