14:00:34 #startmeeting neutron_l3 14:00:35 Meeting started Wed Jun 12 14:00:34 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mlavalle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:38 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3' 14:00:44 hi 14:00:48 hi 14:00:51 hi 14:02:12 o/ 14:02:36 good morning everybody 14:02:46 goor early morning to you wwriverrat 14:02:54 good evening liuyulong 14:03:13 #topic Announcements 14:04:24 Reminding everybody that we are on our way to the Train-2 milestone the week of July 22 - 26 14:04:27 #link https://releases.openstack.org/train/schedule.html 14:06:05 Also remember that the Shanghai Call For Papers deadline is July 2nd 14:06:29 liuyulong and I are exploring partnering in a port forwarding talk 14:06:42 it's a feature we haven given enough exposure to 14:07:01 any other announcements? 14:07:54 ok 14:07:58 #topic Bugs 14:08:23 First of I have https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1824571 14:08:25 Launchpad bug 1824571 in neutron "l3agent can't create router if there are multiple external networks" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to Miguel Lavalle (minsel) 14:08:41 I thought I had fixed this one a couple of weeks ago 14:09:07 however it still, under certain conditions, throws the execption, although functionality is not affected 14:09:27 so I lowered the priority from critical and I'll fix it over the next couple of days 14:10:12 Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1831534 14:10:13 Launchpad bug 1831534 in neutron "[l3][dvr] with openflow security group east-west traffic between different vlan networks is broken" [High,In progress] - Assigned to yangjianfeng (yangjianfeng) 14:10:59 It will be basically fixed in such way. 14:11:12 we have a proposed fix here: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/663008/ 14:11:47 liuyulong: seems on the right path, right? 14:12:02 so i guess we should close https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1831706 as a duplicate of that? 14:12:03 Launchpad bug 1831706 in neutron "[DVR] Modify `in_port` field of packets which from remote qr-* port" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to yangjianfeng (yangjianfeng) 14:12:09 We need some DVR and OVS experts. 14:12:26 Yes, we can track the issue in one bug. 14:12:45 yes it seems so. in fact same person assigned to both 14:13:43 ok, will take a look at the patch soon 14:13:52 I'm testing the current code, it works. But we need more carefully about this to avoid unexcepted aggression. 14:14:31 will you leave a note in the patch once your testing is done, liuyulong? 14:14:43 The first version https://review.opendev.org/#/c/663008/4 can work with openflow security group. 14:15:04 But when the openvswith agent disable the firewall, it will not. 14:15:33 So current patch is mainly aim to this direction. 14:16:16 mlavalle, Jianfeng is my colleague. : ) 14:16:23 ah cool 14:17:23 I talked with Slawek last week 14:17:50 I wander if we can add some 'vlan' based tenant network test cases. 14:18:35 At present, it seems unlikely that it is achievable. 14:19:16 ok 14:19:22 Next one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1774459 14:19:23 Launchpad bug 1774459 in neutron "Update permanent ARP entries for allowed_address_pair IPs in DVR Routers" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Swaminathan Vasudevan (swaminathan-vasudevan) 14:19:40 We have a patch here: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/651905/ 14:20:32 this looks to be in good shape, I was going to give it another pass before giving it my +1 again 14:21:14 yeah, I'll do the same unless haleyb wants to be over it, since he already +2ed it 14:21:25 go over it ^^^^ 14:21:39 i can look again 14:21:49 cool, thanks 14:22:01 any other bugs we should disucss today? 14:23:28 I take that as a no :-) 14:23:37 #topic Routed Networks 14:24:20 This is a very popular topic from this meeting's past that is making a roaring comeback thanks to wwriverrat 14:24:38 lol... roar like a kitten 14:24:59 as you all know, we have a spec in progress: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657170 14:25:48 and a patch that mostly covers the linuxbridge implementation: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/623115/ 14:26:21 I spent time this past weekend looking at the code from the OVS perspective and it seems to me not much is needed from that perspective 14:26:41 so I am deploying it in a dev environment in my home office 14:27:00 and will make sure everything works from OVS's perspective 14:27:29 there *may* be more than the alembic migration for that. 14:27:39 I also had a chat with ralonsoh (who usually attends this meeting) and he will look at it from the sr-iov perspective 14:27:57 mlavalle, I'm still reading the spec and the SRIOV code 14:27:58 again, at first glance, not much change is needed if at all 14:28:18 ralonsoh: thanks. no rush 14:28:46 for migration, I know we have some script link attached to the bug and maybe to to the review 14:28:50 so we will have this topic in this meeting until we merge this feature 14:29:20 I started this to get some ideas out onto a sharable location: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Neutron_Mult-segment_support 14:29:39 ahhh, fantastic 14:29:49 as for dev I'm at a decision fork. would like some feedback 14:30:16 one fork may break everthing, the other will be softer but not quite right 14:30:57 Code in question: https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/cbee0f9f88ff34f70ff19590471b5405e06ff2a9/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/agent/_agent_manager_base.py#L62-L68 14:33:02 right, we are touching an RPC interface 14:33:50 I will leave a comment in the patch with my 2 cents soon 14:34:04 \and I encourage others to do the same 14:34:21 something in there definitely has to change in order to achieve the one->many (network->segments) 14:34:30 yes 14:36:25 I remind the team that we would like to merge this by Train-2 14:36:33 anything else on this topic today? 14:37:06 one loosely related item 14:38:14 I've ressurected https://review.opendev.org/#/c/486450/ which would give us the ability to do floating IP's and other potentially interesting things on routed networks 14:38:53 thanks for that 14:39:08 wwriverrat: I'd especially love your feedback on this 14:39:09 +1 14:39:11 I will take a look at the revised version this week 14:39:36 I see klindgren has already given a +1 in the past too. I'll look deeper 14:39:59 I've re-worked it, so klindgren's +1 may or may not be valid anymore :) 14:40:31 sure. I'll poke him today to have him take another gander. me2 14:41:10 tidwellr, wwriverrat: are you guys planning to go to Shanghai? we could partner on a routed networks update presentation there 14:41:48 would love to, but not holding my breath 14:42:12 not sure yet if I'm going 14:42:18 after these two changes, routed networks will be feature complete and that merits a Summit presentation 14:42:22 I'll start the sell to the travel budget folk 14:43:00 I'll put together a talk overview and send it to you for your feedback 14:43:10 awesome 14:44:00 ok, moving on 14:44:10 #topic On demand agenda 14:44:18 anything else to discuss today? 14:45:52 ok, thanks for attending 14:45:54 o/ 14:45:59 #endmeeting