13:59:32 <liuyulong> #startmeeting neutron_l3
13:59:33 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb  5 13:59:32 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is liuyulong. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:59:34 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:59:36 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_l3'
14:00:26 <liuyulong> Hi there
14:02:18 <liuyulong> #topic Announcements
14:04:08 <liuyulong> #link https://releases.openstack.org/ussuri/schedule.html
14:04:20 <liuyulong> Next week is U-2.
14:06:24 <liuyulong> OK, let's move on.
14:06:28 <liuyulong> #topic Bugs
14:06:42 <liuyulong> #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-February/012332.html
14:08:16 <liuyulong> First one:
14:08:19 <liuyulong> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1861674
14:08:19 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1861674 in neutron "Gateway which is not in subnet CIDR is unsupported in ha router" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Zhengdong Wu (zhengdong.wu)
14:08:32 <slaweq> hi, sorry for being late
14:09:55 <liuyulong> slaweq, hi
14:10:52 <liuyulong> From the response of the bug reporter, the HA router will lose one route rule in the namespace comparing to none-HA router.
14:14:07 <liuyulong> So the test could be something like this: if the external network has subnet with IP range(CIDR) which does not include the gateway IP address.
14:16:15 <liuyulong> The HA router namespace will lose the route rule to gateway IP.
14:16:45 <liuyulong> And then floating IP or SNAT traffic may not work.
14:19:08 <liuyulong> Here is my test:
14:19:09 <liuyulong> openstack network create --external public-test-1
14:19:15 <liuyulong> openstack subnet create --subnet-range --gateway --network  public-test-1  public-test-subnet-1
14:19:40 <liuyulong> According to the information of the bug
14:25:35 <liuyulong> OK, we should do some more test in detail.
14:25:48 <liuyulong> Let's move one.
14:27:19 <liuyulong> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1861032
14:27:19 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1861032 in neutron "[RFE] Add support for configuring dnsmasq with multiple IPv6 addresses in same subnet on same port" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Harald Jensås (harald-jensas)
14:27:44 <liuyulong> And its related rfe
14:27:46 <liuyulong> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1855854
14:27:47 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1855854 in neutron "[RFE] Dynamic DHCP allocation pool" [Wishlist,New]
14:27:57 * haleyb is really late
14:28:58 <liuyulong> IMO these IPv6 related requests make sense to me.
14:30:21 <haleyb> when i talked to harald yesterday, he was waiting for a response from the dnsmasq maintainer on a proposed patch to make this possible
14:30:41 <haleyb> without that it would be a large change to neutron to support multiple ipv6 addresses per port
14:31:25 <liuyulong> #link http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2020q1/013743.html
14:31:34 <liuyulong> haleyb, this patch right?
14:31:40 <slaweq> there is new rfe proposed related to that one https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1861032
14:31:40 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1861032 in neutron "[RFE] Add support for configuring dnsmasq with multiple IPv6 addresses in same subnet on same port" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Harald Jensås (harald-jensas)
14:32:46 <haleyb> liuyulong: no, there was another one, and simon responded today saying he was going to update
14:33:41 <liuyulong> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2020q1/013671.html
14:33:45 <haleyb> http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2020q1/013763.html
14:33:51 <liuyulong> [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] DHCPv6 - Multiple reservations for single host
14:34:14 <liuyulong> Yep
14:34:42 <haleyb> either way, i'd defer to harald, and he needs to wait on dnsmasq to see what work is needed in neutorn
14:36:18 <liuyulong> This is interesting now, neutron is trying to request its dependency to make something 'new'.
14:38:48 <liuyulong> OK, we can continue the discuss in the LP.
14:39:23 <liuyulong> Next one is related to OVN:
14:39:26 <liuyulong> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1861502
14:39:26 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1861502 in neutron "[OVN] Mechanism driver - failing to recreate floating IP" [High,Triaged] - Assigned to Maciej Jozefczyk (maciej.jozefczyk)
14:40:28 <liuyulong> According to the LOG trace in the description, looks like a function param missing.
14:41:42 <haleyb> maciejjozefczyk: are you working on that or need someone to take it?
14:41:42 <liuyulong> Next also related to OVN
14:42:22 <maciejjozefczyk> haleyb, I need to take PTO on next day. If someone will have a minute to take a look, I'm ok with that :)
14:43:05 <haleyb> maciejjozefczyk: thanks, i'll see if it's just a simple change
14:43:30 <maciejjozefczyk> haleyb, this is realted only to maintanance task, perhaps it needs an additional unittest
14:45:41 <haleyb> maciejjozefczyk: ack
14:46:01 <liuyulong> It could be a easy one, " )
14:46:10 <liuyulong> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1861510
14:46:10 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1861510 in neutron "[OVN] GW rescheduling mechanism is triggered on every Chassis updated unnecessarily" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Maciej Jozefczyk (maciej.jozefczyk)
14:47:08 <liuyulong> This one could be related to the gateway rescheduling performance.
14:47:33 <liuyulong> Looks like a "thundering herd".
14:47:40 <maciejjozefczyk> liuyulong, yes, Im working on it right now.
14:48:34 <liuyulong> maciejjozefczyk, cool
14:48:37 <liuyulong> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705660/
14:48:43 <liuyulong> ^ this is the patch.
14:49:10 <maciejjozefczyk> liuyulong, The fix is about: 1) filtering unrelated events that are generated by ovn sbdb
14:49:45 <maciejjozefczyk> 2) verify and pass only needed logical router ports to be rescheduled
14:49:46 <liuyulong> Maybe test cases should be added for it. : )
14:49:59 <maciejjozefczyk> liuyulong, actually I'm workign on unit/functional tests now :)
14:51:47 <liuyulong> Honestly, these OVN DB related changes are new to me, I may need sometime to learn it. : )
14:52:43 <liuyulong> I'm in the reviewer list now
14:53:18 <liuyulong> So is this worthy to do the stable branch backport?
14:53:51 <maciejjozefczyk> liuyulong, Yes, that is needed. We found that actual solution could lead to kind of 'storm' of events.
14:54:05 <liuyulong> OK
14:54:32 <liuyulong> But this could be a cross project backport now.
14:55:02 <maciejjozefczyk> liuyulong, yes, We would need to backport it to networking-ovn.
14:55:54 <liuyulong> Next one:
14:55:57 <liuyulong> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1861509
14:55:57 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1861509 in neutron "[OVN] GW rescheduling logic is broken " [High,In progress] - Assigned to Maciej Jozefczyk (maciej.jozefczyk)
14:56:20 <liuyulong> maciejjozefczyk, This is only in neutron right?
14:56:48 <liuyulong> networking-ovn does not have such issue?
14:57:12 <maciejjozefczyk> The fix that I'm proposing in previous patch also is related to the bug 1861509. Those need to be pushed together.
14:57:12 <openstack> bug 1861509 in neutron "[OVN] GW rescheduling logic is broken " [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1861509 - Assigned to Maciej Jozefczyk (maciej.jozefczyk)
14:57:23 <maciejjozefczyk> liuyulong, networking-ovn also has this issue.
14:57:40 <maciejjozefczyk> I added two closes-bug tags to
14:57:42 <maciejjozefczyk> #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705660/
14:58:00 <liuyulong> Yes, it is pointing to same fix
14:58:18 <maciejjozefczyk> Both needs to be then cherry-picked to stable branches.
14:58:54 <liuyulong> Sure
14:59:01 <liuyulong> We are out of time.
14:59:09 <liuyulong> Let's end here.
14:59:16 <liuyulong> #endmeeting