14:10:23 <ajo> #startmeeting neutron-qos 14:10:24 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jan 13 14:10:23 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ajo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:10:25 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:10:29 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_qos' 14:10:38 <ajo> #topic lonely meeting 14:11:32 <ajo> Something seems to have happened with the ics and the biweekly week for QoS meeting has shifted. So the attendance seems to be ihrachys and me so far :) 14:11:34 <ajo> anyone else? 14:12:12 <ajo> ok 14:12:26 * ajo looks for the last meeting agenda in etherpad 14:12:53 <ajo> ihrachys , could you update about the last drivers meeting comments on QoS RFEs? 14:13:00 <ajo> #topic RFEs 14:13:28 <ihrachys> ajo: do you have links? 14:13:39 <Sam-I-Am> mornings 14:13:44 <ajo> hi Sam-I-Am :) 14:14:02 <openstackgerrit> Ihar Hrachyshka proposed openstack/neutron: tests: don't assume neutronclient does not write to stderr https://review.openstack.org/266885 14:14:09 <sbelous> salv-orlando: ping 14:14:17 <ajo> hmmk bandwidth 14:14:35 <ajo> ihrachys, did you realized we started the meeting in #openstack-neutron ? 14:14:48 <ajo> I didn't know we could do that 14:14:56 <ajo> sorry guys 14:14:59 <ihrachys> ouch 14:15:08 <ajo> we -> I 14:15:09 <ihrachys> let's proceed quickly 14:15:39 <ihrachys> ok, for 802.1p https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1505631 I think the decision is we need to understand the use cases better 14:15:50 <openstack> ihrachys: Error: Could not gather data from Launchpad for bug #1505631 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/1505631). The error has been logged 14:16:32 <ihrachys> also https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1521194 was raised yesterday (aggregated bandwidth by vikram) 14:16:33 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1521194 in neutron "Qos Aggregated Bandwidth Rate Limiting" [Wishlist,Triaged] 14:17:03 <ihrachys> I think for that one the decision is we should update the docs if needed, and forget the idea unless we have clear understanding how we implement it in non-naive way 14:17:17 <ihrachys> probably that's it for RFEs? 14:17:42 <ajo> correct, on that one we need to discuss implementation, and the RFE modifies the current agreed/documented behavior, which may be it's counter intuitive and needs to be better documented. 14:17:50 <ajo> ihrachys: yes, thanks 14:17:54 <ajo> #topic status 14:17:57 <ajo> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qos-mitaka 14:18:44 <ajo> about RPC callback upgrade mechanism, I have this: https://review.openstack.org/265347 , where I need to fix some comments, and 14:18:54 <ajo> add another patch on top to complete the functionality 14:18:58 <ajo> reviews are appreciated 14:19:09 <ihrachys> yes, I owe you one 14:19:41 <ajo> np, I'm advancing on it, anytime will be good. I'm sure I'd already have reviews if it was posted earlier. 14:20:03 <openstackgerrit> garyk proposed openstack/neutron: HACKING: updtae HACKING.rst file to include latest changes https://review.openstack.org/266935 14:20:13 <ajo> njohnston, ihrachys , what's the status on the UUID api for DSCP ? 14:20:30 <ihrachys> ajo: I am working on the spec, need to respin one more time 14:20:36 <ihrachys> will upload today. 14:20:43 <openstackgerrit> Andreas Scheuring proposed openstack/neutron: lb: ml2-agt: Separate AgentLoop from LinuxBridge specific impl https://review.openstack.org/246318 14:20:43 <ajo> ihrachys , link? 14:20:57 <ihrachys> https://review.openstack.org/263819 14:21:37 <ajo> great 14:21:38 <ihrachys> also davidsha will work on the code 14:21:45 <ajo> about rbac, 14:21:47 <ihrachys> which is nice since I can review then :) 14:21:58 <ajo> Yep :) 14:22:14 <davidsha> ihrachys, ajo: I'm here, sorry just noticed! 14:22:21 <ajo> QoS/RBAC: spec with good feedback is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254224/ 14:22:37 <ajo> it needs drivers attention now 14:22:41 <ihrachys> ajo: for rbac, I would say the more interesting part is the implementation 14:22:50 <ajo> yep, code is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250081/ 14:22:59 <ihrachys> ajo: I guess armax should be reached to merge it. I don't believe there is any reason not to. 14:23:25 <ajo> spec seems good, and I already did a couple of reviews on the code, but I don't remember now, I will need to re-review 14:23:28 <ihrachys> for what I know, hdaniel is currently working on refactoring the patch, so may wait until that with reviews 14:23:34 <ajo> ack 14:23:38 <ajo> hdaniel++ 14:23:51 <ajo> njohnston, any update for DSCP markings? 14:24:07 <ajo> (sorry, this is a phantom neutron-qos meeting on the wrong channel, trying to cut it quickly ;-) ) 14:24:20 <davidsha> Nothing on dscp atm 14:24:22 <njohnston> I am working on the functional tests; Vic Howard uploaded API tests a couple of days ago, and then we tackle fullstack/tempest 14:24:27 <davidsha> Sorry! 14:24:44 <ajo> njohnston, great :) 14:25:21 <njohnston> other than that I think we're mostly waiting on the prerequisites. davidsha, have you rebased the dscp patch against the 2 prereqs? 14:25:47 <davidsha> no, not yet. 14:26:18 <njohnston> ok, whoever needs to respin next might want to do that :-) Hopefully it will be me with functional tests. 14:26:40 <ajo> awesome, thanks for the update :) 14:26:44 <ihrachys> there is no patch to rebase on my side 14:26:46 <ihrachys> :) 14:26:55 <davidsha> I'm working on that! 14:27:24 <ajo> ack 14:27:27 <ajo> about the gate, 14:27:32 <ajo> ihrachys , could you update on : https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:neutron-tempest-gate-hook,n,z ? 14:28:04 <ihrachys> yeah, gate... 14:28:15 <ihrachys> we wait on job name discussion 14:28:21 <ajo> ok, 14:28:21 <ihrachys> which is silly but yeah 14:28:28 <ajo> so we may propose names 14:28:34 <ihrachys> discussion here https://review.openstack.org/247697 14:28:38 <ajo> like allplugins 14:28:40 <ihrachys> waiting for dougwig response 14:28:42 <ajo> or something like that 14:29:10 <ihrachys> I am impressed how long it takes 14:29:27 <ihrachys> I mean not the response but the overall effort to gate on it 14:30:05 <ajo> Politics, resources, risk, and of course, names :) 14:30:37 <ajo> Thanks for working on it ihrachys 14:30:47 <ihrachys> my pleasure 14:31:20 <ajo> Ok, let's keep it short, unless somebody believes we're missing something important 14:31:49 <ajo> I'll move the conversation to the list so others can participate, and make a reminder that next week there's no planned meeting, but the one after the next. 14:32:09 <ajo> ihrachys , davidsha , njohnston , ack? :) 14:32:24 <davidsha> ack 14:32:25 <njohnston> Sounds good to me. :-) 14:32:51 <ihrachys> ack 14:33:57 <ihrachys> ajo: wanna #endmeeting? 14:34:02 <ajo> #endmeeting