15:00:34 #startmeeting neutron_qos 15:00:35 Meeting started Tue Apr 7 15:00:34 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ralonsoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:38 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_qos' 15:01:02 today the agenda is very very light 15:01:10 let's wait 30 seconds first 15:01:16 hi 15:01:19 hi! 15:01:25 I'm here but I will have to leave in few minutes 15:01:39 this meeting will take 15 mins, not more 15:01:45 #topic RFEs 15:01:52 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1858610 15:01:53 Launchpad bug 1858610 in neutron "[RFE] Qos policy not supporting sharing bandwidth between several nics of the same vm." [Undecided,New] 15:02:16 Until we don't have a PoC or a spec, I'll freeze this RFE in out meetings 15:02:30 ++ 15:02:42 and that's all in this topic 15:02:53 let's move on 15:02:54 #topic Bugs 15:03:04 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1864630 15:03:05 Launchpad bug 1864630 in neutron "Hard Reboot VM with multiple port lost QoS " [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to Nguyen Thanh Cong (congnt95) 15:03:16 both master and Train patch are merged 15:03:24 thanks to Nguyen! 15:03:30 patches* 15:03:47 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1863852 15:03:47 Launchpad bug 1863852 in neutron "[OVN]Could not support more than one qos rule in one policy" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez) 15:03:56 this one is addressed in 15:04:06 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/711317/ 15:04:22 there is also a "cherry-pick" to networking-ovn Train 15:04:36 but I'll wait until we have the neutron master patch merged 15:04:46 (reviews are welcome) 15:04:47 yes, that's good idea :) 15:05:07 there are other bugs related to QoS and OVN 15:05:16 but all of them are addressed but the mentioned patch 15:05:32 once we have this patch, I'll comment/close those ones 15:05:38 and that's all! 15:05:47 slaweq, do you have any other bug? 15:05:48 should we then reference to all of them in commit message? 15:05:57 well 15:06:14 some of them are partially related 15:06:25 and some of them are duplicated 15:06:44 the related bug in the patch is enough IMO 15:06:52 ok 15:07:00 and the other ones, with the refactor, are irrelevant now 15:07:26 and that's all in this topic for today 15:07:38 #topic Open Discussion 15:07:46 slaweq, something to add? 15:07:50 nope 15:08:06 perfect then! 15:08:17 thank you for attending, see you online! 15:08:22 o/ 15:08:26 #endmeeting