15:01:23 #startmeeting neutron_upgrades 15:01:24 Meeting started Mon Jun 5 15:01:23 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ihrachys. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:28 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_upgrades' 15:01:28 o/ everyone 15:01:49 o/ 15:02:00 o/ 15:02:27 ok seems like we don't have any specific action items from the prev meeting 15:02:38 so we can move straight into reviewing the list of OVO patches maybe 15:02:42 #topic OVO 15:02:54 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bp/adopt-oslo-versioned-objects-for-db 15:03:15 for the record, we landed router-l3-agent-binding: https://review.openstack.org/377074 15:03:22 also update_objects API: https://review.openstack.org/452266 15:03:39 (^ which I think means tunnel endpoints patch can be revived) 15:04:16 ihrachys: as you noticed gate was not so nice last week 15:04:32 we aslo have security groups OVO adoption in the gate but failing over and over because of unrelated gate issues :https://review.openstack.org/284738 15:04:41 yeah, gate is pretty bad 15:04:55 I mostly work on getting it back to normal right now 15:05:55 ok, now, starting from the top, lujinluo has two patches for router object: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466237/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/307964/ 15:06:05 I presume that those two are the only bits needed? 15:07:13 I see both having some issues passing the gate that seem legit 15:07:16 i have not checked why the eager loading patch failed yet. will check after the meeting. as for the router ovo creation patch, i have a local patch which is not finished yet 15:07:59 ok let's wait for the new version. for the relationship, functional test failure seems related, but worth a (re)check to be sure. 15:08:21 yeah 15:08:31 ok next we have network-dhcp-agent-binding: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/370452/ 15:08:36 this one has +2 from kevin, good 15:08:39 and -1 from lujinluo 15:08:58 yes, i pointed out we only need to make a slight change in test_base.py 15:09:03 -1 seems to be a small test issue, correct? 15:09:05 ihrachys: I just noticed i'll address lujinluo 's comments today 15:09:20 ihrachys, yes, very small issue 15:09:31 manjeets__, ++ I will have a look at it after the meeting to make sure we can get it in on the next PS 15:09:51 ++ 15:10:43 ok next in the list is neutron-db-manage command for data migration: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432494/ 15:11:08 I see there is some progress there, like stevedore alias added 15:11:26 manjeets__, do you know the path forward, or we need to have another look at the latest? 15:11:36 i've also added a functional test using existing framework 15:14:07 manjeets__, so do you need us to eyeball the latest? 15:14:24 sorry internet outage for a moment 15:15:08 functional test passed locally but is failing over gate, need to debug it locally again 15:15:27 manjeets___, do you need us to eyeball the latest? 15:15:38 sure that will help 15:15:51 if something is wrong with the approach i followed 15:16:41 ok next in line is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/304873/ (dvr mac address OVO) 15:16:53 it's on Tony, and I believe he is not available for the work 15:16:58 we probably need to take it over 15:17:11 thoughts? anyone heard from Tony lately? 15:17:30 no, i do not 15:18:25 ok, the patch doesn't seem huge 15:18:30 anyone want to polish it? 15:18:56 i can try, but i cannot promise i can do it this week 15:19:19 ok I will take it myself, shouldn't take a lot of time 15:19:28 ok 15:20:24 next in the list is port binding: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/407868/ 15:20:37 this one is kinda important since we have port binding changes in the pipeline 15:20:51 lujinluo, what's the status there? I see lots of red in gate. 15:21:42 yeah, somehow i have a failed UT again besides functional test failures. have not figured out why 15:22:05 i will priotirize this PS this week 15:22:09 coool 15:22:35 also, reviews would be aprreciated 15:22:47 ok let me add it to my list 15:22:56 Sorry my home network is not good today 15:23:00 it seems we have manjeetsb back now 15:23:04 Joined over phone now 15:23:49 manjeetsb, ack 15:23:57 A review on dbmanage command will help ihrachys 15:24:09 manjeetsb, + on my list now 15:24:18 Cool thanks 15:24:32 I'll checkout dvr ovo patch from Tony today 15:24:33 next in queue are two qos related objects from Rodolfo: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468406/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468837/ 15:24:50 both seem green in gate and well isolated 15:25:04 manjeetsb, I am taking it over, so no need. 15:25:12 Ok 15:25:29 for qos, I will just put it in my list but it may take a while till I get there 15:26:56 next in the list is port binding level OVO: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/382037/ 15:27:11 it was on shashank who I believe is no longer with openstack? 15:27:16 manjeetsb, you should prolly know 15:27:28 oh I see a respin on May 24 15:27:31 He switched job 15:27:52 He is no longer working on openstack now 15:28:19 ok let's check in gerrit if he is going to complete it; if no response in a week, we can take it over then 15:28:47 Sure I'll ask him he is in same building as I am in 15:29:04 cool 15:29:12 I also posted a question on his plans in gerrit 15:29:26 Ohk 15:29:36 #action manjeetsb to clarify if Shashank is going to complete port binding level OVO patch 15:30:07 next in line are ip allocation OVOs: https://review.openstack.org/396718 and https://review.openstack.org/396711 15:30:25 those were originally from Victor but I see lujinluo took over 15:30:36 I respinned these two. Please help with the reviews ;) 15:30:48 + will do, thanks for taking over 15:30:55 they seem green, good progress 15:31:34 ok next is LIKE filter support: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419152/ 15:31:36 it's on Tony 15:31:40 we should take it over 15:32:02 I believe it's mostly small things left, like a test missing and such 15:32:11 anyone willing to take it over and prepare for merge? 15:32:52 I'll review it today 15:33:13 manjeetsb, review or take over/respin? 15:33:16 And see try respining if need really small changes 15:33:25 ok, thanks 15:33:44 #action manjeetsb to have a look at LIKE support patch and respin 15:34:29 next in line is Anindita's endpoints OVO: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367810/ 15:34:37 I think this was waiting for update_objects API to merge 15:34:44 now that it's in, we should be able to revive it 15:34:56 since Anindita is no longer with us, we will need to take it over 15:35:49 I guess I can take it for respin 15:36:05 #action ihrachys to respin endpoints OVO patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367810 15:36:58 ok, most other patches are in conflicts, and I think we have a lot on our hands for the week already, so I will skip those 15:37:12 there is a small one for tests from manjeetsb : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/411981/ 15:37:43 it's nothing major, but seems like there is an issue with a test 15:37:51 manjeetsb, what's your plan for the patch? 15:38:29 I'll revisit it this week and try to address it 15:38:57 ok. no rush, it's definitely not top priority 15:39:26 Ok 15:40:11 ok let's move to the next topic 15:40:23 #topic Linuxbridge multinode grenade job 15:40:54 the job is in check queue, not voting, and failing *sometimes* depending on the cloud 15:41:03 we have this bug reported with proposed solution: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1683256 15:41:04 Launchpad bug 1683256 in neutron "linuxbridge multinode depending on multicast support of provider" [High,Confirmed] 15:41:17 I initially thought that Kevin will handle it himself, but now I am not sure 15:41:30 maybe worth checking with him if he plans the implementation 15:42:02 May be we can nudge him and ask ?? 15:42:07 sounds like a devstack-gate/project-config job 15:42:20 kevinbenton, what's your plan for https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1683256 ? 15:42:21 Launchpad bug 1683256 in neutron "linuxbridge multinode depending on multicast support of provider" [High,Confirmed] 15:42:34 do you plan to tackle it, or we should find someone to take it over? 15:43:21 it's prolly quite early for kevinbenton :) 15:43:29 ok let's figure it out off band 15:43:32 I will talk to him 15:43:44 #action ihrachys to talk to Kevin about his plans for grenade linuxbridge multinode job setup 15:44:44 #topic Open discussion 15:44:48 anyone has anything to discuss? 15:45:17 none from me 15:45:26 None from me as well 15:46:27 ok then let's wrap it up 15:46:50 overall I think we do good progress lately 15:46:59 let's complete this OVO saga this cycle ;) 15:47:03 thanks everyone 15:47:05 #endmeeting