14:00:26 #startmeeting neutron_upgrades 14:00:27 Meeting started Thu Nov 2 14:00:26 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ihrachys. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:30 o/ 14:00:31 The meeting name has been set to 'neutron_upgrades' 14:00:38 hi ihar 14:00:53 hi ihrachys 14:00:53 o/ 14:00:57 good evening folks from my good morning 14:01:09 lol 14:01:14 hi everybody 14:01:30 for the record, we discussed moving the meeting to -1h but then figured there are schedule conflicts for some of us, so we leave the slot as-is 14:01:47 thank you very much, Ihar 14:01:51 ok 14:01:57 though I believe some suggested that some other day could work 14:02:26 yes, it could be a good idea 14:02:40 do you want me to pursue that? I can check calendars if everyone is on boards and see what we can do. 14:03:19 Hmm, personally I do not think it is necessary for me to move -1h. 11PM is totally fine by me 14:03:49 I'm fine with current schedule, but maybe we could move -1h earlier for Luo 14:03:56 oh, thank you, Luo 14:04:00 it's very kind of you 14:04:03 seems like lujinluo doesn't really need it :) 14:04:07 ok we will leave as is 14:04:12 ok 14:04:13 yeah. I can deal with it 14:04:20 but feel free to raise the topic again if something changes 14:04:28 sure 14:04:33 I don't want you to suffer from late meetings more than needed 14:04:35 #topic OVO 14:04:40 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bp/adopt-oslo-versioned-objects-for-db 14:05:23 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/516961/ "Router to OVO" 14:05:31 that's some new patch 14:06:03 was it spinned off https://review.openstack.org/#/c/307964/ ? 14:06:17 Yes, I think so. 14:07:11 I see some code in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/307964/60/neutron/objects/router.py that is not present though 14:07:37 f.e. the Router object in the new patch lacks extra_attributes field 14:07:54 so it's probably a derivative but not exact copy 14:08:15 Oh, yeah. Do we have Hung here today? 14:08:20 I don't see him 14:08:43 me neither. TuanVu and annp_ can you two pass the info to him tmr? 14:08:59 sure 14:09:16 I'll inform him about this 14:09:20 I asked in gerrit what's the relation of those 2 patches 14:09:23 thanks TuanVu 14:10:03 next is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/495810/ 14:10:07 it's my pleasure :) 14:10:08 "Use Agent OVO in agents_db and test_agents_db" 14:10:22 it seems like it needs a respin for a git conflict 14:11:06 there are several small comments there but nothing huge 14:11:06 yes, I'll rebase the patch 14:11:18 and also update it as suggestion from Slawek 14:11:26 ok, and same goes for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/501925/12 "Use Agent OVO in l3_agentschedulers_db" 14:12:07 yes, regarding to that one 14:12:10 those also seem to depend on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/516511/ "Reorder checks in apply_filters in db/_model_query" 14:12:17 we're waiting for the patch from Luo to be merged 14:12:39 I am rechecking the patch now. 14:12:41 right. that patch has +W, but failed in gate 14:13:02 by the look of it, the error (u'Invalid instance image.') is not neutron specifc 14:13:12 http://logs.openstack.org/11/516511/3/gate/legacy-tempest-dsvm-neutron-linuxbridge/150563f/logs/testr_results.html.gz 14:13:15 zuul does not seem to be friendly recently 14:13:27 don't get me started lol... :) 14:13:44 lol. tons of complaints? haha 14:15:02 TuanVu, when you say we are waiting, can't we make the patches based/depend on the other patch? 14:16:07 sure 14:16:14 I'll do it 14:16:44 ok cool 14:16:50 next is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321001/ "objects: get, update and delete converted to Subnet OVO usage" 14:16:54 and I already +2d it 14:16:59 we are waiting for the second vote 14:17:12 I believe mlavalle was going to have a look in next days 14:17:46 cool 14:18:10 cool. 14:18:25 next is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396351/ "Integration of Floating IP OVO" 14:18:30 also has +2 14:18:47 there is -1 from ZhaoBo but I believe it's not valid 14:20:06 thanks for answering those 2 comments Ihar. I have not had time to check them 14:20:06 I added Miguel to reviewers there too 14:20:31 next is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/407868/ "Integration of (Distributed) Port Binding OVO" 14:21:08 so I modified my devstack env, and was able to do some debugging (though no big progresses yet 14:22:09 so you can reproduce it now? 14:22:33 yes 14:22:49 i am seeing many tempest failures now :( 14:23:22 that's good in a twisted way 14:23:30 now you can debug it 14:23:34 yeah... 14:24:54 next is https://review.openstack.org/507772 "Use Network OVO in db_base_plugin" 14:24:56 it's WIP 14:25:07 yes 14:25:22 I'm still working on it 14:25:32 I assume you will cover for Network? 14:25:38 not just for this file? 14:25:51 yes, not just for this file 14:26:10 you're correct, Ihar 14:26:55 ok, there are lots of other patches that are not in shape 14:27:05 I want to look at https://review.openstack.org/307964 "Router, RouterPort and FloatingIP to OVO" 14:27:23 I believe now that we have Router patch and FIP patch, and RouterPort already merged, we can abandon it? 14:27:39 yes! let's abandon it 14:28:02 ok done 14:28:35 Hi Ihar, for patchset https://review.openstack.org/#/c/516961/ for router ovo, pleas e help me for review 14:28:54 hungpv, hey! yeah I will 14:29:16 hungpv, we were wondering, what's the relation of this patch to the other patch we had: https://review.openstack.org/307964 14:31:46 hungpv, ? 14:31:52 Hi, my patch is a break-down patch for Router OVO only. We have looked it for some reference 14:32:12 oh ok, so it's not exact copy then 14:32:23 I mean, for Router pieces of course 14:32:25 But built new patch from our own knowledge 14:32:33 Yes, 14:32:58 makes sense. I will have a look. 14:33:18 Thank you very much 14:33:25 the list of objects being worked seems to have shrinked lately 14:33:38 I will do a revision of objects still needed till next meeting 14:33:48 #action ihrachys to review objects still missing from the radar 14:34:15 cool. thanks! 14:34:17 #topic Open discussion 14:34:31 more topics? 14:34:57 ihrachys: are you traveling to Sydney? 14:35:10 no I don't. too much of a hassle for me. 14:35:15 do you? 14:35:27 i do.. 14:35:35 seems you are only off for PTG now? 14:36:04 well, it's not strict. it's just that going to Australia would trigger lots of bureaucracy for me both for US and AUS visa 14:36:23 though I tend to skip summits since they split 14:36:42 yeah, i recalled that you did not go to Boston either 14:36:43 afaik we will have like 2-3 people from our redhat networking team there 14:36:52 which is an all time low I believe 14:37:11 the location and 4 events per year are tough asks 14:37:34 yeah, I did not see many names in the etherpad that Miguel put either 14:37:46 seems we won't have a lot of people this time 14:38:17 have fun there. maybe take a safari or smth, they have weird animals there. :) 14:38:45 well, anyway, I was hoping we can meet in person this time. hopefully some time in the near future then 14:39:00 yeah. that's unfortunate we won't. 14:39:49 I guess we can call it a day. we will still have a quick meeting next week to check status of patches and any questions. 14:40:17 unless everyone feels like skipping 14:40:21 tell me if you do 14:40:24 #endmeeting