16:02:24 #startmeeting nfv 16:02:24 Meeting started Thu Oct 2 16:02:24 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:26 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:02:29 The meeting name has been set to 'nfv' 16:02:30 #chair imendel 16:02:31 Current chairs: bauzas imendel 16:02:33 i think i did.. 16:02:36 tnx 16:02:43 nope, the "#" was missing :) 16:02:49 I leave you drive the meeting 16:02:52 ..:) 16:03:15 who is here for nfv? 16:03:19 so \o 16:03:20 colintd from Metaswitch, standing in for cloudon1 who can't make the meeting 16:03:50 #info agenda for today https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nfv-meeting-agenda 16:03:59 let's start? 16:04:24 first topic in the agenda is action items 16:04:53 colindt, can you update on the vlan trunking? 16:05:11 cloudon1 has an ai on it 16:05:11 Calum sent a note to the list yesterday detailing the usage case 16:05:44 Essentially vlan trunking provides a clean means of getting customer traffic into an NFV app with separation 16:06:52 I guess we shall review and discuss. Anyone has a comment or want to discuss it today? 16:06:52 Customer traffic comes into the service provider network over a range of access means, and the SP then dumps each customer's traffic into its own VLAN 16:07:38 this is for public networks or tenants ones? 16:08:41 It will depend on the application, but typically each VLAN will connect to a customer net 16:09:18 So the trunk allows all the customer nets to be presented to a VNF over a single interface, with no reconfig required as nets added and removed 16:10:36 ok, so this would be the main use case for it i guess. 16:11:18 Yes, a very typical use. Similar uses exist between SPs carrying end-to-end customer traffic. 16:12:12 ok, tnx. I suggest we read the use case send and discuss further if needed in the ml 16:12:33 makes sense 16:12:49 next topic in the agenda is review the design summit plans 16:12:52 • #topic ALL please review relevant project design summit plans (Nova, Neutron, Heat, Glance, etc.) 16:12:59 #topic ALL please review relevant project design summit plans (Nova, Neutron, Heat, Glance, etc.) 16:13:14 #undo 16:13:15 Removing item from minutes: 16:13:37 tnx bauzas... still learning :) 16:13:41 imendel: sorry this is part of the topic action items yet :) 16:13:47 imendel: no worries 16:14:25 anyone review the plans for the summit? 16:14:34 so, I guess it's hard to see a commitment on that action :) 16:14:45 yep... 16:14:56 we cn move to the next so 16:15:03 sure 16:15:10 keshava here? 16:16:12 imendel: I don't think so 16:16:25 i guess no. so will follow up next week on service insertion 16:16:29 let's put him again an action item 16:16:38 I leave you doing that ... :) 16:17:02 # action owner to do sth 16:17:07 #action for keshava to follow up on last week action (service insertion and chaining use case) 16:17:30 I guess we can move to next topic... 16:17:33 sure 16:17:40 #topic Juno status 16:18:00 imendel: tbp, this is #action someone to do sth 16:18:10 but that works too 16:18:24 so, Nova RC1 is landed 16:18:54 haven't seen any communaction from ttx about Neutron RC1 16:19:37 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-October/047539.html 16:19:44 bauzas: open-kulo change still gating 16:20:01 #info Nova RC1 is tarballed 16:20:11 #info no status about Neutron RC1 16:20:28 ttx: you mean about Neutron ? 16:20:47 #undo 16:20:48 Removing item from minutes: 16:21:41 #info Neutron Kilo trunk not yet open (on gate atm) 16:22:19 other updates on Juno? 16:22:32 imendel: I haven't followed that much, but it seems all necessary patches landed for RC1 16:22:59 I was seeing some ndipanov's bugfixes, dunno the exact status about it 16:23:03 ndipanov: ^? 16:23:18 talking about NUMA blueprints 16:23:32 bauzas, what? it works like a charm 16:23:38 ndipanov: oh cool 16:23:41 12 embarrassing bugs later 16:23:43 :) 16:23:53 nice so RC1 is NUMA happy 16:24:02 it should be yeah 16:24:07 cool 16:24:24 imendel: that's it for me then 16:24:33 ok, I guess it's the current status. Do we want to follow up next week too? 16:25:00 imendel: don't think so, RC2 is on its way but not including patches from our side 16:25:09 ok 16:25:24 btw sriov is also happy in RC1? 16:25:48 baoli: you there ? 16:26:06 bauzas: Hi 16:26:28 baoli: hi, imendel was querying about SRIOV status for RC1 16:26:42 baoli: do you have anything missing from RC1 ? 16:27:48 #info potential Nova RC status is here https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=juno-rc-potential 16:28:15 bauzas, I think that we are in good shape in RC1. 16:28:24 cool 16:28:27 baoli: cool 16:28:35 bauzas, there is bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370348, which I'm thinking to make it RC2 if possible 16:28:36 Launchpad bug 1370348 in nova "Using macvtap vnic_type is not working with vif_type=hw_veb" [Undecided,Confirmed] 16:29:03 bauzas, what's the deadline for RC2? 16:29:14 baoli: good question 16:29:21 baoli: I don't know yet 16:29:38 that's the rolling ballet for releases candidates 16:30:10 i guess we can move to next topic? 16:30:27 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Cycle#Pre-release_.28Release_Candidates_dance.29 16:31:21 #topic Kilo planning 16:31:43 baoli: if you want to ship the bugfix into RC2, I would suggest you to discuss that with johnthetubaguy and mikal 16:32:02 baoli: it depends if it's a really regression bug 16:32:13 baoli: makre sure it gets the tag anyways 16:32:15 baoli: or it will be shipped into the Kilo trunk 16:32:52 imendel: now, dates have been confirmed for Kilo 16:33:00 bauzas, it's not a regression. 16:33:01 imendel: let me find the email 16:33:18 tnx 16:33:31 johnthetubaguy: what tag should it get? 16:34:08 baoli: juno-rc-potential 16:34:36 meanwhile see link to the active bp list 16:34:38 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Teams/NFV#Active_Blueprints 16:34:50 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/047128.html 16:35:03 #undo 16:35:03 Removing item from minutes: 16:35:09 johnthetubaguy: thanks. 16:35:16 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/047128.html Kilo release schedule 16:36:26 imendel: now, we need to figure out which bps are good candidates for Kilo 16:36:38 any inputs on bp for Kilo... 16:38:10 We discuss in the past the scheduling bps. any insights from the team? 16:38:13 imendel: well, at least some specs have already been approved 16:38:31 imendel: those are good candidates for being worked on first 16:38:53 imendel: what do you mean by "scheduling bps" ? 16:38:58 bauzas: we have them listed? 16:39:42 bauzas: all the related to scheduling decisions. like NIC state aware scheduling 16:40:39 imendel: well, if the spec has been rejected, it will take more time than other efforts 16:40:51 imendel: because it needs to be approved first 16:41:13 imendel: unless it's something quite handy to work on, like a new filter 16:41:50 right. it was just an example. we have also Solver Scheduler - complex constraints scheduler with NFV use cases 16:41:56 anyway, some triaging/prioritization has to be done for NFV, I leave sgordon and others identify the main efforts 16:42:20 imendel: both the examples you mention are not having a good consensus yet 16:43:05 right. I was asking as I thought we discuss in the past it's an interesting idea. but if status is that still no consensus we can drop 16:43:09 for now 16:43:13 anyway, I think that's it we can do for today re: priorities 16:43:32 ok 16:44:16 we want to discuss cross-projects session proposal 16:44:42 right 16:46:07 any specific suggestions? I think ahoban had one last meeting 16:46:48 but I don't see him around today 16:47:21 bauzas: you recall? 16:47:35 not that much 16:47:42 ok...:) 16:47:57 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-summit-topics 16:48:39 let's discuss that maybe next week 16:49:29 seems so... yes 16:49:55 so last one for today is the ETSI gap analysis publication 16:50:23 #topic: ETSI gap analysis publication 16:50:32 #undo 16:50:33 Removing item from minutes: 16:50:37 redo it 16:50:53 #topic ETSI gap analysis publication 16:51:05 is this something public ? 16:51:28 Does anyone has an update on it? 16:51:45 I can try and check for next week if no one here has 16:52:05 sure, I leave you take an action then 16:52:14 I'm interested in the analysis :) 16:52:32 #action imendel to check on ETSI gap analysis publication 16:52:40 sure..:) 16:53:00 any other items for discussion ? 16:53:14 #topic other discussion 16:53:24 nice timing, 5 mins for opens 16:53:34 ...:) 16:54:52 hearing crickets... 16:54:56 I guess no other items... 16:55:07 so bauzas, tnx for your help today, i needed it :) 16:55:19 no worries, you're in a good shape :) 16:55:25 tnx everyone 16:55:31 thanks 16:55:41 #endmeeting