02:00:40 <zhenguo> #startmeeting nimble
02:00:41 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jan  5 02:00:40 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is zhenguo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
02:00:42 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
02:00:44 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nimble'
02:00:59 <zhenguo> o/
02:01:48 <zhenguo> liusheng, shaohe_feng, wanghao_, yuntongjin, little, zhangjl, zly: are you around?
02:01:55 <liusheng> o/
02:01:57 <wanghao_> yes
02:02:00 <zhangjl> zhenguo:yes
02:02:03 <zly> zhenguo, yes
02:02:14 <liusheng> I am in a internal meeting
02:02:23 <zhenguo> ok, as always , the agenda:
02:02:33 <little> yes
02:02:35 <zhenguo> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Mogan#Agenda_for_next_meeting
02:02:45 <zhenguo> let's jump in
02:02:53 <zhenguo> #topic announcements and reminders
02:03:08 <zhenguo> do you think we should start meeting with mogan now?
02:03:18 <wanghao_> yeah
02:03:18 <zhenguo> for the meeting logs
02:03:34 <zhangjl> yep
02:03:37 <wanghao_> since we have changed name in lanuchpad and wiki.
02:03:54 <zhenguo> hah, ok, next meeting I will change to log to mogan instead of nimble
02:04:13 <zhenguo> as you may be awared, the gerrit bot has been moved to #openstack-mogan
02:04:29 <zhenguo> need to wait for other bots moving, then we will change to use the new irc channel
02:04:52 <zhenguo> you can join to openstack-mogan now, as all notifications fro gerrti are present there nwo
02:04:56 <zhenguo> s/nwo/now
02:05:17 <wanghao_> ok
02:05:49 <zhenguo> ok, we can discuss the renming work in the next topic
02:06:01 <zhenguo> not much of announcement, anyone else have thing here?
02:06:44 <zhenguo> oh, seems I forget to paste the contribution report, sorry
02:06:58 <zhenguo> #link http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/nimble/90
02:07:09 <zhenguo> #link http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/python-nimbleclient/90
02:08:01 <zhenguo> oh, anyting else?
02:08:36 <zhenguo> ok, let's move on
02:08:45 <zhenguo> #topic nimble renaming
02:08:58 <zhenguo> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nimble-renaming
02:09:21 <zhenguo> seems we have done most renaming work
02:09:46 <zhenguo> I pinged some infra guys to help merge the patch which blocks us yesterday
02:11:28 <zhenguo> today I will finish the other renaming for nimble, then all things will change to mogan instead of the repo name
02:12:30 <zhenguo> hi guys, are you still around?
02:12:54 <zhangjl> zhenguo:yes
02:12:59 <zly> zhenguo, yes
02:13:19 <zhenguo> ok,
02:13:21 <liusheng> zhenguo: so we only need to wait your infra part2 patch merged ? :)
02:13:30 <zhenguo> liusheng: yes
02:13:50 <zhenguo> liusheng: and need to wait for nimble renaming 5 to be merged
02:13:58 <liusheng> zhenguo: ok
02:14:16 <yuntongjin> yes
02:14:25 <zhenguo> ok, anyone else have a thing here?
02:14:47 <zhenguo> liusheng, yuntongjin: you patches are all conflicts as the renaming, sorry
02:15:00 <yuntongjin> do we have host aggregate support now?
02:15:12 <liusheng> zhenguo: I will rebase other patches, no problem
02:15:19 <zhenguo> yuntongjin: no, as we don't has a concept of host, hah
02:15:25 <zly> zhenguo, so if I rebuild my env by devsatck,it will not succeed now?
02:15:30 <zhenguo> liusheng: thanks
02:15:45 <yuntongjin> yeah, i 'm thinking implement a node aggregate
02:15:46 <zhenguo> zly: no, you need to clean it fist
02:15:52 <shaohe_feng> hi all
02:15:54 <zhenguo> yuntongjin: hah
02:15:58 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: o/
02:16:21 <zhenguo> zly: as our gate will install the new devstack and test instance type API now, so it can work
02:16:22 <yuntongjin> will file a BP to discuss further
02:16:29 <zly> zhenguo, ok,thanks
02:16:36 <zhenguo> yuntongjin: we can discuss this in the next topic
02:16:38 <zhenguo> zly: np
02:16:55 <yuntongjin> zhenguo: great
02:16:59 <zhenguo> ok, if there's no things related to renaming, let's move on to next topic
02:17:20 <zhenguo> #topic task tracking
02:17:41 <zhenguo> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nimble-task
02:18:19 <zhenguo> let's talk about the task priorities
02:18:32 <shaohe_feng> OK
02:19:02 <zhenguo> in fact, I find many things to do now
02:19:20 <zhenguo> and Ocata is our first release, which will be important to us
02:19:22 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: you can add them in the task link
02:19:39 <wanghao_> zhenguo:  I'd like to try quota feature, anyone else with me?
02:19:43 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: sure
02:19:58 <zhenguo> wanghao_: big thanks
02:20:08 <shaohe_feng> wanghao_: good. It's a big task.
02:20:22 <zhenguo> wanghao_: liusheng mentioned he is interested in that, but I think he focues on notification now
02:20:37 <zhenguo> you know he is a celometer guy, lol
02:20:44 <wanghao_> zhenguo: shaohe_feng: yeah,  I think so too,  so welcome anyone to join us.
02:20:48 <wanghao_> zhenguo: haha
02:21:16 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: : you can refer the neutron quota framework. It's improvment, better than nova and cinder.
02:21:34 <wanghao_> zhenguo: Do we need some specs for those features?
02:21:41 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: hah, ok, but wanghao_ will work on that
02:22:03 <zhenguo> wanghao_: not now, I would like to wait for the nimble-specs renaming finished
02:22:06 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: sorry, I  wants to ping wanghao_
02:22:11 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: hah
02:22:15 <wanghao_> zhenguo: ok
02:22:36 <wanghao_> shaohe_feng: thanks, I'll see neutron code
02:22:41 <zhenguo> wanghao_: but you can use a google doc to share us, if needed
02:23:08 <wanghao_> zhenguo: sure.
02:23:09 <shaohe_feng> wanghao_: zhenguo: every task should has a owner. and other's interest in it, can work together.
02:23:49 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: yes, but seems we don't have that many volunteers
02:24:34 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: yes. this is a big problem
02:24:45 <zhenguo> and I would like to talk about the priorites here
02:24:58 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: we need jf and yongle's help for more resource. hah
02:25:06 <zhenguo> hi everyone, you can list the features that must be done before O
02:25:26 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: hah
02:26:13 <zhenguo> Is there someone interested to multi instance creating
02:26:23 <little> me
02:26:33 <zhenguo> little: oh, thanks very much
02:26:39 <shaohe_feng> good.
02:27:26 <zhenguo> and another thing we need to finshed before O is the config drive thing, do you need help shaohe_feng?
02:27:33 <zhenguo> or maybe zly can work with you
02:28:13 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: yes. she can
02:28:24 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: nice
02:28:51 <zhenguo> but I remember zly is working on instance_fault info, right?
02:28:56 <zly> zhenguo, yes,and I am thingking about add info feedback to user when create isntance failed
02:28:56 <little> shaohe_feng: maybe a lot of testing work for config drive
02:29:17 <shaohe_feng> little: yes, need many test.
02:29:19 <zhenguo> zly: ok, how's everything going?
02:29:53 <zly> zhenguo, I test the nova,and find the info code is in python lib
02:30:36 <zly> zhenguo, And somthing wrong occured on my env,It is broken
02:30:43 <zhenguo> zly: seems we can only add falt string to instance if there's something bad happened
02:31:03 <zhenguo> zly: yes, as the reanming work, maybe env will broken,
02:31:04 <zly> zhenguo, add a field?
02:31:05 <little> it will set ERROR state in db for booting instance failed in nova
02:31:18 <zhenguo> zly: yes, a field to instance like nova
02:31:30 <zly> zhenguo, Ok
02:31:34 <little> instance_faults
02:31:40 <zhenguo> little: yes
02:32:04 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: falt string  in DB?
02:32:16 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: yes, a field in instance
02:32:46 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: a tenant can see this field?
02:33:01 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: seems yes,
02:33:10 <shaohe_feng> OK
02:33:23 <shaohe_feng> seem's nova do it in this way
02:33:31 <zhenguo> yes,
02:34:06 <zhenguo> and another task is partition, seems we don't support it
02:34:28 <zhenguo> nova will pass root/ephermeral/swap partitions to ironic
02:34:40 <little> is the priority high?
02:34:54 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: any one wants to take it?
02:34:55 <zhenguo> little: yes,
02:35:06 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: I can
02:35:17 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: this need be finished in O release?
02:35:24 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: good.
02:35:48 <wanghao_> zhenguo: it's a basic feature in mogan, right?
02:35:57 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: yes
02:36:09 <wanghao_> zhenguo: if it's, that we should support it in O.
02:36:17 <zhenguo> wanghao_: yes, otherwise the baremetal serve can only have one partition
02:36:22 <zhenguo> that's terrible
02:36:29 <wanghao_> zhenguo: I see.
02:36:33 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: yes. a basic feature.
02:36:33 <little> we will use  micro version like ironic?
02:36:44 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: we must support it.
02:36:49 <wanghao_> little: not now I think.
02:36:58 <wanghao_> little: that we can support it later.
02:37:06 <little> OK
02:37:34 <zhenguo> yes, now we don't need
02:37:54 <wanghao_> a lot of work here if we want to catch Nova and other projects :)
02:38:17 <zhenguo> wanghao_: yes, and O is a very important release
02:38:36 <wanghao_> zhenguo: yes
02:38:37 <little> so we should ensure a available version
02:39:16 <zhenguo> yes, and make it usable
02:39:31 <shaohe_feng> agree.
02:39:39 <shaohe_feng> let do it.
02:39:44 <shaohe_feng> let's
02:39:56 <little> come on
02:40:06 <zhenguo> hah
02:40:55 <zhenguo> ok, we can continue to discuss in next topic, anyone else have a thing about task tracking?
02:41:27 <zhenguo> ok
02:41:30 <zhangjl> zhenguo:let me try the api docs
02:41:44 <zhenguo> zhangjl: ok thanks :P
02:42:02 <shaohe_feng> good.
02:42:37 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: I find a problem.
02:42:45 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: what?
02:42:59 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: $ git grep _destroy_networks
02:43:30 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: I find we have define 2 times this function
02:43:37 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: seems they are same code.
02:43:46 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: oh, yes, it's my fault
02:44:02 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: maybe zhangjl can help to clean it?
02:44:18 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: hah, yes
02:44:40 <shaohe_feng> OK.
02:44:50 <zhangjl> shaohe_feng,zhenguo:ok
02:44:59 <zhenguo> zhangjl: thanks
02:45:20 <zhenguo> ok, let's move on
02:45:25 <zhenguo> #topic open discussion
02:45:51 <zhenguo> oh, seems all china mobile guys disappeared...
02:47:17 <zhenguo> maybe they are still on vacation, state's company
02:48:15 <little> cool
02:48:23 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo:  china mobile is  big welfare
02:48:37 <zhenguo> hah
02:48:44 <wanghao_> zhenguo: vacation ! oh...
02:49:03 <zhenguo> not sure, hah
02:49:26 <zhenguo> I have a question
02:49:33 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: you are less vacation, but more ￥
02:49:41 <zhenguo> ....
02:50:09 <zhenguo> shaohe_feng: you have more vacation and more money :P
02:50:34 <shaohe_feng> just more vacation
02:50:56 <shaohe_feng> but I like ￥
02:51:07 <zhenguo> lol
02:51:08 <little> so do i
02:51:30 <zhenguo> maybe so do anyone
02:51:39 <wanghao_> haha
02:51:52 <zly> ￥.￥
02:53:05 <shaohe_feng> ￥.￥ looks good.
02:53:16 <zhenguo> zly: you are not graduated yes, hah
02:53:24 <zhenguo> s/yes/yet
02:54:07 <little> haha, do you develop by devstack
02:54:19 <zly> zhenguo, yes ,￥.￥
02:54:24 <zhenguo> lol
02:54:38 <zhenguo> little: sure
02:55:11 <zhenguo> only a few time left, do you want to talk about the big tent?
02:55:15 <little> zhenguo: ok
02:56:25 <little> zhenguo: you can introduce it
02:56:50 <zhenguo> how long will it take for a project to be an offical project, and when should we apply for that?
02:57:44 <zhenguo> little: I'm a bit curious about do you really care about whether it's a openstack offical project when using a project?
02:59:42 <shaohe_feng> IHMO, user should like a product of real worth.
02:59:55 <zhenguo> seems yes
02:59:57 <little> not care in using it , but maybe it get a status to become a offical project
03:00:29 <zhenguo> ok
03:00:29 <little> and others will use it and contribute it
03:00:42 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: you know usually the best product is not the Open Source.
03:00:50 <shaohe_feng> zhenguo: such as vmware.
03:01:10 <zhenguo> yes, but we are not like that, we are open source, lol
03:01:16 <zhenguo> it's almost time
03:01:39 <zhenguo> we can continue discuss in this channel, thanks y'all for joinint the meeting!
03:01:50 <zhenguo> #endmeeting