21:03:21 <russellb> #startmeeting nova
21:03:22 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb 21 21:03:21 2013 UTC.  The chair is russellb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:03:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:03:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
21:03:26 <russellb> #chair vishy
21:03:27 <openstack> Current chairs: russellb vishy
21:03:33 <russellb> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova
21:03:36 <dansmith> is this where we pat ourselves on the back?
21:03:38 <dansmith> or is that next week?
21:03:51 <russellb> Our agenda is "..." or whatever vishy says :)
21:04:00 <sdague> heh
21:04:21 <russellb> I don't think closing out g-3 went that bad personally
21:04:27 <russellb> definitely busy
21:04:48 <dansmith> agree
21:04:58 <vishy> lets do bugs
21:05:05 <russellb> k
21:05:15 <vishy> and see if anyone has anything to prop for feature freeze
21:05:47 <russellb> on the bug front ... lots to triage: http://webnumbr.com/untouched-nova-bugs
21:05:54 <russellb> and we'll need to triage python-novaclient here soon too
21:06:53 <russellb> any last minute grizzly-3 blockers?
21:06:58 <vishy> so triaging and fixing
21:07:13 <vishy> i've seen a few nasty ones but nothing that need to block
21:07:17 <russellb> trying to get https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1125378 in for grizzly-3
21:07:18 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1125378 in nova "VNC proxy can be made to connect to wrong VM" [High,In progress]
21:07:36 <dansmith> yeah, I'm working on one that will be good for rc1 but critical for g3
21:07:49 <russellb> not critical?
21:07:58 <dansmith> not critical, yes, thank you :)
21:09:15 <russellb> launchpad says 200 bugs fixed in grizzly-3
21:09:27 <russellb> not counting things we fixed without bothering to file a bug, heh
21:09:41 <Vek> I'm sure there's lots of those :)
21:09:47 <russellb> so if we focus on bugs for rc, we should be able to break 200 right?
21:10:02 <vishy> right!
21:10:09 <russellb> yay
21:10:34 <russellb> vishy: have you received any FFE requests?
21:10:38 <vishy> russellb: are you going to backport that to milestone-proposed
21:10:42 <russellb> i feel like last time around we had a bunch to consider
21:10:42 <vishy> russellb: not yet no
21:11:05 <russellb> vishy: i can backport it once it merges, sure
21:11:17 <russellb> vishy: still TBD on who will do the backports, we may need a volunteer
21:11:17 <vishy> maybe we should have volunteers due the backport of the sec bug
21:11:25 <vishy> jinx
21:11:49 <russellb> i emailed John (original author)  but it sounds like he may not have time to get it done as quickly as we'd like since it's a vuln
21:12:21 <vishy> russellb: so folsom might be extra tricky because we can't bump the rpcapi
21:12:23 <vishy> in compute
21:12:40 <russellb> argh
21:12:40 <vishy> russellb: thoughts?
21:12:47 <russellb> well ...
21:13:02 <russellb> hm.
21:13:30 <vishy> we could skip the validate part of it i suppose
21:13:48 <russellb> that's pretty  nice though
21:13:51 <vishy> i don't know if consolerpc was versioned back then
21:13:59 <russellb> it was in folsom
21:14:06 <russellb> not essex though
21:14:26 <russellb> it bumped compute too though, that's the trick
21:14:30 <vishy> russellb: might take a core to tackle that one
21:14:34 <russellb> could maybe just do it as adding a new method instead of changing one
21:14:37 <vishy> just due to rpc concerns
21:14:40 <russellb> yeah ...
21:15:15 <russellb> ok so any volunteers want to tackle a tricky security backport?  :)
21:15:38 <russellb> i can't tonight, but i can hit it tomorrow if nobody else wants it
21:16:53 <russellb> k, just emailed John and told him I'd get the backport to save him some pain
21:17:19 <russellb> Remember kids, report security issues as private bugs and patches, kthx ^_^
21:18:11 <russellb> soooooo ... what else is up
21:18:15 <sdague> are we going to get private gerrit on next cycle?
21:18:20 <sdague> I know that was talked about at one point
21:18:50 <russellb> ttx has been talking to -infra about that a lot.  I'm not sure the current status.
21:19:03 <clarkb> sdague: I think jeblair and ttx have been talking about it. I haven't been clued into what the current state of those talks is
21:21:26 <russellb> so ... any other bugs?  FFE discussion?  RC concerns?
21:22:07 <sdague> honestly, I think we merged so much code during the run up that people aren't asking for FFE
21:22:27 <vishy> i think we did pretty well this time
21:22:30 <russellb> fun times.
21:22:31 <vishy> :)
21:22:35 <russellb> vishy: same here
21:22:43 <sdague> yeh, I need a nap though :)
21:22:47 <russellb> so, design summit proposals are open ... summit.openstack.org
21:22:52 <russellb> 11 for Nova so far
21:23:09 <vishy> i started making a list of important nova features that missed
21:23:20 <ttx> sdague: probably not
21:25:19 <russellb> well congrats on a quiet meeting right after the feature freeze, shall we close and take a nap?
21:25:24 <vishy> fine by me
21:25:29 <Vek> Zzzzz
21:25:51 <russellb> bye!
21:25:54 <russellb> #endmeeting