21:01:58 #startmeeting nova 21:01:59 Meeting started Thu Sep 26 21:01:58 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is russellb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:02:00 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:02:01 hello, everyone! 21:02:03 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 21:02:07 o/ 21:02:09 hi 21:02:09 Hi! 21:02:12 hi 21:02:13 \o 21:02:14 heya 21:02:16 hi 21:02:21 hi 21:02:35 hi 21:02:37 #topic havana-rc1 21:02:48 #link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/havana-rc1 21:03:02 we'd like to release RC1 for nova early next week 21:03:09 we need to have the bug list clear before we can do tht 21:03:16 we've made great progress this week though 21:03:26 both by merging fixes, and marking things as not actually release blockers 21:03:30 #link http://old-wiki.openstack.org/rc/ 21:03:42 that graph shows progress toward RC over time for all projects 21:04:22 any particular bugs anyone wants to chat about? 21:04:39 Can I add a bug to the RC1 list? 21:04:43 Or will you punch me? 21:04:46 mikal: it will cost you 21:04:48 yes and yes 21:05:01 mikal: if you think it's a release blocker, sure. 21:05:19 Hmmm, not sure if its a blocker. Do we care about windows instances not working in libvirt that much? 21:05:23 an alternative is to tag something as 'havana-rc-potential' 21:05:26 Its sure annoying for windows people 21:05:28 which means, we'd like this in, but at the end of the day, won't block for it 21:05:45 mikal: looks like something that isn't a regression or anything right? 21:05:55 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1218391 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1226337 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1230407 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1223161 21:05:57 Launchpad bug 1218391 in tempest "tempest.api.compute.images.test_images_oneserver.ImagesOneServerTestXML.test_delete_image_that_is_not_yet_active spurious failure" [Critical,In progress] 21:06:01 Ok, I've tagged it rc-potential. Its nota regression, we've always sucked here. 21:06:06 those ar the top recehck bugs 21:06:11 k sounds good 21:06:13 mikal: i bet it'll make it anyway 21:06:19 jog0: yeah i wanted to bring up rechecks ... 21:06:28 so some stats went to the -dev list and nova looks really bad 21:06:35 we 'recheck no bug' 75% of the time 21:06:41 :( 21:06:53 who's we? not me :) 21:06:58 we as a project 21:07:04 I'll be honest. Its me. 21:07:07 lol. 21:07:12 Its often very hard to find a matching bug. 21:07:23 I should probably be filing more bugs though... 21:07:23 mikal: jog0 is working on making that much easier! 21:07:27 I know 21:07:34 I have already agreed with stick figure man on email 21:07:42 so we are working on that, should be ready soon right now sdague is workong in gettinglogstash to be faster 21:08:00 until then feel free to harass me for help 21:08:30 russellb: for all those bugs not sure what the causes or where they belong but we should at least be tracking them closely 21:08:42 jog0: *nods*, tag them all with rc-potential at least 21:08:56 #help we could use more eyes on the top recheck bugs! 21:09:18 amen! 21:09:24 :) 21:09:36 so, the other havana release item is our release notes 21:09:52 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReleaseNotes/Havana#OpenStack_Compute_.28Nova.29 21:10:26 In particular, if anyone has anything we should be documenting in "Upgrade Notes" we need to put it in there 21:10:31 we've also got a list of reviews that were saved off, but don't have text to explain the upgrade impact yet 21:10:37 so any help on this page is definitely welcome 21:10:46 we'll also need to come up with a nice feature list 21:11:00 you can take a look at the grizzly page for an example 21:11:22 it's fun to go back through what we've accomplished 21:11:58 but anyway, be thinking of anything that we really need to call out for people 21:12:05 and ping me if you want to help 21:12:30 anything else on the havana release? 21:12:34 "Objects: The biggest chunk of code you'll never notice" 21:12:37 should I add that? 21:12:47 (kidding) 21:12:50 we need to document https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46336/ 21:12:53 dansmith: i was going to write something about significant continued progress toward supporting rolling upgrades or something 21:12:53 or someone does 21:13:06 jog0: at least leave a review link in the list for now 21:13:13 russellb: done 21:13:16 perfect 21:13:44 * comstud whoops 21:14:18 alrighty, that's all i really wanted to hit today, pushing toward the release 21:14:22 in the final stretch! 21:14:25 #topic open discussion 21:14:36 #link http://summit.openstack.org/ 21:14:36 i joined just in time 21:14:45 comstud: slacker 21:14:51 i can't tell time 21:14:53 summit site is open, get your sessions in soon :) 21:16:19 any other random topics? 21:16:23 russellb: The volume encryption feature has an imposed patch in Cinder, and we need to have some review on this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46091/ 21:16:24 or non-random ones? 21:16:35 Well, I heard a rumor that our CI team will start pushing logs publicly in the next couple of weeks. 21:16:43 So that's a good thing. 21:16:47 hartsocks: nice! 21:16:52 that's great news 21:17:12 Expect some random +1's from it to start popping up here and there as they test it. 21:17:18 bpb: hm, you'll have to talk to the cinder folks about it 21:17:28 bpb: but feel free to pull me in too 21:17:41 bpb: you can find those devs in #openstack-cinder 21:17:52 russellb: I've been, and it will probably be taken care of. Just wanted to let you know 21:18:08 ok cool thanks! 21:18:22 russellb: thanks 21:18:58 alright, well enjoy the short meetings while they last 21:19:05 icehouse planning will kick up pretty soon :) 21:19:09 thanks everyone! 21:19:12 #endmeeting