21:01:35 <russellb> #startmeeting nova
21:01:36 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jan  2 21:01:35 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is russellb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:01:37 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:01:39 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
21:01:41 <russellb> hello, everyone!
21:01:43 <mriedem> hi
21:01:44 <comstud> o/
21:01:50 <russellb> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova
21:01:51 <dansmith> -o
21:01:52 <johnthetubaguy> hi
21:01:53 <beagles> hi
21:02:08 <russellb> #topic general
21:02:17 <n0ano> o/
21:02:18 <russellb> meeting time now alternates each week
21:02:28 <russellb> 2100 UTC and 1400 UTC
21:02:38 <russellb> we'll see how that goes for a while
21:02:58 <russellb> other general thing ... icehouse-2 is sneaking up on us
21:03:00 <comstud> mm, 6am
21:03:11 <russellb> comstud: i expect a different crowd at each one
21:03:15 <comstud> yeah
21:03:23 <comstud> it's cool and fair
21:03:38 <russellb> but would love to have you at 6am if you want to get up :)
21:03:46 <russellb> so, icehouse-2 release is 3 weeks from today
21:03:57 <russellb> meaning all code must be merged a couple days before that
21:04:04 <russellb> so keep that in mind
21:04:27 <russellb> #topic sub-teams
21:04:32 <russellb> anyone have updates?
21:04:46 <johnthetubaguy> nothing from xenapi really
21:04:50 * n0ano scheduler
21:04:52 <russellb> i know a lot of people have been out (including me)
21:04:56 <russellb> n0ano: go ahead
21:05:24 <n0ano> Basically, the new tree is up, I'm waiting on reviews to get the intial changes in so that it can pass Jenkens and we can open it up to everyone
21:05:42 <russellb> you have changes to make it pass now?
21:06:13 <n0ano> we cheated, made Jenkens non-voting, first order of business is to get that to work
21:06:22 <russellb> ok gotcha
21:06:26 <russellb> looks like one change already merged
21:06:28 <n0ano> we had to do other changes to get the doc & pep8 stuff to pass
21:06:54 <n0ano> a review of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62692/ would be greatly appreciated
21:06:55 <russellb> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/gantt,n,z
21:07:01 <russellb> note to everyone doing nova reviews ... please include that repo in your review queue
21:07:39 <russellb> what is that change this depends on?
21:07:50 <russellb> looks messed up
21:07:55 <russellb> has a ton of change ids in it
21:08:10 <n0ano> Just a big patch to move missing files over from the nova tree, those files are direct copies (with change history)
21:08:46 <mriedem> like an oslo sync, but not
21:09:46 <russellb> ok
21:09:55 <russellb> well i'll take a look
21:09:56 <n0ano> hopefully we this gets all the files and we won't have to move many more
21:10:00 <russellb> just getting back into some reviews today
21:10:35 <russellb> if you want to include the nova commits you're pulling in ... maybe shortlog format would be better
21:11:19 <n0ano> Not familar with shortlog, I wanted to make two change so the direcly copied files wouldn't pollute the actual changes needed for the new gantt tree
21:12:01 <russellb> just talking about the commit message contents
21:12:17 <russellb> you've got a long list of full commit messages in there
21:12:22 <comstud> yeah, that's kind of extreme
21:12:23 <russellb> kind of confusing
21:12:26 <comstud> and that
21:12:55 <russellb> i'll comment on the review
21:13:00 <russellb> anything else on scheduler bits?
21:13:18 <n0ano> My concern was to keep history and the squash wound up with that commit message, I guess I can edit the commit to remove all of the details and just specify that it's a direct copy of files
21:13:46 <n0ano> Nothing new today, I expect to get more info on things like the no-db work after the scheduler meeting next week.
21:13:48 <russellb> oh you squashed a bunch
21:13:54 <russellb> maybe just ... not squash?
21:14:01 <russellb> it also is set that vishy wrote all of it
21:14:21 <n0ano> then you get a million individual changes that need to each be reviewed
21:14:55 <russellb> yeah, i guess so ... so you could regen the repo
21:15:06 <russellb> or just have a commit that says "copied this list of files from nova"
21:15:12 <dansmith> is there any reason not to just provide a git hash and a single commit?
21:15:13 <russellb> ideally we keep the history of everything we're copying over
21:15:22 <russellb> but at some point we need to stop regenerating the repo
21:15:28 <n0ano> russellb, keeping history was my goal
21:15:43 <comstud> i would just: git commit --amend --reset-author
21:15:45 <russellb> to keep the history, you either have to not squash or regen the repo
21:15:45 <comstud> and fix the message
21:15:49 <comstud> but whatever
21:15:51 <russellb> comstud: yeah i agree
21:16:01 <russellb> these files aren't as critical to keep history on
21:16:04 <johnthetubaguy> a long commit message seems like worse of both options though
21:16:50 <n0ano> I can excise the commit message and just indicate these files are copied and to refer to the nova tree for history details if needed, does that work.
21:17:00 <russellb> yeah
21:17:06 <russellb> thanks!
21:17:18 <russellb> #topic bugs
21:17:39 <russellb> 185 New bugs
21:17:53 <russellb> so let's all try to triage a couple :)
21:18:05 <russellb> any bugs anyone wants to bring up?
21:18:46 <russellb> we can come back to bugs in open discussion if needed
21:18:49 <russellb> #topic blueprints
21:19:19 <russellb> 141 icehouse blueprints so far
21:19:33 <russellb> a lot are still pending approval, mostly waiting on updates for the submitter
21:19:50 <russellb> so if you have a blueprint not approved and you're waiting for feedback, make sure you put it back in "Pending Approval"
21:19:55 <russellb> otherwise i won't be looking at it
21:20:05 <russellb> (or anyone else presumably)
21:20:41 <russellb> the nova-core sponsor thing still hasn't really taken off
21:21:15 <russellb> so we have a lot of Low, heh
21:21:35 <russellb> but here's what we have for icehouse-2 (release in 3 weeks)
21:21:37 <russellb> #link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/icehouse-2
21:21:58 <russellb> anyone have blueprints they would like to discuss?
21:22:33 <russellb> #topic open discussion
21:22:39 <russellb> i expected today to be a slow one :)
21:22:41 <sc68cal> Ah I missed it
21:22:44 <sc68cal> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-hairpin-vif-attribute
21:22:53 <russellb> sc68cal: no problem, open discussion time is for anything
21:23:13 <russellb> sc68cal: what about it?
21:23:24 <sc68cal> So basically we have an issue with VIFs that Nova plugs into Neutron, where IPv6 packets hairpin back in and kill SLAAC config
21:23:47 <sc68cal> We're hashing out a way to have Neutron pass in an attribute to turn hairpinning on or off
21:24:37 <sc68cal> Any thoughts - feedback, etc..
21:24:59 <russellb> seemed reasonable to me (i approved the blueprint)
21:25:08 <sc68cal> thx :)
21:25:10 <russellb> np
21:25:23 <mriedem> the related patch is abandoned, is that going to be restored?
21:25:36 <russellb> the blueprint is for a re-work of that basically
21:25:41 <sc68cal> Yeah - I plan to put the VIF attribute patch on top if it
21:26:14 <sc68cal> or perhaps squash - depends on how the code ends up looking
21:26:48 <russellb> sure, similar thing, just controlled via input from neutron
21:28:02 <russellb> any other topics for today?
21:28:33 <mriedem> crickets
21:28:46 <russellb> well, welcome back from the holidays everyone :-)
21:28:50 <russellb> it's 2014, let's do this thing!
21:29:00 <russellb> catch you all later
21:29:02 <russellb> #endmeeting