14:00:52 #startmeeting nova 14:00:53 Meeting started Thu Jul 24 14:00:52 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is johnthetubaguy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:56 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 14:01:04 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting 14:01:07 welcome all 14:01:11 who is around this week then? 14:01:13 hi 14:01:17 o/ 14:01:19 o/ 14:01:33 #topic Juno Status 14:01:34 \o 14:01:43 o/ 14:01:47 so Juno-2 has been tagged, and lined up for release 14:01:52 o/ 14:02:00 its totally broken ironic and baremetal, but lets get to that later 14:02:07 :) 14:02:07 so spec exceptions 14:02:30 mikal has emailed out about those, and I am working through bringing those reviews back, and removing −2s etc 14:02:53 they all have one week, from when mikal approved them on the ML to merge, so this time next week ish 14:03:04 anyways, read the ML for more details at this point 14:03:14 just let them know when the deadline is :-) 14:03:23 #info Feature Proposal Freeze August 21st, September 4th Juno-3, FF and SF 14:03:49 bauzas: yeah, mikal is owning this process, but the idea is ASAP 14:03:56 what about specs that have only one core sponsor? 14:04:00 johnthetubaguy: sure, no worries :-) 14:04:06 anyways, any more questions on that kind of thing? 14:04:27 please all review the exceptions, they are getting updated in here: 14:04:32 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-juno-spec-priorities 14:04:34 and 14:04:35 mirrorbox, my understanding is 1 core sponsor == no exception 14:04:42 :( 14:04:42 https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting 14:04:56 yes, two cores for an exception 14:05:08 we should probably not have any more exceptions at this point 14:05:20 the process is designed to make it difficult to get an exception 14:05:23 but thats a soft line, we are still learning with the whole specs thing 14:05:47 n0ano: well, its designed to make sure things with exceptions are very likely to get into Juno, since its now so late 14:05:59 as a general heads up 14:06:04 johnthetubaguy, exactly 14:06:07 juno-2 had a tiny number of blueprints merge 14:06:16 juno-3 is looking *very* full 14:06:23 which is sort of normal... 14:06:43 but its going to be tight, so code up ASAP for a hope of getting your feature into Juno 14:07:00 and mark the blueprint as NeedsCodeReview once all the code is up and ready for review please 14:07:04 OK, lets move on 14:07:20 #topic Mid Cycle Meetup 14:07:27 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting 14:08:02 please add things if you want to talk about them 14:08:09 see you there next week if you can make it 14:08:10 awesome 14:08:28 * johnthetubaguy imagines he made whooping noises 14:08:34 #topic Bugs 14:08:40 right so we have a little one here 14:08:49 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1347795 14:08:50 Launchpad bug 1347795 in nova "All baremetal instance going to ERROR state" [Critical,In progress] 14:09:06 we (by which I mean mostly I) busted ironic 14:09:30 did the revert land? 14:09:38 nope 14:09:43 why for? 14:09:46 also, PaulMurray dug into it more 14:09:53 dansmith: failed grenade in the gate 14:10:05 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109033 14:10:11 devananda: okay, and are we holding on trying to get that going again because paul is looking? 14:10:13 there are some more comments on the bug in the last few hours, and a little chat in -nova a few minutes ago 14:10:31 seems like it got reverified 14:10:43 okay, just wanted to know what the intent was 14:10:52 yea, derekh triggered the reverify before we realized Paul was working on a fix 14:10:55 so, blah 14:10:56 PaulMurray: whats the news on this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109301/ 14:10:57 * PaulMurray hi - I'm here 14:11:18 johnthetubaguy, I just pushed a patch 14:11:24 I vote we see who wins at this point, we need ironic unblock asap I feel 14:11:35 johnthetubaguy: yeah, I'm cool with that 14:11:37 johnthetubaguy, devananda says it will test their CI as part of our jenkins 14:12:00 PaulMurray: +1 ironic should vote on it, hopefully before the revert merges! 14:12:07 the tempest-dsvm-virtual-ironic-nv job will check if that works 14:12:11 anyways sounds like things are progressing there 14:12:19 so in follow up 14:12:21 johnthetubaguy, dansmith will the baremetal test in jenkins too? 14:12:27 i'll stay on top of it for the next few hours, but then i'm on a plane for ~10hrs this afternoon 14:12:29 how to we make the ironic testing more visible asap? 14:12:44 s/to/do/ 14:12:45 re: baremetal driver, we can run a "check experimental" on any nova change to trigger tripleo 14:12:57 johnthetubaguy: IMHO, making it report as third party is about as good as we can do right now 14:13:02 johnthetubaguy: there is a patch to -infra which should help, i think ... lemme find the link 14:13:39 dansmith: seems like a good approach, but yeah waiting on ironic 14:13:42 #link https://review.openstack.org/97411 14:13:53 dansmith: devananda: can anyone remember why its not gating? 14:14:00 because its in incubation? 14:14:04 johnthetubaguy: exactly 14:14:14 right 14:14:15 johnthetubaguy: non-integrated projects aren't allowed to *vote* on integrated ones 14:14:19 in their gate 14:14:29 so that patch ^ to infra should creaet a new check-non-binding pipeline 14:14:33 hmm, right, so third party it is, after infra make that possible 14:14:35 and allow our jobs to vote in a non-binding way 14:14:40 yea 14:15:02 cools, sorry about all that, I know now what that job down the bottom I was ignoring does 14:15:12 OK… any more bugs people want to shout about? 14:15:37 while on CI 14:15:40 minesweeper status? 14:15:49 vmware people around? 14:16:06 hmm, I don't see them in the list 14:16:07 crickets 14:16:09 nope 14:16:11 move on i guess 14:16:20 I hurd they had some infrasturcture issues, but yeah, lets move on 14:16:25 I think they were working on fixing it 14:16:29 #topic Gate status 14:16:34 I'm -2ing patches until it shows backup 14:16:47 thought about WIP them... 14:17:00 dansmith: well I am certainly not approving any driver changes till I see a +1 for their CI 14:17:08 well one i'm watching has a +2 14:17:14 i don't want to see it merged w/o minesweeper at this point 14:17:17 so maybe -2 is fair 14:17:26 dansmith: −2 feels a bit harsh, but I get your point, "you don't want it to merge" and thats what −2 says 14:17:44 yep 14:17:51 I would -2 something without unit tests, 14:17:59 maybe we need −3 "hell no" 14:18:05 and without minesweeper, we have little testing, so I'm -2 on it until I see a run :) 14:18:16 right 14:18:21 actually as of ~5pm yesterday i saw it report success on this one 14:18:26 so maybe it's back and the wiki is out of date 14:18:29 move on... 14:18:35 yes 14:18:42 anything on the gate? 14:18:50 http://jogo.github.io/gate/ 14:18:57 http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/gate.html 14:19:11 looks like grenade and infra issues mostly 14:19:28 yeah, not awesome, but not broken, is that fair? 14:19:38 yeah 14:19:45 looks like we have some uncategorized nova unit test bugs in the gate http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/uncategorized.html 14:19:50 if someone wants to write e-r queries 14:20:17 OK, any more for any more on the gate? generally needs a little more attention that its getting right now 14:20:36 move on 14:20:43 #topic Review Status 14:20:56 well review those specs, I will remove −2 on the ones we need to look at ASAP 14:21:08 and freeze is soon 14:21:16 nothing major to report here 14:21:25 #topic Sub Team Reports 14:21:37 \o for XenAPI 14:21:41 please raise your hands 14:21:48 * n0ano gantt 14:22:18 short XenAPI update: CI has lots more testing running, its hurting the error rate BobBall is digging into that, and trying to bring back some stability 14:22:30 n0ano: fire away 14:22:54 2 major BPs we're pushing, client lib & DB isolation... 14:23:10 client lib is looking good, just rebasing, should go in soon.... 14:23:13 so DB isolation needs spec review, client needs code review 14:23:36 we got an exception on DB isolation, bauzas uploaded a new version of the BP, we need reviews on it 14:23:43 do we think DB isolation code will be ready before the freeze? 14:24:07 any more subteam updates? 14:24:10 johnthetubaguy, we have multiple people anxious to work on the code, once the BP is approved it should go fast 14:24:18 n0ano: cool 14:24:20 appreciate if cores can spend some time on sr-iov review: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/pci-passthrough-sriov. 14:24:26 devananda: how is the ironic merge going? 14:24:39 that's it in a nutshell 14:25:03 baoli: I see its all up for review now, which is cool, just needs eyes, awesome stuff 14:25:52 johnthetubaguy: Paul's fix doesn't quite work yet. Let's let the revert to keep going 14:25:53 OK, tumble weed 14:26:05 johnthetubaguy: oh - you mean the ironic driver? 14:26:09 * devananda switches context 14:26:09 devananda: cool, sounds OK 14:26:19 devananda: yeah, sorry, just thinking more generally 14:26:39 johnthetubaguy: we've incorporated feedback from the reviews we've gotten on the driver code 14:26:58 and are waiting on our gate re-opening so we can merge those changes into our tree and re-propose them to Nova 14:27:19 I haven't had time to dig into grenade / javelin / $something 14:27:28 so we don't yet have testing of the proposed upgrade utilities 14:27:34 but I'd love to get some reviews on those 14:27:36 OK, and some stuff to discuss at the mid-cycle 14:27:52 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101920/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102563/ 14:27:57 cool, so moving forward, which is good, but looking tight 14:28:06 OK... 14:28:07 yep 14:28:14 #topic Open Discussion 14:28:28 so, next weeks meeting, shall we cancel it? 14:28:39 johnthetubaguy, +1 14:28:45 many will of us are at traveling post midcycle I assume? 14:28:50 +1 14:29:09 OK, so I added that to the wiki already, so lets go with that 14:29:23 any more for any more? or are we done in record time? 14:29:58 there are a list of hot juno topics on the agenda, if people have any updates on those 14:30:25 OK... 14:30:35 well thanks for attending all 14:30:51 #endmeeting