21:00:46 <mikal> #startmeeting nova
21:00:48 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Nov 20 21:00:46 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mikal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:00:49 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:00:51 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
21:00:53 <dansmith> o/
21:01:11 <mikal> #topic Kilo specs
21:01:11 <alaski> o/
21:01:18 <mikal> So, perhaps this isn't the best title ever
21:01:26 <mikal> But I wanted to highlight the priority tracking etherpad
21:01:34 <mikal> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking
21:01:44 <mikal> Seems most people have found it now, its got a fair bit to review on it
21:01:48 <dansmith> FWIW,
21:01:53 <mikal> So... cores please take a look and review some of those things
21:02:06 <mikal> Any other comments on priority tracking?
21:02:07 <dansmith> I've already hit several of the reviews listed and really like having the list
21:02:14 <mikal> Good
21:02:20 <mikal> I think we should cross those off as they merge
21:02:21 <jogo> having the list is nice
21:02:26 <mikal> And then do a weekly cleanp
21:02:29 <mikal> cleanup even
21:02:38 <jogo> at the bottom I included my patch to add the priorities to nova-specs
21:02:49 <mikal> Yep, I saw that. I think that's a fair thing to do.
21:03:13 <mikal> Anything else on that?
21:03:30 <mikal> Oh, I did that backwards
21:03:32 <jogo> spot checking, I saw a few -2s on there
21:03:41 <mikal> I was meant to be talking about spec approvals first
21:03:42 <dansmith> jogo: where?
21:03:47 <jogo> such as https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102545/
21:04:12 <dansmith> that was procedural, but yeah
21:04:25 <mikal> Ahhh, we should ping John about that one
21:04:32 <mikal> So...
21:04:37 <dansmith> I think it's most helpful if the things on that list are added by the priority owner as "ready to review" and "important to review next"
21:04:37 <mikal> What I was meant to talk about in this topic
21:04:46 <mikal> Does anyone have any spec fast track requests?
21:05:25 <mikal> dansmith: yeah, I'd like the list to be short... If its 100's of patches it wont help.
21:05:40 <mikal> So... no fast track requests this week?
21:05:55 <mikal> Moving on in 3...
21:05:56 <jogo> nova-specs can use some review love though
21:05:56 <dansmith> yeah, I can just see this being a place where people put their reviews they want looked at, given that it's just an etherpad
21:06:14 <mikal> dansmith: we shall prune with vigour
21:06:29 <mikal> jogo: yeah, I've been on vacation this week. I promise to take a look next week.
21:06:34 <mikal> Let's move on
21:06:41 <mikal> #topic Gate status
21:06:46 <mikal> So, I've been on vacation...
21:06:50 <mikal> How broken is everything?
21:07:01 <jogo> mikal: not very
21:07:06 <mikal> Yay!
21:07:12 <dansmith> earlier in the week things seemed unhappy
21:07:17 <mikal> There are no critical gate bugs at the moment?
21:07:20 <dansmith> but in the last 24 hours things seem better
21:07:34 <jogo> there have been some dependency issues
21:07:39 <jogo> but not nova related
21:07:45 <jogo> things like http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394408
21:07:47 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1394408 in oslo.vmware "suds-jurko' is not a global requirement " [Undecided,Fix committed]
21:08:09 <jogo> nova wise things are pretty calm
21:08:22 <jogo> top nova bug http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1370496 that we are tracking
21:09:19 <mikal> Oh, that ssh timeout is still a thing?
21:09:28 <mikal> Wow, thats one long lived bug
21:09:40 <jogo> yeah its a catch all bug
21:09:56 <dansmith> we've fixed several real things, and I imagine there are several still remaining
21:10:03 <dansmith> but it's a wall that is hard to see past
21:10:10 <mriedem> trying to get classification rates up now
21:10:25 <mriedem> but so far nothing new and surprising for nova in the gate
21:10:30 <mikal> Ok
21:10:36 <mikal> Should we move on from this topic then?
21:10:42 <mikal> Sounds like its not too terrible this week
21:11:14 <jogo> mikal: things go well when your away, coincidence?
21:11:28 <mikal> I am happy to go on permanent vacation if you think its called for...
21:11:32 <mikal> #topic Open Discussion
21:11:45 <mikal> So... This could be a record short nova meeting if we play our cards right...
21:11:52 <mikal> Anything else we need to discuss?
21:12:00 <jogo> mikal: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1345460
21:12:03 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1345460 in nova "VMware: resize fails when there is more than one compute node" [High,In progress]
21:12:13 <jogo> mikal: someone seems to keep tagging that as critical
21:12:16 <jogo> which is very anoying
21:12:47 <dansmith> +1
21:12:50 <mikal> Sigh
21:13:39 <mikal> So, sounds like something we should ask John to discuss in the next EU meeting when more of the vmware people are around
21:13:44 <mikal> I've seen this on a few bugs
21:13:46 <jogo> mikal: ++
21:13:59 <mikal> Tracy fixes it, but other people aren't listening
21:14:31 <mikal> So, no meeting next week I assume
21:14:41 <mikal> But I'll add it to the agenda after this so we don't forget to cover it
21:14:45 <mikal> Anything else?
21:15:10 <mikal> Or I could send an openstack-dev email I suppose
21:15:17 <jogo> I think I can find something else
21:15:22 * jogo digs through specs
21:15:26 <mikal> Heh
21:15:33 <jogo> there is a push to get more PXE boot support
21:15:47 <mikal> Which hypervisor?
21:15:48 <mikal> libvirt?
21:15:48 <jogo> and the question of should we block docker if it doesn't have volume support
21:15:51 <jogo> libvirt
21:15:54 * jogo finds the spec
21:15:57 <jogo> s
21:16:08 <mikal> Ahhh, so I promised to do a thing with the hypervisor support matrix and haven't yet
21:16:13 <mikal> I need to get onto that next week
21:16:22 <mikal> I feel like the volume question should be driven by that conversation
21:16:23 <jogo> https://review.openstack.org/133254
21:16:31 <mikal> i.e. set a standard, then hold everyone to it
21:16:43 <jogo> docker: https://review.openstack.org/128753
21:18:17 <mikal> jogo: do you disagree with the hypervisor support matrix plan?
21:18:42 <jogo> mikal: sounds reasonable to me
21:18:47 <mikal> Cool
21:18:52 <dansmith> (me too)
21:18:54 <mikal> So, we'll do that then
21:18:54 <jogo> mikal: as long as volume support is required  that is
21:18:57 <jogo> but yeah sounds good
21:19:02 <mikal> Heh, well...
21:19:03 <dansmith> heh
21:19:11 <mikal> Specifics of what is required is part of that conversation
21:19:16 <mikal> So let's defer that for now
21:19:24 <mikal> So... can I end this meeting?
21:19:26 <mikal> Pretty please?
21:19:38 <mikal> Then y'all could go nap for 40 minutes
21:19:40 <jogo> early mark!
21:19:44 <mikal> LOL
21:19:59 <mikal> Here endeth the meeting
21:20:06 <mikal> #endmeeting