21:00:08 <mriedem> #startmeeting nova 21:00:09 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Aug 4 21:00:08 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mriedem. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 21:00:10 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 21:00:13 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 21:00:24 * Vek waves 21:00:26 <takashin> o/ 21:00:31 <melwitt> o/ 21:00:39 <alaski> o/ 21:00:48 <auggy> o/ 21:01:00 <jroll> hai 21:01:15 <mriedem> waiting a minute 21:01:19 <scottda> hi 21:02:06 <mriedem> alright let's get started 21:02:13 <mriedem> #link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting 21:02:18 <mriedem> #topic release news 21:02:21 <dansmith> o/ 21:02:25 <mriedem> #link Newton release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Newton_Release_Schedule 21:02:31 <mriedem> #info Today is the priority spec approval freeze. Anything still in nova-specs for review under specs/newton needs to be moved to specs/ocata else I'm going to abandon. 21:02:46 <mriedem> i've already started abandoning some non-priority specs that were rotting 21:02:58 <mriedem> there are some priority ones still up for resource providers 21:03:11 <mriedem> i don't know how many though.... 21:03:28 <mriedem> #info Aug 22-26: final non-client library release (oslo) - so if you need things released from dependent libraries get them done soon (oslo.policy?) 21:03:57 <mriedem> alaski: ^ aren't we dependent on some CLI / entrypoint stuff getting out of oslo.policy? 21:04:22 <alaski> the things we need are already there 21:04:26 <jaypipes> o/ 21:04:31 <alaski> the entrypoint stuff needs to go in nova 21:05:03 <mriedem> so effective policy and duplicates is already in oslo.policy? 21:05:14 <alaski> yes 21:05:20 <mriedem> and released? 21:05:31 <mriedem> and g-r'ed? 21:05:33 <mriedem> oh my 21:05:36 <alaski> now, I do need to get it working fully because there was some odness with configs I didn't expect 21:05:38 <alaski> mriedem: yep 21:05:48 <alaski> so small fixes may be needed 21:05:56 <mriedem> ok 21:06:06 <mriedem> we've got 2 weeks 21:06:11 <alaski> noted 21:06:23 <mriedem> any questions from anyone else on schedules? 21:06:37 <mriedem> just a reminder that 9/2 is n-3 and feature freeze 21:06:42 <mriedem> so 3 weeks away 21:06:53 <jaypipes> 4 weeks. 21:06:54 <mriedem> well more like 4 21:06:55 <mriedem> yeah 21:07:01 <mriedem> let's pretend it's 3 21:07:19 <mriedem> #topic bugs 21:07:29 <mriedem> gate is a-ok 21:07:44 <mriedem> i still have to sort out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349014/ 21:07:54 <mriedem> so we can re-enable the test that was failing last week 21:08:06 <mriedem> danpb gave me some pointers though 21:08:23 <mriedem> in third party ci status, Intel NFV CI is voting now 21:08:32 <mriedem> wznoinsk is on the hook for that 21:08:42 <mriedem> so speak up if anyone sees any weirdness 21:09:05 <mriedem> no critical bugs 21:09:07 <mriedem> moving on 21:09:12 <mriedem> #topic reminders 21:09:21 <mriedem> #link Newton review focus list: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-nova-priorities-tracking 21:09:30 <mriedem> #help https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Weekly_bug_skimming_duty Volunteers for 1 week of bug skimming duty? 21:09:47 <mriedem> looks like next week is open for bug triage 21:09:58 <mriedem> #topic stable branch status 21:10:18 <mriedem> did a stable/mitaka review push the last 2 days and have a 13.1.1 release request up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351400/ 21:10:39 <mriedem> #topic subteam highlights 21:10:49 <mriedem> alaski: cellsv2 meeting news? 21:11:05 <alaski> mostly we discussed patches under review 21:11:13 <alaski> progress on most fronts 21:11:28 <alaski> I have a few patches I'm currently working on, otherwise everything for N seems up 21:11:46 <alaski> that's about all I can recall 21:12:02 <alaski> oh 21:12:09 <alaski> we need some grenade testing 21:12:26 <alaski> I need to pester the responsible party on that 21:12:38 <mriedem> he who cannot be named 21:12:45 <alaski> but we should get that in N to make our lives easier for O 21:12:48 * dansmith wonders who we're talking about 21:12:52 <mriedem> satan 21:12:56 <mriedem> we're talking about satan 21:13:05 * Vek was thinking Voldemort 21:13:07 <auggy> the flying spaghetti monster 21:13:08 <dansmith> oh good, as long as it's not me, I'm good 21:13:18 <alaski> I have some bad news... 21:13:27 <alaski> anyways, that's all 21:13:30 <Vek> hehe :) 21:13:36 <mriedem> i thought there was more to that 21:13:39 <mriedem> ok 21:13:41 <jlvillal> o/ 21:13:45 <jaypipes> mriedem: from the scheduler/resource tracker side of things, we're progressing pretty well. got the aggregate metadata to api db patches in and there are about 35 or so patches outstanding in review from me, cdent, and dansmith around the REST API and objects work. Hoping now that Chris is back to work that we'll push forward and get reviews done over the next week. 21:14:12 * jaypipes has to run and drop jules off at a restaurant... :( will be back shortly. 21:14:17 <mriedem> thanks 21:14:36 <mriedem> alaski: dansmith: speaking of, i'm close on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300177/ just need to review the latest 21:14:40 <mriedem> but should be good to get in today 21:14:53 <mriedem> i don't know where we're sitting with dynamic resource classes and such 21:14:57 <alaski> okay, I'll rereview 21:15:25 <mriedem> live migration meeting, was anyone there? 21:15:29 <mriedem> i didn't make it 21:15:55 <mriedem> i see tdurakov has a change up to add nfs back to the live migration job 21:15:58 <mriedem> but it was failing last night 21:16:11 <mriedem> otherwise all review should probably just be on mdbooth's imagebackend refactor series 21:16:25 <mriedem> sdague: you around? 21:16:44 <mriedem> for the api meeting, 21:16:57 <mriedem> we mostly talked about the os-interface deprecation thread/spec and decided to defer that to ocata 21:17:08 <mriedem> and gmann's imageRef uuid fix is merged 21:17:25 <mriedem> the other thing is the user_id policy enforcement spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324068/ 21:18:05 <mriedem> we also need to resolve https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1609039 21:18:05 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1609039 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Should not be able to sort instances based on joined tables" [High,Triaged] 21:18:11 <mriedem> which doesn't have an owner yet 21:18:35 <mriedem> lbeliveau: was there an sriov/pci meeting this week? 21:18:53 <mikal> . 21:18:53 <mriedem> alright moving on 21:18:55 <lbeliveau> mriedem: yes, but it was pretty quick 21:19:00 <mriedem> lbeliveau: ah ok 21:19:15 <mriedem> lbeliveau: anything you want to mention? 21:19:18 <lbeliveau> we landed a few patches for migration 21:19:30 <lbeliveau> no, good for now 21:19:33 <mriedem> ok 21:19:37 <mriedem> #topic stuck reviews 21:19:42 <mriedem> there was nothing on the agenda 21:19:50 <mriedem> #topic open discussion 21:19:56 <mriedem> nothing on the agenda, so i'll open it up 21:20:01 <hemna> mriedem, hey 21:20:16 <mriedem> yessir 21:20:23 <hemna> so I just filed a bug against detach for shelved instance 21:20:37 <hemna> there was a tempest tests that had a skip removed recently 21:20:46 <hemna> and now it's breaking several cinder 3rd party CIs 21:20:52 <mriedem> link? 21:20:55 <hemna> because the detach is passing a bogus connector 21:21:02 <hemna> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1609984 21:21:02 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1609984 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "volume-detach fails for shelved instance" [Undecided,New] 21:21:08 <hemna> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339472/ 21:21:11 <scottda> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339472/ 21:21:16 <mriedem> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/257853/ ? 21:21:18 <hemna> that's the patch that just removed the skip 21:21:35 <mriedem> so revert the tempest patch? 21:21:41 <hemna> I think so yah 21:21:56 <hemna> I don't see how this will work until detach for shelved can get fixed 21:22:13 <mriedem> ok 21:22:25 <mriedem> i think andrearosa has done some work in this area so he might know more 21:22:36 <mriedem> but i'd have to dig into the bug i guess 21:22:40 <hemna> ok 21:22:48 <mriedem> #help https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1609984 is breaking cinder 3rd party CIs 21:22:50 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1609984 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "volume-detach fails for shelved instance" [Undecided,New] 21:22:51 <hemna> I just wanted to raise it here with you guys. 21:23:25 <mriedem> ok, should probably drop that in the -qa channel also 21:23:58 <mriedem> in the meantime, 21:24:04 <mriedem> tempest can be configured to not run shelve tests 21:24:20 <hemna> we are going to just add a skip in our CI for now as a quick fix 21:24:21 <mriedem> anything else for open discussion? 21:24:26 <hemna> we've been failing 100% since that landed 21:24:31 <lbeliveau> yes quick one 21:24:51 <lbeliveau> forgot, we got jays +2, would need another core to look at it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/328983/ 21:25:43 <mriedem> lbeliveau: is ci covering that? 21:25:58 <Vek> lbeliveau: reviewed 21:26:09 <mriedem> heh oh well nevermind 21:26:16 <lbeliveau> mriedem: not yet, we proposed a tempest, but it's not merged yet 21:26:25 <mriedem> ok 21:26:33 <mriedem> i wasn't sure if this was one of those cases where resize on local would test it 21:26:49 <lbeliveau> thanks ! 21:27:09 <mriedem> alright, if nothing else, we'll call it a meeting 21:27:20 <mriedem> thanks everyone 21:27:22 <mriedem> #endmeeting