14:00:31 <mriedem> #startmeeting nova
14:00:35 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Sep  8 14:00:31 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mriedem. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:36 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:39 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
14:00:43 <alaski> o/
14:00:44 <dansmith> o/
14:00:45 <johnthetubaguy> o/
14:00:52 <cdent> o/
14:00:59 <lbeliveau> o/
14:01:00 <sdague> o/
14:01:00 <takashin> o/
14:01:09 <jroll> \o
14:01:12 <BobBall> o/
14:01:18 <mriedem> #link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
14:01:21 <edleafe> \o
14:01:35 <mriedem> #topic release news
14:01:37 <woodster_> o/
14:01:42 <mriedem> #link Newton release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Newton_Release_Schedule
14:01:45 <bauzas> \o
14:01:51 <mriedem> #info Sep 12-16: PTL self-nominations open for Ocata
14:02:02 <mriedem> that's next week
14:02:04 <mriedem> #info Sep 15: RC1 - 1 week from today
14:02:28 <mriedem> so be on the lookout for blocking bugs for the release
14:02:35 <mriedem> i know bauzas has been doing some bug triage, i've been trying to also
14:02:38 <jaypipes> o/
14:02:53 <mriedem> anything that looks potentially stop ship tag it with 'newton-rc-potential'
14:02:55 <bauzas> yeah, nothing really urgent I've seen so far but a couple of bugs we need to merge tho
14:03:07 <mriedem> let's move on to bugs
14:03:08 <mriedem> #topic bugs
14:03:14 <mriedem> #link newton-rc-potential bugs (13): https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=newton-rc-potential
14:03:19 <mriedem> that's our current list
14:03:20 <bauzas> and I still need to iterate over that newton-rc-potential list which contained the last time I looked 13 bugs
14:03:23 <bauzas> heh, jinxed
14:03:30 <mriedem> yup, i need to scrub through it today too
14:04:13 <mriedem> i think there are some plancement api patches that we want to get into rc1, but i'm not sure if they are tied to bugs or not
14:04:22 <mriedem> i haven't been following along all that closely with the latest changes there
14:04:28 <dansmith> mriedem: I've got a list going
14:04:36 <mriedem> dansmith: jaypipes: cdent: sdague: are those things marked with bugs?
14:04:49 <dansmith> mriedem: we have a really bad discrepancy between the GET and PUT of some payloads which we really need to resolve
14:04:55 <dansmith> mriedem: I made the list so we could file bugs
14:05:04 <dansmith> but we don't have bugs yet, AFAIK
14:05:12 <jaypipes> dansmith: ty for making that list.
14:05:14 <mriedem> ok, let's get those bugs opened and tagged so they are on everyone's radar with that list above
14:05:22 <dansmith> aye
14:05:36 <jaypipes> dansmith, mriedem: can we add a topic to the meeting today to make a decision on the GET/PUT discrep?
14:05:46 <mriedem> jaypipes: yeah let's handle that in open discussion
14:05:52 <dansmith> jaypipes: I was going to suggest another hangout thing to sync up and talk about that
14:05:55 <dansmith> but whichever
14:06:02 <mriedem> hangouts are also good
14:06:13 <mriedem> let's revisit in open
14:06:16 <mriedem> gate status
14:06:17 <mriedem> #link check queue gate status http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html
14:06:21 <mriedem> nothing shocking there
14:06:43 <mriedem> 3rd party ci has been ok as far as i can tell, at least on master
14:06:50 <mriedem> there have been some hiccups on stable branches that are being sorted out
14:06:57 * BobBall hangs his head in shame
14:06:57 <mriedem> we have 0 critical bugs
14:07:17 <mriedem> finally for bugs
14:07:18 <mriedem> #info markus_z is no longer running the bug meetings, looking for people to run those (maybe tdurakov and/or auggy)
14:07:53 <mriedem> i'm less concerned about who holds the almighty title of bug captain and more about who's doing the work and herding the cats
14:07:59 <bauzas> right
14:08:10 <bauzas> anyone can run a meeting anyway
14:08:12 <mriedem> the latter gets you the former
14:08:20 <bauzas> no need for some formal title blessing
14:08:30 <jaypipes> dansmith: either way, sure.
14:08:48 <mriedem> any questions about bugs/ci?
14:09:03 <mriedem> #topic reminders
14:09:06 <mriedem> #link Etherpad for Ocata summit topics: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-nova-summit-ideas
14:09:21 <jaypipes> dansmith: I have an 11am meeting and a company all hands (which I will just be listening to) but otherwise pretty free today to heads-down on placement
14:09:35 <mriedem> again, i figure we'll dig more into topics for the summit after RC1
14:09:46 <mriedem> #link Newton review focus list: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-nova-priorities-tracking
14:09:56 <mriedem> ^ is probably less important right now
14:09:59 <mriedem> focus should be on bugs
14:10:09 <mriedem> #help https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Weekly_bug_skimming_duty Volunteers for 1 week of bug skimming duty?
14:10:22 <bauzas> heh
14:10:31 <mriedem> #topic stable branch status
14:10:41 <mriedem> there are some stable/mitaka patches that have a +2 and are ready to go
14:10:54 <mriedem> otherwise nothing really news worthy here
14:11:15 <mriedem> #topic subteam highlights
14:11:34 <mriedem> in the interest of time, i think i'm going to skip these unless anyone has any burning issues to bring up from this week's meetings
14:11:44 <mriedem> edleafe: alex_xu: PaulMurray: ^
14:11:47 <alaski> not for cells
14:11:54 <dansmith> +1 for skip
14:11:54 <edleafe> Just if anyone wants to track the placement work: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-next
14:12:18 <mriedem> ok
14:12:21 <mriedem> #topic stuck reviews
14:12:30 <mriedem> there was nothing on the agenda
14:12:42 <mriedem> #topic open discussion
14:12:52 <mriedem> jaypipes: dansmith: did you want to go over placement stuff here?
14:12:59 <dansmith> I'd rather do a hangout,
14:13:02 <dansmith> but whatever people want
14:13:05 <jaypipes> mriedem: hangout is finew.
14:13:20 <mriedem> ok what time?
14:13:20 <abhishekk> hi all, please review this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355091/, it is about '
14:13:20 <abhishekk> Make req spec and RT aware of volume-backed instances'
14:13:20 <patchbot> patch 355091 - nova - Make req spec and RT aware of volume-backed instances
14:13:34 <cdent> jaypipes, dansmith: whatever we do can we be sure it ends up in something written down, like to that email thread or the etherpad?
14:13:34 <edleafe> hangouts seem to accomplish more
14:13:43 <johnthetubaguy> let us know how I can help with reviews and stuff tomorrow morning, but tracked bugs sounded good
14:13:46 <dansmith> cdent: haven't we been doing that?
14:13:50 <johnthetubaguy> what cdent said
14:14:08 <cdent> dansmith: sometimes there's some latency, but mostly yes, just reinforcing
14:14:26 <mriedem> abhishekk: that makes me nervous at this point in the schedule, looks complicated and it's a latent bug
14:14:31 <mriedem> i'd rather wait for ocata for that one
14:14:47 <dansmith> mriedem: in ocata we may very well have solved it with placement too.. solved it correctly
14:15:04 <johnthetubaguy> +1 both of those points
14:15:06 <abhishekk> mriedem: actually we need to backport it to mitaka
14:15:09 <dansmith> and yes, latent since $forever
14:15:46 <mriedem> abhishekk: unless it was a regression in mitaka, i'm not sure we *need* to backport it
14:16:15 <mriedem> i'm not keen on backporting 400+ LOC patches
14:16:49 <dansmith> there's really no sane explanation for backporting that, IMHO
14:17:04 <dansmith> not a regression, complex, large, affects lots of stuff
14:17:45 <bauzas> yeah, I don't see the need for backporting that upstream
14:17:57 <mriedem> ok so jaypipes is on a call in 42 minutes,
14:18:02 <mriedem> is the hangout before or after that?
14:18:10 <jaypipes> mriedem: like to do it before pls.
14:18:12 <dansmith> I think we could manage before, but whatever
14:18:15 <mriedem> ok
14:18:19 <mriedem> then let's wrap this up
14:18:21 <mriedem> thanks everyone
14:18:23 <mriedem> #endmeeting