14:00:31 #startmeeting nova 14:00:35 Meeting started Thu Sep 8 14:00:31 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mriedem. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:39 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 14:00:43 o/ 14:00:44 o/ 14:00:45 o/ 14:00:52 o/ 14:00:59 o/ 14:01:00 o/ 14:01:00 o/ 14:01:09 \o 14:01:12 o/ 14:01:18 #link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting 14:01:21 \o 14:01:35 #topic release news 14:01:37 o/ 14:01:42 #link Newton release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Newton_Release_Schedule 14:01:45 \o 14:01:51 #info Sep 12-16: PTL self-nominations open for Ocata 14:02:02 that's next week 14:02:04 #info Sep 15: RC1 - 1 week from today 14:02:28 so be on the lookout for blocking bugs for the release 14:02:35 i know bauzas has been doing some bug triage, i've been trying to also 14:02:38 o/ 14:02:53 anything that looks potentially stop ship tag it with 'newton-rc-potential' 14:02:55 yeah, nothing really urgent I've seen so far but a couple of bugs we need to merge tho 14:03:07 let's move on to bugs 14:03:08 #topic bugs 14:03:14 #link newton-rc-potential bugs (13): https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=newton-rc-potential 14:03:19 that's our current list 14:03:20 and I still need to iterate over that newton-rc-potential list which contained the last time I looked 13 bugs 14:03:23 heh, jinxed 14:03:30 yup, i need to scrub through it today too 14:04:13 i think there are some plancement api patches that we want to get into rc1, but i'm not sure if they are tied to bugs or not 14:04:22 i haven't been following along all that closely with the latest changes there 14:04:28 mriedem: I've got a list going 14:04:36 dansmith: jaypipes: cdent: sdague: are those things marked with bugs? 14:04:49 mriedem: we have a really bad discrepancy between the GET and PUT of some payloads which we really need to resolve 14:04:55 mriedem: I made the list so we could file bugs 14:05:04 but we don't have bugs yet, AFAIK 14:05:12 dansmith: ty for making that list. 14:05:14 ok, let's get those bugs opened and tagged so they are on everyone's radar with that list above 14:05:22 aye 14:05:36 dansmith, mriedem: can we add a topic to the meeting today to make a decision on the GET/PUT discrep? 14:05:46 jaypipes: yeah let's handle that in open discussion 14:05:52 jaypipes: I was going to suggest another hangout thing to sync up and talk about that 14:05:55 but whichever 14:06:02 hangouts are also good 14:06:13 let's revisit in open 14:06:16 gate status 14:06:17 #link check queue gate status http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html 14:06:21 nothing shocking there 14:06:43 3rd party ci has been ok as far as i can tell, at least on master 14:06:50 there have been some hiccups on stable branches that are being sorted out 14:06:57 * BobBall hangs his head in shame 14:06:57 we have 0 critical bugs 14:07:17 finally for bugs 14:07:18 #info markus_z is no longer running the bug meetings, looking for people to run those (maybe tdurakov and/or auggy) 14:07:53 i'm less concerned about who holds the almighty title of bug captain and more about who's doing the work and herding the cats 14:07:59 right 14:08:10 anyone can run a meeting anyway 14:08:12 the latter gets you the former 14:08:20 no need for some formal title blessing 14:08:30 dansmith: either way, sure. 14:08:48 any questions about bugs/ci? 14:09:03 #topic reminders 14:09:06 #link Etherpad for Ocata summit topics: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ocata-nova-summit-ideas 14:09:21 dansmith: I have an 11am meeting and a company all hands (which I will just be listening to) but otherwise pretty free today to heads-down on placement 14:09:35 again, i figure we'll dig more into topics for the summit after RC1 14:09:46 #link Newton review focus list: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-nova-priorities-tracking 14:09:56 ^ is probably less important right now 14:09:59 focus should be on bugs 14:10:09 #help https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Weekly_bug_skimming_duty Volunteers for 1 week of bug skimming duty? 14:10:22 heh 14:10:31 #topic stable branch status 14:10:41 there are some stable/mitaka patches that have a +2 and are ready to go 14:10:54 otherwise nothing really news worthy here 14:11:15 #topic subteam highlights 14:11:34 in the interest of time, i think i'm going to skip these unless anyone has any burning issues to bring up from this week's meetings 14:11:44 edleafe: alex_xu: PaulMurray: ^ 14:11:47 not for cells 14:11:54 +1 for skip 14:11:54 Just if anyone wants to track the placement work: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/placement-next 14:12:18 ok 14:12:21 #topic stuck reviews 14:12:30 there was nothing on the agenda 14:12:42 #topic open discussion 14:12:52 jaypipes: dansmith: did you want to go over placement stuff here? 14:12:59 I'd rather do a hangout, 14:13:02 but whatever people want 14:13:05 mriedem: hangout is finew. 14:13:20 ok what time? 14:13:20 hi all, please review this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/355091/, it is about ' 14:13:20 Make req spec and RT aware of volume-backed instances' 14:13:20 patch 355091 - nova - Make req spec and RT aware of volume-backed instances 14:13:34 jaypipes, dansmith: whatever we do can we be sure it ends up in something written down, like to that email thread or the etherpad? 14:13:34 hangouts seem to accomplish more 14:13:43 let us know how I can help with reviews and stuff tomorrow morning, but tracked bugs sounded good 14:13:46 cdent: haven't we been doing that? 14:13:50 what cdent said 14:14:08 dansmith: sometimes there's some latency, but mostly yes, just reinforcing 14:14:26 abhishekk: that makes me nervous at this point in the schedule, looks complicated and it's a latent bug 14:14:31 i'd rather wait for ocata for that one 14:14:47 mriedem: in ocata we may very well have solved it with placement too.. solved it correctly 14:15:04 +1 both of those points 14:15:06 mriedem: actually we need to backport it to mitaka 14:15:09 and yes, latent since $forever 14:15:46 abhishekk: unless it was a regression in mitaka, i'm not sure we *need* to backport it 14:16:15 i'm not keen on backporting 400+ LOC patches 14:16:49 there's really no sane explanation for backporting that, IMHO 14:17:04 not a regression, complex, large, affects lots of stuff 14:17:45 yeah, I don't see the need for backporting that upstream 14:17:57 ok so jaypipes is on a call in 42 minutes, 14:18:02 is the hangout before or after that? 14:18:10 mriedem: like to do it before pls. 14:18:12 I think we could manage before, but whatever 14:18:15 ok 14:18:19 then let's wrap this up 14:18:21 thanks everyone 14:18:23 #endmeeting