14:00:23 <gibi> #startmeeting nova
14:00:26 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb  8 14:00:23 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:28 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:30 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
14:00:34 <efried> @/
14:00:40 <gibi> hi! I will be your host today
14:00:41 <takashin> o/
14:00:45 <bauzas> _o
14:00:50 <bauzas> \o (even)
14:01:19 <edleafe> \o
14:01:26 <lyarwood> \o
14:01:37 <gibi> mriedem update the agend on the wiki and I will try to walk through it
14:01:42 <gibi> *updated
14:02:01 <edmondsw> o/
14:02:04 <mriedem> o/
14:02:33 <gibi> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
14:02:39 <gibi> let's get started
14:02:42 <gibi> #topic release news
14:02:53 <gibi> #link Queens release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Queens_Release_Schedule
14:03:00 <gibi> #info Feb 8: Queens release candidate 1
14:03:04 <gibi> which is today
14:03:55 <gibi> If I understand correclty we have two weeks to test the RC1 and release additional RCs if needed
14:04:20 <bauzas> partially correct https://releases.openstack.org/queens/schedule.html
14:04:34 <bauzas> we are R-3
14:04:54 <mriedem> 2/22 is the final day for RCs
14:04:56 <mriedem> so yes gibi is right
14:05:09 <bauzas> I agree, hence partially
14:05:10 <stephenfin> o/
14:05:15 <bauzas> because R+0 is the GA
14:05:27 <bauzas> anyway
14:05:42 <gibi> #info Blueprints: 41 completed out of 53 approved (77% completion rate); the rest have been deferred to Rocky; mriedem will send the burndown chart details to the ML.
14:06:11 <gibi> This feels like a nice progress
14:06:28 <gibi> #link Queens RC1 TODOs: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-queens-release-candidate-todo
14:06:52 <gibi> there are couple of open patches in the etherpad to look at
14:07:20 <mriedem> my goal for rc1 today,
14:07:24 <mriedem> is the prelude release note,
14:07:31 <mriedem> and dansmith's compute rpc versoin bump patch
14:07:35 <mriedem> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541005/
14:07:48 <mriedem> then i think i'm going to cut it
14:08:08 <gibi> sounds doable :)
14:08:19 <bauzas> mriedem: I was reviewing dansmith's compute RPC patch
14:08:20 <gibi> any questions comments on the RC1 ?
14:09:10 <gibi> then moving to bugs
14:09:12 <gibi> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
14:09:18 <gibi> #link queens-rc-potential bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=queens-rc-potential
14:09:46 <gibi> there are two bugs on the list
14:09:56 <mriedem> i'm cleaning up my patch for the 2nd one,
14:10:07 <bauzas> I haven't seen any other crucial bug when triaging
14:10:11 <mriedem> the first, the non-ascii one, i wonder if that's a regression or not, because if it's not a regression, it's not an rc1 blocker
14:10:17 <gibi> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541008/
14:10:33 <mriedem> just updated ^
14:11:40 <gibi> It seems we don't have any critical bugs
14:11:44 <edmondsw> I didn't open a bug for this, but https://review.openstack.org/#/c/540534/ has a bunch of support matrix fixes we might want to get in
14:12:13 <mriedem> yikes, i'm not reviewing that today
14:12:29 <mriedem> people generally read docs from the latest published version, so that's fine to just get on master later
14:12:34 <edmondsw> yeah, it was pretty comprehensive... thought about splitting it up, but part of the point was consistency...
14:12:38 <bauzas> edmondsw: okay, will look for today if possible
14:13:11 <gibi> #info 51 new untriaged bugs (up 3 since the last meeting)
14:13:14 <bauzas> no
14:13:25 <bauzas> 36 new untriaged bugs
14:13:38 <gibi> bauzas: then thanks for your triaging effort
14:13:52 <gibi> #info 36 new untriaged bugs
14:14:03 <bauzas> I'd love to see that down to less than 10 before we cut the release
14:15:30 <gibi> bauzas: totally make sense. I will try to look at some as well
14:15:38 <gibi> #link check queue gate status http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html
14:16:06 <gibi> I don't see issue with the gate today
14:16:32 <gibi> #link 3rd party CI status http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project?project=nova&time=7+days
14:16:47 <gibi> the nova-next job seems to be failing consistently
14:16:56 <mriedem> the glanceclient workaround rc1 patch fixes nova-next
14:17:00 <mriedem> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/541008/
14:17:13 <efried> ++
14:17:23 <efried> That's ready for some cores IMO
14:17:36 <gibi> I will look at it after the meeting
14:17:45 <gibi> seems small and easy
14:18:08 <gibi> any other questions / comments about bugs or CI ?
14:19:07 <gibi> then moving to reminders
14:19:12 <gibi> #topic Reminders
14:19:19 <gibi> #link Today is the last day for Rocky summit talk proposals: https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/call-for-presentations/
14:19:50 <bauzas> isn't that closed already ?
14:20:00 <bauzas> I thought it was 12am ET
14:20:19 <mriedem> when i updated the agenda last night, it was 'today' :)
14:20:19 <gibi> there is a green Add New Presentation button on the page
14:20:27 <gibi> so it is not closed yet
14:20:38 <bauzas> snap, nevermind
14:20:49 <edleafe> bauzas: 23:59 PST
14:21:14 <bauzas> after 15 years working with international people, I can't still handle timezones
14:21:44 <gibi> we should ban timezones
14:21:48 <gibi> #link Rocky PTG topics: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-rocky
14:22:07 <gibi> I think mriedem mentioned that he will structure the etherpad a bit after RC1
14:22:42 <efried> Should melwitt be doing that instead?  :P
14:23:34 <gibi> I don't know what is the cut off date for the PTL change :)
14:23:53 <efried> Maybe melwitt delegated the task to mriedem :D
14:24:02 <efried> <whip cracks>
14:24:40 <efried> okay, okay, our esteemed leadership is not rising to the bait; they must be busy with actual work.
14:24:49 <gibi> anything else we need to remember?
14:25:14 <gibi> then, stable branches
14:25:17 <gibi> #topic Stable branch status
14:25:26 <gibi> #link stable/pike: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/pike,n,z
14:26:03 <gibi> #link stable/ocata: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/ocata,n,z
14:26:07 <mriedem> i will likely go through some of those and then cut a stable release
14:26:24 <mriedem> several are backports from me and have a +2 so i can't approve them
14:26:30 <mriedem> or shouldn't
14:26:45 <bauzas> next week for me
14:27:32 <gibi> anything else for the stable status?
14:27:57 <gibi> then subteam highlights
14:28:01 <gibi> #topic Subteam Highlights
14:28:09 <gibi> Cells v2
14:28:22 <mriedem> there wasn't much,
14:28:26 <mriedem> just some bug fixes for latent issues
14:28:40 <mriedem> they are linked into the rc1 etherpad but since they are latent we can backport them later too
14:28:41 <gibi> there are couple patches linked to the Queens TODO etherpad
14:28:44 <mriedem> i won't hold rc1 for them
14:29:04 <gibi> mriedem: thanks
14:29:33 <gibi> Scheduler
14:29:37 <edleafe> Spent most of our time discussing some latent bugs due to inconsistent handling of generations for resource providers. Agreed that generation handling will be an excellent PTG topic.
14:29:41 <edleafe> We also discussed cdent's experiments on extracting placement from Nova.
14:29:44 <edleafe> efried and I are submitting a "State of Placement" talk for Vancouver. Now  if we can only figure out how to get travel approval...
14:29:47 <edleafe> EOF
14:30:23 <gibi> edleafe: thanks
14:30:31 <gibi> Notification
14:30:39 <gibi> that is me
14:30:40 <bauzas> edleafe: TSP is open till end of March IIRC
14:31:06 <gibi> only a short meeting
14:31:10 <bauzas> I mean, one or two weeks after the final talks choice
14:31:23 <gibi> we discussed two specless bp
14:31:38 <gibi> I will bring them up in the Open discussion topic
14:31:45 <gibi> EOF
14:32:00 <gibi> hm, what happened with the other subteams? they are not on the agenda
14:32:13 <mriedem> i removed cinder
14:32:23 <mriedem> nothing to report there, no meetings before the ptg
14:32:32 <mriedem> working through docs and bugs
14:32:49 <mriedem> and no one is ever here to report on the api meeting
14:32:51 <mriedem> if it still happens
14:33:06 <gibi> OK
14:33:18 <gibi> then moving forward
14:33:29 <gibi> #topic Stuck Reviews
14:33:35 <gibi> nothing on the agenda
14:34:11 <gibi> do we have anything to talk about here?
14:34:17 <mriedem> nope
14:34:23 <gibi> then
14:34:25 <gibi> #topic Open discussion
14:34:38 <gibi> [02.07.][gibi]: Let's quickly agree on the specless bluperint: trigger notifications when lock or unlock instances #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/trigger-notifications-when-lock-unlock-instances
14:34:57 <gibi> There is lock and unlock instance actions in nova
14:35:06 <gibi> but we don't emit notifications for them
14:35:16 <efried> s/excepted/expected/ and I'm +1
14:35:19 <mriedem> +1
14:35:27 <mriedem> it's an instance action, all other actions have notifications
14:35:27 <bauzas> fine with me
14:36:03 <gibi> I can help with the implementation and the review
14:36:52 <gibi> seems the we agree to approve this
14:37:10 <gibi> then moving forward to next on the agenda
14:37:18 <gibi> [02.07.][gibi]: Let's quickly agree on another specless blueprint: Add the user id and project id of the user initiated the instance action to the notification #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/add-action-initiator-to-instance-action-notifications
14:37:45 <gibi> today the notifications contain the user_id and the project_id of the _owner_ of the instance
14:38:10 <gibi> but the instance action we are notifying about might be initiated by another user
14:38:22 <mriedem> i think this one is OK
14:38:24 <efried> +1, pending excruciating naming bikeshed
14:38:44 <gibi> efried: bikeshed can happen in the review
14:39:15 <gibi> I can be the driver for this bp as well
14:40:32 <gibi> seem like no objections :)
14:40:49 <gibi> this was the last item on the agenda
14:41:01 <gibi> any other thing to bring up?
14:41:31 <gibi> seem no
14:41:40 <gibi> let's get back to shaping the RC1
14:41:58 <gibi> #endmeeting