21:01:29 <melwitt> #startmeeting nova
21:01:30 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb 15 21:01:29 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is melwitt. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
21:01:31 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
21:01:34 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
21:01:36 <mriedem> o/
21:01:37 <edmondsw> o/
21:01:38 <efried> @/
21:01:38 <melwitt> howdy everyone, welcome to the nova meeting
21:01:38 <tssurya> o/\
21:01:39 <edleafe> \o
21:01:40 <dansmith> o/
21:01:41 <takashin> o/
21:01:57 <efried> tssurya brought katana
21:02:06 <tssurya> efried: :D
21:02:18 <melwitt> #link agenda for this meeting: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
21:02:27 <melwitt> #topic release news
21:02:35 <melwitt> #link Queens release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Queens_Release_Schedule
21:02:56 <melwitt> I think we're going to have an rc2 for queens
21:03:02 <melwitt> #link Queens RC2 TODOs: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-queens-release-candidate-todo
21:03:08 <mriedem> yes
21:03:22 <melwitt> last I checked, there was one item/bug there
21:03:22 <mriedem> i need to scrub which patches we want to include
21:03:29 <mriedem> the powervm one is a regression triggering rc2
21:03:39 <mriedem> so while we do that, i'll see which other patches we should include
21:03:42 <mriedem> depending on risk
21:04:02 <melwitt> okay, cool
21:04:13 <melwitt> #link Queens blueprint burndown chart by mriedem: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-February/127402.html
21:04:31 <melwitt> mriedem sent a burndown chart report to the ML yesterday
21:05:06 <melwitt> we had a 70% completion percentage of blueprints in queens
21:05:10 <melwitt> *79%
21:05:30 <melwitt> which was an improvement from pike with 72% completion percentage
21:05:47 <melwitt> good info there, thanks for mriedem for putting it together
21:05:53 <mriedem> \o/
21:06:14 <melwitt> I've created a wiki with the rocky release schedule dates
21:06:15 <melwitt> #link Rocky release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Rocky_Release_Schedule
21:06:36 <melwitt> so do check that out for the milestone info for this cycle
21:06:51 <melwitt> finally, ocata is going EOL soon
21:06:56 <melwitt> #info Ocata enters Phase 3, security fixes only, EOL on 2018-02-26
21:07:10 <melwitt> any questions about release stuff?
21:07:18 <mriedem> EOL?
21:07:38 <mriedem> hmm
21:07:39 <melwitt> yeah, that's what I saw on the schedule
21:07:43 * melwitt gets link
21:07:46 <mriedem> it was a short cycle
21:07:48 <mriedem> https://releases.openstack.org/
21:07:49 <mriedem> i see it
21:07:56 <mriedem> i'm just surprised, or had forgotten
21:08:01 <melwitt> ah, yeah. I was surprised too
21:08:09 <mriedem> given it took way longer to EOL newton,
21:08:16 <dansmith> well, newton EOL stretched on for a long time
21:08:18 <mriedem> i don't expect ocata to be EOL by that date, but we'll see
21:08:40 <mriedem> remember, LTS is just as easy as not telling tonyb to EOL anything
21:08:41 <melwitt> I don't expect it either. but just FYI
21:08:50 <melwitt> haha, right
21:09:14 <melwitt> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
21:09:23 <melwitt> #link queens-rc-potential bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=queens-rc-potential
21:09:36 <melwitt> bugs we are considering for rc2 should be tagged with this
21:09:48 <melwitt> and there are none right now
21:09:50 <edmondsw> I'll add that to the powervm bug
21:09:53 <melwitt> well, none open
21:10:12 <edmondsw> hmm... already is
21:10:15 <edmondsw> thought I had
21:10:22 <melwitt> I think it's already tagged but doesn't show up in the query because it's fixed/closed
21:10:22 <melwitt> yeah
21:10:30 <edmondsw> right, for master but not for stable/queens
21:10:39 <edmondsw> so that's a nice little hold
21:10:41 <edmondsw> hole*
21:10:52 <melwitt> oh, I see. okay
21:10:57 <mriedem> well, you can do an advanced search to find it
21:11:19 <melwitt> yeah, maybe I can make that link better to find more stuff
21:11:35 <melwitt> no critical bugs in the critical bug search, so that's good
21:11:42 <melwitt> #info 32 new untriaged bugs (down 19 since the last meeting)
21:12:06 <melwitt> thanks to those who have been triaging bugs, that's a good improvement
21:12:14 <melwitt> #link bug triage how-to: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Tags
21:12:40 <melwitt> if you'd like to help with bug triage, please see this guide on how-to. the easiest thing people can do is tag bugs with a category
21:12:51 <melwitt> that helps a lot to sort things into buckets that domain experts can then triage
21:12:57 <melwitt> #link untagged untriaged bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=-*&field.status%3Alist=NEW
21:13:15 <melwitt> so there are the untagged bugs ^ we have 13 right now
21:13:23 <melwitt> #help tag untagged untriaged bugs with appropriate tags to categorize them
21:13:24 <mriedem> fwiw, i don't domain experts do any bug triage once tagged
21:13:44 <mriedem> your best chance of getting someone to push a fix is probably during triage, but..
21:13:53 <mriedem> *don't think
21:14:11 <mriedem> i blame the ptl
21:14:19 <melwitt> yeah. I try to monitor some of the tags and triage but I'm not great about it
21:14:42 <melwitt> so ... it would be really cool if people took a look at some of the tags and try to help triage tags that they know :)
21:14:47 <melwitt> #help consider signing up as a bug tag owner and help determine the validity and severity of bugs with your tag
21:15:14 <melwitt> #link check queue gate status http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html
21:15:28 <melwitt> gate has been working fairly well lately, AFAICT
21:15:42 <melwitt> #link 3rd party CI status http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project?project=nova&time=7+days
21:15:57 <melwitt> I feel like I've been seeing a lot of third party CI fails these days
21:16:20 <melwitt> so probably need to ping some people and see what's going on
21:16:31 <melwitt> any questions about bugs or gate status?
21:16:51 <melwitt> #topic Reminders
21:16:57 <melwitt> #link Rocky PTG topics: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-rocky
21:17:30 <melwitt> here's our etherpad for the PTG. please do check it out for info on topics being covered and some agenda scheduling for thursday
21:17:46 <melwitt> we have time scheduled with the neutron, ironic, and cinder teams
21:18:01 <melwitt> going to be a busy day
21:18:07 <melwitt> #link Queens retrospective: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-queens-retrospective
21:18:42 <melwitt> we're going to have a queens retrospective at the PTG. I was thinking maybe we should start with that on wednesday, since any takeaways might apply to our later discussions
21:19:02 <melwitt> take a browse on the etherpad and add your thoughts and topics to cover at the PTG
21:19:24 <melwitt> #link Rocky spec proposals: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/readme.html
21:19:49 <melwitt> rocky spec proposals are getting well under way, so now's the time to write and propose your specs. please see ^ for instructions how
21:20:11 <melwitt> and finally, we're signed up to take a team photo at the PTG, FYI
21:20:12 <melwitt> #info nova team photo at 11:10-11:20 on Thursday morning at the PTG
21:20:27 <melwitt> any questions about PTG, retrospective, rocky specs?
21:20:46 <melwitt> #topic Stable branch status
21:20:52 <melwitt> #link stable/queens: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/queens,n,z
21:20:59 <melwitt> #link stable/pike: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/pike,n,z
21:21:04 <melwitt> #link Pike 16.1.0 release proposed: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/544020/
21:21:10 <melwitt> #link stable/ocata: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/ocata,n,z
21:21:31 <mriedem> we flushed pike earlier in the week,
21:21:35 <mriedem> likely need to hit up ocata tomorrow
21:21:51 <melwitt> okay, cool
21:21:53 <mriedem> i will bug lee, sylvain and dan appropriately
21:22:18 <melwitt> cool, thanks
21:22:31 <melwitt> #topic Subteam Highlights
21:22:42 <melwitt> dansmith: cells v2?
21:22:50 <dansmith> nobody showed up for it this week, so we didn't have one
21:23:16 <melwitt> edleafe: scheduler?
21:23:21 <edleafe> The meeting wasn't too brief, but we only seemed to cover a few things.
21:23:24 <edleafe> We discussed the patch for supporting traits in Glance images.
21:23:24 <edleafe> that's about it
21:23:27 <edleafe> efried tried to discuss his NUMA spec, but for some reason the Glance traits thing kept popping back up.
21:23:30 <edleafe> We also had a quick discussion of the healthcheck spec.
21:23:32 <edleafe> Since then it's been spec after spec after spec to review.
21:23:55 <melwitt> nice
21:24:14 <melwitt> okay, and I see for the notification subteam, gibi has left a note that there was no meeting this week
21:24:24 <melwitt> #topic Stuck Reviews
21:24:43 <melwitt> there aren't any items in the agenda. does anyone have any stuck reviews to discuss?
21:25:04 <melwitt> #topic Open discussion
21:25:19 <melwitt> again, no items in the agenda. does anyone have anything to discuss openly?
21:26:02 <melwitt> okay, that sounds like a no
21:26:10 <melwitt> alright, I guess that's it. thanks everyone!
21:26:17 <edleafe> thanks melwitt!
21:26:20 <melwitt> #endmeeting