14:00:07 #startmeeting nova 14:00:09 Meeting started Thu Jan 10 14:00:07 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:13 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 14:00:15 o/ 14:00:19 \o 14:00:22 * kashyap waves 14:00:36 hello everyone 14:00:52 Hi all 14:00:53 o/ 14:01:35 lets get started 14:01:37 #topic Release News 14:01:51 #link Stein release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Stein_Release_Schedule 14:01:52 o/ 14:01:59 #link Stein blueprints close to approval for spec freeze today Jan 10: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-stein-blueprint-spec-freeze 14:02:52 as far as I see only two item on that etherpad that is close 14:02:57 gibi: Hi 14:03:15 I didn't add mine there on line-53 14:03:34 also if we could address line 49 14:03:40 kashyap: noted, I think your TLS item is also close 14:03:48 Yeah, let me move it to that section 14:04:23 adrianc: which one do you refer? 14:04:37 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-neutron-sriov-livemigration 14:05:25 adrianc: there the spec still needs review as far as I see 14:05:38 adrianc: and the spec freeze is today 14:05:48 Yeah, that's a tricky one. The only spec core we have that knows anything about PCI is jaypipes :( 14:06:20 at least, iirc 14:06:37 anyhow there is still a day. :) 14:06:52 moving forward 14:06:58 #link Stein runway etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-runways-stein 14:07:05 #link runway #1: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/local-disk-serial-numbers (mdbooth) [END 2019-01-10] (extra week because of holiday week) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530786 14:07:10 #link runway #2: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/conf-max-attach-volumes (melwitt) [END 2019-01-18] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/conf-max-attach-volumes+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 14:07:14 #link runway #3: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/run-meta-api-per-cell - Allow run metadata api per cell (Kevin_Zheng) [END 2019-01-18] https://review.openstack.org/624612/ 14:07:51 from the conf-max-attach-volumes only the last patch left 14:08:34 and the metadata api one has -1 from mriedem 14:09:06 I did not review the disk serial number series 14:09:17 any other things about the release? 14:10:23 #topic Bugs 14:10:34 no critical bugs 14:10:45 #link 63 new untriaged bugs (up 2 since the last meeting): https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 14:10:50 #link 14 untagged untriaged bugs (up 3 since the last meeting): https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=-*&field.status%3Alist=NEW 14:10:55 #link bug triage how-to: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Tags 14:10:59 #help need help with bug triage 14:11:21 anything else about bugs? 14:11:50 Gate status 14:11:52 Yeah, bug triage is always one of the important unthanful tasks that need to be keept going... 14:12:02 kashyap: agreed :) 14:12:05 #link check queue gate status http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html 14:12:26 * efried waves late 14:12:40 honestly I don't push any patch since my vacation so I don't know the state of the gate 14:13:28 there are couple of failures in the elastic-recheck page related to nova 14:13:44 non of seems blocking 14:13:55 3rd party CI 14:13:58 #link 3rd party CI status http://ciwatch.mmedvede.net/project?project=nova&time=7+days 14:14:23 anything else about the gate or CI? 14:14:40 I guess if there's anything burning you'll see it on the list for sure :-) 14:15:16 #topic Reminders 14:15:20 #link Stein Subteam Patches n Bugs: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stein-nova-subteam-tracking 14:15:24 #link Spec freeze/non-priority blueprint freeze is s-2 January 10, 2019 14:15:30 which is today 14:15:49 bps that are close tracked in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-stein-blueprint-spec-freeze 14:15:52 gibi: So one quick note on that TLS blueprint 14:15:53 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-stein-blueprint-spec-freeze 14:16:02 kashyap: go 14:16:10 Here's the almost close blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-qemu-native-tls-for-live-migration: 14:16:19 And the "almost ready" rendering of the doc patch is here: 14:16:19 http://logs.openstack.org/27/629627/2/check/openstack-tox-docs/dc52e37/html/admin/secure-live-migration-with-qemu-native-tls.html#performing-the-migration 14:16:39 gibi: I'm addressing the last bits of feedback from stephenfin, as we speak; then it should be ready. 14:16:55 kashyap: as far as I know we need a nod from Dan on the doc before we can approve the bp 14:17:03 gibi: I wonder when should I expect the blueprint to be ACKed? 14:17:23 gibi: Yeah, Dan reviewed it as well. I've addressed the nits he pointed out 14:17:30 kashyap: I think as soon as dansmith wakes up and checks your doc patch again 14:17:33 (That's the change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/629627/) 14:17:36 Yeap 14:17:41 kashyap: feel free to ping dansmith and melwitt about it 14:17:49 kashyap: from my perspective that bp is good to go 14:18:03 I'll badger them when they had sufficient coffee molecules in their blood stream. 14:18:08 s/when/once/ 14:18:13 kashyap: good plan 14:18:20 gibi: Alright; that's it onthat 14:18:24 kashyap: thanks 14:18:30 s/onthat/on that/; besides a final +W from the reviewer 14:18:31 anything else still on the spec freeze? 14:19:10 #topci Stable branch status 14:19:22 #topic Stable branch status 14:19:27 #link stable/rocky: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/rocky,n,z 14:19:31 #link stable/queens: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/queens,n,z 14:19:35 #link stable/pike: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/pike,n,z 14:20:01 does somebody has news from the stable side? I know that mriedem will be back next week 14:20:54 (mriedem, the source of all stability) 14:21:01 if not, then we wait for Matt 14:21:07 #topic Subteam Highlights 14:21:15 Scheduler (efried) 14:21:24 or cdent 14:21:28 efried was not around, so I ran the meeting, 14:21:54 most people were not up to date on the latest pupdate, so we just said "read that", made everyone chair, and ended the meeting 14:22:08 cdent: thanks 14:22:14 API (gmann) 14:22:34 I'd say the most important thing to highlight is that next week there will be a meeting to list the remaining requiremens to be happy with placement extraction. not scheduled yet. 14:22:46 cdent: good point 14:23:07 cdent: will it be a video call? 14:23:26 I suspect it will be hangout, yes, but that was made explicit 14:23:27 cdent: or just irc meeting 14:23:29 wasn't! 14:23:47 darn contractions! 14:23:54 cdent: :) 14:23:57 ruin me every time 14:24:16 cdent: anything else you want to highlight? 14:24:21 no, thanks 14:24:25 cdent: thanks 14:24:25 API (gmann) 14:24:58 it seems gmann is not around 14:25:07 any other subteam hightlight? 14:25:45 #topic Stuck Reviews 14:25:49 noting on the agenda 14:26:05 I have one thing 14:26:30 the #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/bandwidth-resource-provider is stuck 14:26:43 and we will try to unstuck it next week on a hangouts call 14:27:04 details are on the ML 14:27:27 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-January/001568.html 14:27:36 anybody else has a stuck review? 14:28:37 #topic Open discussion 14:28:50 there are 3 things on the agenda 14:28:54 (kashyap) Blueprint approval: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/support-qemu-native-tls-for-live-migration 14:29:02 I think we already covered this today 14:29:13 so going to the next point 14:29:15 (melwitt): Spec or specless bp for this? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-disable-pmu-for-realtime-guests (sean-k-mooney) 14:29:31 I was thinking this needs a spec because it's proposing the addition of a new flavor extra spec. Thoughts? 14:29:35 This spec/bp is seeking approval before spec freeze at EOD. 14:29:42 gibi: Yeah, we did. 14:29:52 // end of message from melwitt 14:30:35 this pmu bp is new to me 14:30:53 gibi: i can write a quick spec if required 14:31:02 but wonderign if its too late or not 14:31:34 sean-k-mooney: yeah I think melwitt would like to see a spec which would most probably means that it slips spec freeze 14:31:36 i can work on it in train if so 14:32:36 I guess there are not enough core in the room now to decied 14:32:38 decide 14:33:00 sean-k-mooney: try to ask on #openstack-nova when the rest of the gang are up 14:33:07 that ok it was a feature i was pulling in form next cycle anyway 14:34:18 sean-k-mooney: OK 14:34:31 next item 14:34:32 (melwitt): Specless bp approval wanted for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/fix-reschedule-up-calls 14:34:40 I just want to be on record saying thanks to everyone re 14:34:56 (argh, pressed enter too early. 14:36:01 so bp fix-reschedule-up-calls actually fixing two nontrivial bugs 14:36:27 so I'm not against approving that bp 14:36:39 any other opinions? 14:37:03 narp 14:37:49 OK, I will note this on the bp and ping melwitt to approve it if she agrees too 14:38:08 that was all from the agenda 14:38:17 jangutter: do you want to go on record? 14:38:30 I just want to be on record saying thanks to everyone reviewing all the garbage I wrote.... 14:39:01 jangutter: I'm pretty sure it is not garbage. Thank you for contributing 14:40:37 anything else to discuss today? 14:41:40 then thank you everyone! 14:41:58 #endmeeting