16:00:16 <dansmith> #startmeeting nova
16:00:17 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Jul 30 16:00:16 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dansmith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:18 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:21 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:25 <bauzas> \o
16:00:28 <dansmith> who is up for a super short meeting?
16:00:36 <stephenfin> \o/
16:01:04 <lyarwood> \o
16:01:15 <artom> ~o~
16:01:18 <dansmith> #topic Last meeting
16:01:18 <dansmith> #link Minutes from last meeting: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-07-23-16.00.log.html
16:01:18 <elod> o/
16:01:33 <dansmith> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:01:33 <dansmith> No Critical bugs
16:01:33 <dansmith> #link 36 new untriaged bugs (+4 since the last meeting): https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New
16:01:33 <dansmith> please look at the untriaged bug list and try to push some bugs forward
16:01:47 <dansmith> anything else on bugs?
16:02:13 <dansmith> okay then
16:02:16 <dansmith> #topic Runways
16:02:16 <dansmith> etherpad #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-runways-victoria
16:02:16 <dansmith> besides bp/add-emulated-virtual-tpm in a slot the other two slots are empty at the moment
16:02:36 <dansmith> the tpm thing has been on the list for a long time I think, but I guess there's nothing else pending to kick it out?
16:03:29 <lyarwood> yup, it is making progress slowly, it's just a long series.
16:03:41 <dansmith> ack, nothing else on runways I guess?
16:04:00 <stephenfin> we could definitely transfer gmann's policy series
16:04:04 <stephenfin> into a runway
16:04:27 <dansmith> is that on the queue?
16:04:32 <gmann> those has +2 from stephenfin, will be quick to merge
16:04:34 <stephenfin> yup, second one
16:04:36 <gmann> yeah,
16:04:44 <dansmith> oh heh duh
16:04:48 <dansmith> stephenfin: do it
16:04:52 <stephenfin> cool
16:05:06 <dansmith> the cyborg shelve thing has seen some movement right, is there some reason it's not in a slot?
16:05:41 <stephenfin> if it's ready for review and has people willing to review, it can go into a slot I think
16:05:43 <stephenfin> ?
16:06:15 <dansmith> that's what I'm asking
16:06:31 <dansmith> maybe we can ping brin after the meeting and make sure
16:06:44 <stephenfin> nope, in merge conflict
16:06:49 <stephenfin> (https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729563/)
16:06:52 <stephenfin> so that's not ready for a runway
16:07:11 <dansmith> ack, but that might be recent, I think he just updated it today or yesterday, if I'm remembering
16:07:22 <stephenfin> fair
16:07:25 <dansmith> er,
16:07:30 <dansmith> maybe that's evac which is underneath
16:07:33 <stephenfin> definitely worth asking afterwards so
16:07:36 <dansmith> anyway, yeah, I guess we hold and ask
16:07:39 <dansmith> moving on
16:07:49 <dansmith> #topic Stable Branches
16:07:55 <dansmith> lyarwood: how bad is it? :)
16:08:32 <lyarwood> actually pretty stable for a change :)
16:08:37 <dansmith> woot
16:08:40 <lyarwood> 19.3.0 was cut last week
16:08:44 <lyarwood> that's pretty much it news wise
16:09:03 <dansmith> no gnus is good news
16:09:10 <dansmith> (emacs joke for anyone that gets it)
16:09:21 <dansmith> #topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:09:25 <dansmith> gmann: API
16:09:50 <gmann> nothing else than policy work which is in runway now and need second +2
16:09:57 <dansmith> I have been keeping gmann busy with other stuff
16:10:29 <dansmith> bauzas: libvirt?
16:10:45 <bauzas> dansmith: nothing to say
16:10:51 <dansmith> sweet
16:10:54 <lyarwood> quick one
16:10:56 <lyarwood> #sorry
16:10:58 <lyarwood> on libvirt
16:11:08 <lyarwood> we have all of the six removal changes queued up
16:11:16 <lyarwood> did we agree on landing this in V in the end?
16:11:41 <lyarwood> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bp/six-removal+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
16:11:51 <bauzas> honestly
16:11:59 <bauzas> nothing really urgent, right?
16:12:16 <dansmith> I don't remember if we agreed on anything, but I remember being not in favor of it ;)
16:12:16 <lyarwood> *rolls eyes*
16:12:26 <lyarwood> cool, just asking
16:12:29 <dansmith> this isn't really libvirt-related right? the patches touch everything (EVERYthing)
16:12:35 <bauzas> anyway, people can review if they want
16:12:37 <lyarwood> it's mostly libvirt that's left iirc
16:12:50 <lyarwood> I just didn't want to merge things if people were still really against this
16:12:51 <dansmith> this for example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/728109/
16:12:52 <stephenfin> We said we wouldn't outright reject it, but it was on Takashi and I to find someone else that cared enough to review it
16:12:54 <dansmith> mostly touches non-libvirt
16:13:09 <bauzas> sure, I'd say ping me if you want me to review those
16:13:11 <bauzas> but,
16:13:21 <bauzas> I'll be off starting tonight for the next 3 weeks
16:13:28 <lyarwood> was I asking that?
16:13:34 <lyarwood> anyway lets move on
16:14:04 <dansmith> #topic Stuck Reviews
16:14:24 <dansmith> nothing on the list
16:14:49 <dansmith> anything? bueller?
16:15:15 <dansmith> #topic Open discussion
16:15:34 <dansmith> nothing on the list here either... anyone have anything?
16:15:55 <stephenfin> nothing from me, anyway
16:16:13 <lyarwood> nope
16:16:26 <dansmith> stephenfin: I saw a mention about the ceph job failing again recently, but when I looked it was just the same cinder test that seems to be failing all over
16:16:31 <dansmith> did anything transpire there?
16:16:59 <stephenfin> dansmith: I've been stuck on downstream stuff so I haven't paid much attention since, unfortunately
16:17:11 <dansmith> okay, just wanted to make sure it's not bleeding all over people
16:17:14 <stephenfin> If I spot more next week, though you'll be the first person told x
16:17:20 <dansmith> my changes from the base ceph job, by the way,
16:17:41 <dansmith> will generally only manifest as a total failure to boot instances
16:17:47 <dansmith> it really only affects the first instance boot nova does after devstack runs
16:17:57 <dansmith> and after that, nothing else should be different from the base ceph job we had
16:18:00 <lyarwood> dansmith: iirc that failure was only in Glance, removal of an image after a test
16:18:14 <lyarwood> dansmith: and the test was Glance only
16:18:28 <lyarwood> dansmith: spinning up the image and doing something to it, I forget the details
16:18:37 <dansmith> lyarwood: okay the run I looked at (which might've been different) was a cinder volume operation that I've seen fail in multiple places
16:18:39 <lyarwood> dansmith: but ceph couldn't find the /snap snapshot
16:18:45 <dansmith> ah okay
16:18:51 <lyarwood> kk
16:18:53 <dansmith> well, that's definitely not related to my changes to the job then
16:18:57 <lyarwood> I'll also keep an eye out for any failures
16:19:25 <dansmith> cool, the job looks a lot more complicated now, but it's not really operationally past the first boot so I thought I'd point that out
16:19:34 <dansmith> okay, anything else for open discussion?
16:19:58 <dansmith> going thrice....
16:20:34 <dansmith> #endmeeting