16:00:15 #startmeeting nova 16:00:16 Meeting started Thu Nov 5 16:00:15 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:20 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 16:00:26 o/ 16:01:01 o/ 16:01:16 o/ 16:01:30 \o 16:01:48 #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) 16:01:55 we have on critical bug 16:01:59 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1902925 16:02:00 Launchpad bug 1902925 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Upgrades to compute RPC API 5.12 are broken" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Sylvain Bauza (sylvain-bauza) 16:02:04 fix is up # link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/761458/ 16:02:08 I just +Wd 16:02:15 really nice catch by bauzas 16:02:20 we will need a victoria point release once the fix merged to stable/victoria 16:02:47 will be providing the stable changes once it's merged 16:03:04 as we discussed on #openstack-nova we need to be more careful about reviewing RPC changes in the future 16:03:37 anything else about this bug? 16:04:03 nope, let's discuss if people wish on how we could avoid it in the future 16:04:20 at least by requiring functional tests that would set the rpc pins 16:04:33 but moving on for now 16:04:34 I 16:04:39 OK 16:04:46 #link 10 new untriaged bugs (+3 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 16:05:04 this number is slowly growing 16:05:12 I blame the summit and PTG weeks 16:05:14 :) 16:05:43 as we discussed on the PTG I addedd extra bug queriest to the agenda 16:05:49 #link 19 bugs in fix-commited state (+0 since last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.searchtext=&search=Search&field.status%3Alist=FIXCOMMITTED 16:06:06 these bugs seems to be in invalid state, they should be in fix-released state 16:06:07 there is an obvious fix here, 16:06:14 disable the bug tracker during PTG and summit weeks. 16:06:23 dansmith: seconded :D 16:06:35 :P 16:06:57 I will go through this 19 bugs and move them to fix-released 16:07:15 another query 16:07:16 #link 72 bugs are in INPROGRESS state without any tag: #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=-*&field.status%3Alist=INPROGRESS 16:07:30 these are potentially untriaged bugs 16:07:37 yup 16:07:43 certainly they are 16:07:45 we could check them to see if they are valid 16:07:51 I can take it 16:07:56 bauzas: thanks! 16:08:38 if you have other bug query idea just plug it on the agenda and I will start to follow it when I update the agenda for the next meeting 16:09:23 any other bug to talk abou? 16:10:41 then a new permanent agenda topic based on the PTG 16:10:42 #topic Gate status 16:10:56 15 (+0 since the last meeting) unclassified gate failures, classification rate 46% (+0 since the last meeting) #link http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/data/integrated_gate.html 16:11:13 Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967) 16:11:36 I have one failure I want to highlight here 16:11:59 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1902696 16:12:00 Launchpad bug 1902696 in oslo.messaging "nova-compute fails with Unhandled error: TypeError: _wrap_socket_sni() got an unexpected keyword argument 'ca_certs'" [Undecided,New] 16:12:11 it is visible in kolla jobs 16:12:30 as I guess our jobs are not using ssl for RPC 16:13:08 there is a workaround requirement pin patch #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/761194/ 16:14:01 melwitt: reported another gate failure on the ML http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-November/018543.html 16:14:25 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/1902002 16:14:27 Launchpad bug 1902002 in devstack "Fail to get default route device in CI jobs" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Nate Johnston (nate-johnston) 16:14:41 fix has been proposed here #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/761178/ 16:15:11 any other gate issue we should aware of? 16:17:44 then moving on 16:17:53 #topic Release Planning 16:17:59 Wallaby Milestone 1 is on 3rd of December, which is 4 weeks from now 16:18:12 We should focus on updating / reviewing spec based on the PTG discussions 16:19:09 any other release specific topic to discuss? 16:19:14 and maybe do a specs review day ? 16:19:29 like in 2 weeks from now ? 16:19:52 good ida 16:19:53 we would be half term from FF, a reasonable amount of time left for implementing 16:19:54 idea 16:20:39 #action gibi to propose an spec review day for somewhere in the week starting at 16th of Nov 16:21:40 #topic Stable Branches 16:21:54 elod left some info on the agenda 16:22:11 the number of patches in stable branches, that are waiting for review, is growing 16:22:25 final release for Stein before the transition to Extended Maintenance -- https://review.opendev.org/#/c/761614/ 16:22:37 also it's a good time to release on newer branches -- https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/releases+is:open+intopic:nova 16:22:42 ack, on my tasks then 16:22:42 (in case of victoria release, wait for bugfix of bug/1902925 to land first) 16:22:52 EOM 16:23:34 I will look at the Stein release patch tomorrow 16:23:35 so, stein EM transition deadline is next Wednesday 16:24:13 if anyone see any patch that would be good to land in Stein before the final release happens, this is the last occasion :) 16:24:51 otherwise i think we are good 16:25:35 the moving forward 16:25:37 #topic Sub/related team Highlights 16:25:44 API (gmann) 16:27:49 Libvirt (bauzas) 16:27:57 hmmmm 16:28:06 haven't prepared it 16:28:24 well, afair, nothing to report 16:28:31 s/o else wants to raise ? 16:30:58 moving on then 16:30:59 #topic Open discussion 16:31:07 I have two items here 16:31:14 (gibi): we said on the PTG that the cyborg bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cyborg-shelve-and-unshelve is OK but we thought at that time that this is spec re-propose. It is actually a specless bp that we approved for Victoria. Are we OK to approve it to Wallaby? 16:31:31 ready to review implementation patch: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729563/ 16:32:57 this time, the RPC changes look good :p 16:33:11 and sure we will ask for a func test :) 16:33:42 well, if we said specless for evacuate, I can't see how we could say "spec!" for shelve 16:34:30 yeah. I wanted to bring it up to clarify the missunderstanding from the PTG 16:34:42 except the RPC changes, I don't see any DB changes ? 16:34:42 so if no objection then I will approve it for wallaby 16:34:55 bauzas: no db change as far as I understand 16:34:55 and the API is just removing a 40x ? 16:35:11 hence no microversion asked ? 16:35:46 if so, we have our answer 16:36:25 no new microversion 16:36:33 and I don't here any objection 16:36:39 so I will approve it after the meeting 16:36:57 we're returning an extra 403 instead of a 409, but that's OK to me 16:37:08 so yeah, no microversion hence no spec 16:37:36 OK 16:37:42 the next one is a bit similar 16:37:43 (gibi) there is another specless bp from cyborg https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/cyborg-suspend-and-resume this is a new one. Are we OK to approve the bp to Wallaby? 16:37:54 WIP patch: #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/729945/ 16:38:31 it has basically the same impacts as the previous one 16:38:43 RPC bump, no API microversion 16:39:34 the manager side RPC handlers have a new, optional, param 16:40:27 if no objection then I will approve this as well as a specless bp for W 16:41:01 * bauzas rolls eyes :) 16:41:21 I don't see any objections 16:41:28 so I will do the paperwork after the meeting 16:41:35 any other topic for today? 16:42:24 then thanks for joining today 16:43:03 #endmeeting