16:00:12 <gibi> #startmeeting nova 16:00:13 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Mar 4 16:00:12 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:14 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:16 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 16:00:38 <dansmith> o/ 16:00:51 <claudiub> o/ 16:01:02 <gibi> o/ 16:01:45 <elod> o/ 16:01:47 <gibi> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) 16:01:55 <gibi> no critical bugs 16:02:01 <gibi> #link 13 new untriaged bugs (-1 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 16:02:19 <gibi> is there any specific bug we need to discuss today? 16:03:52 <gibi> #topic Gate status 16:03:57 <gibi> gate feels OK 16:04:06 <dansmith> lots of cinder fails, 16:04:20 <gibi> dansmith: is there anything we can help with those? 16:04:20 <dansmith> but we got some new quota recently apparently, so even though load is very high, we're doing a lot 16:04:37 <dansmith> gibi: I've offered, but we need some cinder people to look. I think we've got some attention on that now 16:04:51 <dansmith> meaning, I've offered to help and shared my notes 16:05:00 <gibi> thanks 16:05:31 <gibi> any nova specific failure we should look into? 16:05:38 <dansmith> not that I've seen 16:07:17 <gibi> #topic feature status 16:07:26 <gibi> I have a long list of status 16:07:33 <gibi> I will copy now 16:07:46 <gibi> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hyperv-rbd : merged \o/ along with the necessary os-brick lower constraint bump 16:07:51 <gibi> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-support-webvnc-with-password-anthentication : discussion about interference with TLS is still ongoing 16:07:58 <gibi> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/compact-db-migrations-wallaby : Ocata and Pike nova_api db compaction is on the gate 16:08:03 <gibi> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/modernize-os-hypervisors-api : the python-novaclient patch landed, the policy patch is still open 16:08:09 <gibi> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-default-machine-type : stephenfin needs to re-add his +2 but the series are approved 16:08:15 <gibi> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/allow-disabling-cpu-flags : we have agreement about the config option and only a second +2 is needed 16:08:20 <gibi> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/smarter-usb-devices : the last patch conflicts with the secure boot series 16:08:24 <gibi> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/pci-socket-affinity : the last two patches has negative reviews 16:08:28 <gibi> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/allow-secure-boot-for-qemu-kvm-guests : has negative reviews 16:08:31 <gibi> EOM 16:09:50 <gibi> is there any feature that is close to land but locked on a decision? 16:10:00 <gibi> s/locked/blocked/ 16:11:17 * lyarwood joins late 16:11:30 <gibi> moving on 16:11:32 <gibi> #topic Release Planning 16:11:36 <gibi> Feature Freeze is at 11th of March, in 1 weeks from now 16:11:54 <gibi> We finished 5 and deferred 1 blueprints out of the 20 approved bp so far. 16:12:15 <gibi> I'm sure we will not close all the remaning 14 bps 16:12:34 <gibi> I sent a mail about the release planning to the ML 16:12:45 <gibi> as well as created a release tracking etherpad 16:12:50 <gibi> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-wallaby-rc-potential 16:13:53 <gibi> FFE rules are posted here #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-March/020772.html 16:14:35 <gibi> is there any question regarding the incoming FF and release? 16:15:46 <gibi> OK so it is clear then :) 16:15:51 * bauzas says whoops for having forgotten the meeting 16:15:55 <gibi> btw PTL and TC nomination periods are open until 9th of March: #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/ Feel free to do self nomination 16:16:17 <bauzas> not thinking about X but Y ;) 16:16:56 <gibi> :) 16:17:12 <gibi> #topic PTG planning 16:17:17 <gibi> PTG date had been announced: April 19-23, 2021 16:17:22 <gibi> Use the PTG etherpad to collect topics: #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-xena-ptg 16:17:27 <gibi> I will create a poll to agree on the timing of the sessions 16:17:42 <bauzas> sean already wrote a long list of good discussions :p 16:18:16 <gibi> thanks for that 16:18:36 <gibi> #topic Stable Branches 16:18:45 <gibi> no outstanding issue with stable branches 16:18:51 <gibi> stable releases planned for Victoria, Ussuri, Train @ next week (after Feature Freeze?) 16:18:54 <gibi> EOM 16:19:42 <bauzas> do we need to look at some stable changes before ? 16:19:52 <bauzas> is there any urgent query for those ? 16:20:26 <elod> well, there are open patches, but I'm not aware of any urgent one 16:20:35 <gibi> me neither 16:20:38 <lyarwood> there's nothing urgent but I've got loads outstanding 16:20:49 <bauzas> ok, I can try to look at some 16:20:51 <lyarwood> I'll try to write up a list of things I'd like to ship in the same releases next week 16:21:15 <gibi> thanks 16:21:42 <elod> lyarwood: I'll try to review your list then next week :) 16:21:52 <elod> i mean the patches :) 16:21:57 <lyarwood> ack thanks 16:22:21 <gibi> #topic Sub/related team Highlights 16:22:26 <gibi> Libvirt (bauzas) 16:22:54 <bauzas> nothing to report, sir. 16:23:25 <gibi> thanks 16:23:28 <gibi> #topic Open discussion 16:23:32 <gibi> nothing on the agenda 16:23:39 <claudiub> I have a NUMA related question, if I may. 16:23:42 <gibi> claudiub: go 16:24:14 <claudiub> So, here https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/admin/cpu-topologies.html#customizing-instance-numa-placement-policies mentions that the NUMA nodes used for the instances are normally chosen at random 16:24:56 <claudiub> numa_fit_instance_to_host documentation mentions that it returns a new InstanceNUMATopology with its cell ids set to host cell ids of the first successful permutation or None 16:25:19 <claudiub> so, there's a mismatch there. I'm wondering which is correct. 16:25:45 <claudiub> From what I've seen, the compute nodes seem to be crammed on the NUMA node 0 with all the instances being scheduled there. 16:26:27 <claudiub> that could be problematic. Basically, I can have nodes with 50% consumed resources, but 1 NUMA node completely empty. 16:27:18 <claudiub> I've submitted a commit here too, which looks into this issue: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/778740 16:27:43 <gibi> claudiub: I also think that we fill numa nodes sequentially 16:28:47 <gibi> hm, sean-k-mooney is not here today but I think they could answer this question 16:28:55 <gibi> claudiub: I suggest to bring this up on #openstack-nova 16:29:05 <claudiub> Indeed, that is what I've seen as well. But is there insight into why this was chosen? AFAIK, when live-migrating, it'll live-migrate into the same NUMA node (though I may be wrong), so this can be problematic. 16:29:57 <claudiub> will ask this in #openstack-nova then. :) 16:30:00 <gibi> thanks 16:30:15 <gibi> any other topic for today? 16:32:11 <gibi> if nothing then thanks for joining today! 16:32:17 <gibi> \o 16:32:20 <gibi> #endmeeting