16:00:03 #startmeeting nova 16:00:03 Meeting started Tue Jun 15 16:00:03 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:03 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 16:00:13 o/ 16:00:15 o/ 16:00:30 welcome in our new meeting venue 16:00:51 o/ it feels familar for some reason i woneder why :) 16:01:00 could do with a lick of paint but otherwise not bad 16:01:24 you should appreciate that you did not need to move rooms :) 16:01:50 no uncessary walking around 16:01:51 o/ 16:01:54 meetingshed paint debate time 16:02:05 :) 16:02:19 * gibi bad at colors 16:02:24 anyhow lets get started 16:02:25 Because it's colours ;) 16:02:41 o/ 16:02:42 ;) 16:02:46 openstack server create --flavour 16:03:01 :) that used to be in the docs 16:03:11 i think most people are hear now 16:03:25 nyitottverem gep elterhozas --iz 16:03:28 ;) 16:03:36 if we are at linguistics 16:03:44 gibi's having a stroke 16:03:49 o/ 16:03:51 s/eletrhozas/letrehozas/ 16:03:55 The old channel was better, I could understand what people were saying :( 16:04:02 (Some of the time) 16:04:09 #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) 16:04:15 no critical onse 16:04:18 ones 16:04:25 #link 14 new untriaged bugs (+3 since the last meeting): #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 16:04:44 besides gate bugs (coming in the next topic) is there any bug we need to talk about? 16:06:23 #topic Gate status 16:06:27 Nova gate bugs #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure 16:07:03 we fixed the mypy blockage but the gate is still shaky 16:07:23 we are tracking a list of new bugs that causing intermittent failures 16:08:07 and rechecking fixes 16:08:23 I don't want to go through the whole list of bugs 16:08:28 we have made some progress on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1929446 , otherwiseguy summerised some of the steps forward in https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1929446/comments/3 while https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ovsdbapp/+/795789 seams to fix it we are not going to proceedd with merging it 16:08:52 im going to try and implement the os-vif changes this week 16:09:26 sean-k-mooney: it is the one that suspected to causing timeouts in live migrations? 16:09:34 terry is proceedign with the fix in ovs. 16:09:36 yes 16:09:40 not just live migrations 16:10:06 it i causeing the agent to periodically block for several seconds whenever there is a disconnection form ovs 16:10:21 so its likely makeing the many things flaky 16:11:03 * melwitt majorly looks forward to that fix 16:11:13 sean-k-mooney: thanks 16:11:24 any other bug needs discussion? 16:13:17 Placement periodic jobs looks green 16:13:23 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly 16:13:28 #topic Release Planning 16:13:32 Milestone 2 is 15 of July 16:13:46 anything else about the release? 16:14:38 #topic Stable Branches 16:14:44 stable/ussuri is blocked -- fix needs to be merged: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/794675 16:14:48 other branches should be OK 16:14:52 stable/ocata will be EOL'd -- nova patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/795664 16:14:55 EOM 16:14:59 thanks elodilles for the summary 16:15:09 np 16:15:20 anything else on stable? 16:15:23 gibi: about that first patch, I think it's a bit more complicated, melwitt created a squashed patch with more changes 16:15:29 but it's failing too 16:15:55 yeah elodilles has added a comment wrt the fail 16:16:08 yes, I've just commented on it as it is failing on the post tasks 16:16:22 :] 16:16:36 and yes it's a megasquash. I defer to elodilles as to how the commit message should be bc I don't know :) 16:17:03 this one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/795432/2 (which should probably get a better combined subject) 16:17:35 I missed our reasoning for doing this but as it's mostly my work I'll try to take a look before I leave today 16:17:43 or you can preserve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/794675 as it is, but set nova-live-migration as non-voting, and re-enable it in a subsequent commit 16:18:08 which would reduce the diff and avoid a supermegasquash 16:18:23 lyarwood: thanks 16:18:27 lyarwood: tl;dr is tosky recommended we backport the native zuul v3 patches instead of fixing legacy versions 16:19:05 so I tried to do it. it worked ok until ussuri 16:19:17 ack understood 16:19:37 it's mostly working in fact: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/795432/ shows that the backported change works, but something else fails 16:19:55 so feel free to take another approach if it's too messy 16:20:24 maybe just that post task should be fixed (to avoid the supermegasquash :)) 16:20:40 I mean... if that is possible... 16:20:50 without the supermegasquash 16:21:10 yeah it's possible 16:21:26 \o/ 16:21:27 it's just because this was written against focal but the nodes here are bionic AFAICT 16:21:44 on ussuri? 16:21:45 yes, it's bionic 16:21:46 yeah ussuri is on bionic 16:21:55 really ok i thought that was focal 16:22:04 from victoria we moved to focal 16:22:07 hopefully that wont be hard to fix then 16:22:35 Could not find the requested service libvirtd-ro.socket: host 16:22:43 ok so likely hte service names are different 16:22:59 both that should be a quick fix 16:23:14 OK I think we generated ideas about the way forwards 16:23:23 anything else about stable? 16:23:38 nothing from me 16:24:29 OK moving on 16:24:44 skipping the libvirt subteam topic as bauzas is absent, but he said nothing to report 16:24:50 #topic Open discussion 16:24:57 there is one item on the agenda 16:25:04 (yonglihe)smartnic support need one extra core reviewer , we have alex now, anyone else could help? thanks : https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/779913 (yongli could not attending due to time slot...) 16:25:58 looking at the patches I think alex_xu haven't reviewed them 16:26:18 or at least not recently 16:26:50 as I reviewed these in the past I can be the second core 16:27:05 but I will wait for Alex to to the first rounds 16:27:50 any comment? 16:28:38 i can proably take another look at that although i kind of wanted 16:28:48 someone else who can review the code to be on board with it 16:28:58 oh that the implemtion not the spec 16:29:06 yep the spec is approved 16:30:24 well i can try and review the code i guess but maybe stephenfin or bauzas could take a look? 16:30:59 I can give it a shot 16:31:18 OK thanks I think this is more than enough :) 16:31:25 any other topic for today? 16:32:23 oh, one 16:32:27 specless BP approval 16:32:31 for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-sqlalchemy-migrate 16:32:40 I thought I had done this before, but clearly not 16:32:53 that's the spec to track replacing sqlalchemy-migrate with alembic 16:33:18 you mean blueprint 16:33:22 or is there actully a spec 16:33:52 sorry, blueprint, yeah 16:33:57 i assume you want to track it as a specless blueprint 16:34:00 ok 16:34:23 Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: zuul: Start to migrate nova-live-migration to zuulv3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/795432 16:34:49 stephenfin: do you forsee any complication that might warrant a spec? 16:35:09 not at the moment, no. It's very simple if tedious so far 16:35:28 in the ptg we said """create a contributor doc showing how a migration will look like after the change. Document how to backport a migration to stable""" and """figure out if alembic collapsing migrations can this cause timeouts for big migrations""" 16:35:34 if I encounter something that I think warrants discussion, I'll happily write one then 16:35:44 did we we figure out the latter 16:36:06 I haven't managed to rewrite all the migrations yet, so no 16:36:19 i think that was the only concern we had e.g. how does it scale 16:36:25 ok 16:36:43 Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: gate: Remove test_evacuate.sh https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/796523 16:36:46 though neutron's use of this suggests we'll be fine (famous last words :)) 16:36:47 i suspect as well as what we currently use or at least well enough for neutron 16:36:53 yup 16:37:18 i dont really have any open quetsion that woudl warrent a spec 16:37:31 provided you provide the contib doc as part of the series 16:38:12 any objection against approving it as specless bp? 16:39:12 then it is approved 16:39:19 any other topic for today? 16:39:27 hurrah 16:39:29 not from me 16:40:15 am one 16:40:19 any feedback on having the meeting on this channel? 16:40:29 gibi: when did you want to do the next spec review day 16:40:38 ++ on meeting in channel :) 16:40:39 gibi: and i think it worked ok 16:40:51 ++ 16:40:57 sean-k-mooney: 6th of July maybe? 16:41:24 meeting in the channel seems sensible so far, yup 16:41:26 ya that gives a few days befor m2 on the 12th 16:41:27 that is a bit more than a week before the freeze 16:41:29 so works for me 16:41:36 as does that date 16:42:05 oh m2 is the 15th 16:42:07 ya 16:42:25 ok that was all i wanted to ask 16:42:38 if nothing else then thanks for joining. 16:42:53 I give the channel back :) 16:42:57 #endmeeting