16:01:09 <bauzas> #startmeeting nova
16:01:09 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Nov  9 16:01:09 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:01:09 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:01:09 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:01:51 <gibi> o/
16:02:13 <bauzas> I'll pass the baton to gibi for a few mins
16:02:21 <bauzas> #chair gibi
16:02:21 <opendevmeet> Current chairs: bauzas gibi
16:02:34 <elodilles> o/
16:03:14 <bauzas> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:03:24 <gibi> bauzas: if everybody for RH is on the meeting where you will present then we might not need this meeting :)
16:03:42 * bauzas facepalms
16:03:45 <bauzas> I dunno
16:03:56 <artom> It's mostly a listening meeting, so we can lurk in both
16:04:04 <gibi> ahh I see
16:04:06 <artom> But yeah, active participation will be... patchy
16:04:24 <bauzas> let's start and we'll see
16:04:28 <gibi> ok
16:04:36 <bauzas> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:04:43 <bauzas> #info No Critical bug
16:04:49 <bauzas> thanks gibi for triaging the one
16:05:05 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 25 new untriaged bugs (+3 since the last meeting)
16:05:16 <bauzas> #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage
16:05:26 <bauzas> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 32 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:05:41 <bauzas> anything to discuss about bugs ?
16:06:35 <bauzas> ok, let's move on to the gate status
16:06:36 <bauzas> #topic Gate status
16:06:44 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:07:01 <gibi> we had an intermittent failure this morning on master
16:07:13 <gibi> but it is resolved now
16:07:22 <bauzas> yeah
16:07:32 <bauzas> we have a few other new bugs
16:07:36 <bauzas> like https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1950310
16:07:52 <bauzas> (easy one to triage, btw.)
16:08:09 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status
16:08:33 <bauzas> we again had an issue with placement-nova-tox-functional-py38
16:08:56 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/build/0c6c18cff1d74f99a6f1a19913f35818 issue with placement-nova-tox-functional-py38 last run
16:09:20 <gibi> that is the misterious
16:09:21 <gibi> /bin/sh: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
16:09:44 <gibi> hm
16:09:55 <bauzas> https://zuul.openstack.org/build/0c6c18cff1d74f99a6f1a19913f35818/log/job-output.txt#802
16:10:03 <gibi> it is again the tox showconfig  role
16:10:05 <bauzas> gibi: I need to pass you the baton now for 5-ish mins
16:10:11 <gibi> ack
16:10:31 <gibi> anyhow I will look into that placement failure I feel we handled this before
16:10:44 <gibi> anything else on the gate status?
16:12:13 <gibi> #topic Release Planning
16:12:17 <gibi> Yoga-1 is due Nova 18th #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-1
16:12:21 <gibi> which means
16:12:25 <gibi> #info Spec review day on Tuesday Nova 16th
16:12:42 <gibi> which is next Tuesday
16:12:57 <gibi> anything else about release planning?
16:14:05 <gibi> #topic Review priorities
16:14:13 <gibi> https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:14:51 <gibi> not a huge list
16:15:18 <gibi> and most of them has feedback already
16:15:34 <gibi> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews
16:15:49 <gibi> I will definitely review that ^^ but probably not today
16:16:13 <gibi> any comment / question about review priorities?
16:16:28 <gmann> I will also check today
16:18:01 * bauzas is back
16:18:28 * gibi hands back the baton
16:18:36 <bauzas> yeah, so I wrote this one
16:19:01 <bauzas> I know we had concerns during the PTG but I'd love to see comments in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861
16:20:08 <bauzas> ok, let's move
16:20:12 <bauzas> #topic Stable Branches
16:20:23 <bauzas> elodilles: your time
16:20:31 <elodilles> victoria and ussuri are blocked until tempest fix lands: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/817179
16:20:48 <elodilles> no news yet regarding the investigation of the 'volume detach' failures that requires many rechecks on multiple stable branches
16:21:17 <elodilles> Ussuri Extended Maintenance transition is scheduled this week (Nov 12)
16:21:30 <elodilles> final release patch proposed: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/817226
16:22:01 <gmann> will check tempest one
16:22:20 <elodilles> still, the list of open and unreleased patches if someone is interested: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-ussuri-em
16:22:27 <bauzas> ++
16:22:32 <elodilles> and patches that need one +2 on ussuri: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+branch:stable/ussuri+is:open+label:Code-Review%253E%253D%252B2
16:22:34 <bauzas> I need to do homework
16:22:38 <elodilles> gmann: thanks in advance!
16:23:10 <bauzas> we have a large list of ussuri changes
16:23:20 <elodilles> let me know if something needs to be fit into the final release and I'll hold the release patch until
16:23:23 <bauzas> but I'll try to review a few of them I think are important
16:23:38 <bauzas> I could ask other company folks if they're interesting
16:23:42 <bauzas> interested*
16:24:08 <bauzas> that said, just saying out loud, my own company isn't getting fully interested in ussuri backports for obvious reasons
16:24:19 <gibi> looking at the list a lot of them are not merged to victoria yet
16:24:38 <gmann> +A on tempest fix
16:24:44 <gibi> gmann: thanks for that
16:24:45 <gibi> !
16:24:45 <elodilles> yes. only some could be reasonably quickly merged
16:24:54 <elodilles> gmann: \o/
16:25:11 <gibi> elodilles: do you have some links for "no news yet regarding the investigation of the 'volume detach' failures that requires many rechecks on multiple stable branches"
16:25:13 <elodilles> and we are close to deadline
16:25:42 <bauzas> yup
16:25:42 <gibi> elodilles: is it related to the recently seen kernel panics on stable/victoria ?
16:25:44 <bauzas> I can look at that tomorrow
16:25:46 <elodilles> gibi: not really, as there were not so much activity on stable nowadays
16:26:04 <elodilles> gibi: but yes, it could be related to the kernel panic issue as well
16:26:40 <gibi> as for that I have a huge packport to see if helps
16:26:47 <bauzas> a packport ? nice
16:26:53 <gibi> backport :D
16:27:01 <elodilles> pun intended :D
16:27:14 <gibi> bauzas: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bug/1882521 if you are interested :D
16:27:28 <bauzas> always interested in eating reviews
16:27:34 <gibi> (and yes it is -1 all over as wee need the tempest fix gman just approved)
16:27:50 <bauzas> yeah
16:27:57 <bauzas> this doesn't help btw.
16:28:36 <bauzas> anyway
16:28:38 <bauzas> moving on ?
16:28:52 <bauzas> #topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:28:59 <bauzas> Libvirt (lyarwood)
16:29:03 <bauzas> I guess he's not there
16:29:13 <bauzas> no worries, we can punt this to next week
16:29:52 <bauzas> #topic Open discussion
16:29:59 <bauzas> Off-path Network Backends spec re-review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/787458 after addressing PTG comments (dmitriis)
16:30:10 <bauzas> dmitriis: around ?
16:30:14 <dmitriis> yep
16:31:41 <dmitriis> One of the asks during the PTG was that the Neutron cores review the Neutron spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-specs/+/788821/
16:31:41 <dmitriis> There is some progress on that, I am waiting for a second +2 (hopefully there will be some more feedback today).
16:31:59 <dmitriis> I updated the spec with some of the points that were discussed during the PTG as well
16:32:11 <bauzas> \o/
16:32:23 <bauzas> so I guess it's our turn ?
16:32:40 <dmitriis> That would be much appreciated :^)
16:32:49 <bauzas> ok, so just a ping for reviews ? :)
16:32:58 <bauzas> nothing you wanna discuss with the team by now ?
16:33:05 <bauzas> some open left question, maybe ?
16:33:13 <dmitriis> yes, just a ping for now
16:33:50 <dmitriis> trying to get some eyes on it early since we are getting closer to the spec freeze and holidays
16:34:42 <bauzas> dmitriis: I guess you saw we plan a spec review day ?
16:34:59 <bauzas> dmitriis: this doesn't mean we won't review your spec *before*
16:35:13 <bauzas> but we would appreciate if you could be around on this particular day
16:35:14 <dmitriis> bauzas: yes, I plan to be around for that and ready to address feedback
16:35:23 <bauzas> dmitriis: excellent, thanks
16:35:50 <bauzas> given the size of the spec, first runs of reviews will be needed before the spec review day
16:36:02 <bauzas> but this helps to know you'll be arouind
16:36:14 <dmitriis> bauzas: it had some rounds of reviews around April/May 2021 already
16:36:31 <dmitriis> but, yes, I think early views would be preferred
16:37:14 <bauzas> :)
16:37:31 <bauzas> ok, I guess we consumed the whole agenda
16:37:37 <dmitriis> there were some external dependencies in Libvirt and OVN that got merged recently (so this is out of the way). During the PTG we agreed that the Neutron spec needs to be reviewed first and that I need to address some additional points
16:37:39 <dmitriis> ack
16:37:50 <bauzas> dmitriis: yup, indeed
16:38:07 <bauzas> dmitriis: but yeah, I get the fact the dependencies are now solved
16:38:10 <bauzas> so it's our turn
16:39:04 <bauzas> anyone wanting to raise anything before we shutdown the meeting ?
16:40:11 <gibi> -
16:40:20 <bauzas> #endmeeting