16:02:13 <bauzas> #startmeeting nova 16:02:14 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Feb 22 16:02:13 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:14 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:02:14 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 16:02:24 <bauzas> hey folks, sorry the delay 16:02:31 <gmann> o/ 16:02:31 * bauzas looks at his coffee 16:02:35 <chateaulav> \o 16:02:42 <bauzas> that's its fault 16:03:00 <bauzas> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting 16:03:10 <elodilles> o/ 16:03:20 <bauzas> let's a quick meeting since we're close to some deadline :) 16:03:24 <bauzas> let's do* 16:03:30 <bauzas> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) 16:03:35 <bauzas> #info No Critical bug 16:03:39 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 27 new untriaged bugs (-15 since the last meeting) 16:03:48 <bauzas> thanks gibi and others for having looked at the bugs 16:03:52 <bauzas> #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage 16:03:57 <bauzas> link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement 16:04:01 <bauzas> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement 16:04:06 <bauzas> voila 16:04:10 <bauzas> any bugs to discuss ? 16:04:48 <bauzas> looks not 16:04:57 <bauzas> again, thanks for the folks who looked at the bugs 16:05:10 <bauzas> #topic Gate status 16:05:14 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs 16:05:17 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status 16:05:21 <bauzas> #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. 16:05:37 <bauzas> so we had a few new gate failures 16:05:55 <bauzas> I saw gibi looking at one 16:06:10 <bauzas> any of them needing to be discussed ? 16:06:22 <gibi> I just did some bug triage and duplicated thing together 16:06:30 <gibi> I did not see a new failure this week 16:06:37 <gibi> * new type of failure 16:07:15 <bauzas> kk 16:07:32 <bauzas> ok, then moving to the next topic 16:07:39 <bauzas> #topic Release Planning 16:07:43 <bauzas> #link https://releases.openstack.org/yoga/schedule.html#y-ff FeatureFreeze in 2 days 16:07:47 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking 16:07:58 <bauzas> so the FeatureFreeze will be on Thursday EOB 16:08:35 <bauzas> tbh, that means that nova-cores won't merge any feature change on Friday 16:08:48 <bauzas> unless we got a gate issue 16:09:08 <bauzas> do people have any concerns ? 16:09:17 <gibi> bauzas: you mean no +A on Friday 16:09:25 <bauzas> gibi: sorry yes 16:09:25 <gibi> except if rebase is needed 16:09:29 <bauzas> correct 16:09:32 <gibi> ack 16:09:34 <gibi> works for me 16:10:15 <gmann> ack 16:10:26 <bauzas> do people want to discuss about any blueprint here ? 16:10:38 <gmann> need more reviews on RBAC series https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fpolicy-defaults-refresh-2 16:10:40 <liorf95> yes please 16:10:44 <gmann> thanks gibi for reviews 16:10:44 <bauzas> yes, I'll do 16:10:48 <gmann> thanks 16:10:51 <liorf95> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath 16:10:57 <bauzas> liorf95: we'll discuss about your bp in the open discussion topic 16:10:58 <sean-k-mooney> liorf95: i think yours is in opendicuss at the end but we coudl bring it up now too 16:11:19 <liorf95> as you want 16:11:35 <bauzas> liorf95: that's in the agenda :) 16:11:39 <bauzas> anyway 16:11:49 <bauzas> secure RBAC, yes I'll review 16:12:04 <bauzas> we merged a few features before 16:12:19 <bauzas> I'll modify Launchpad on Friday 16:12:35 <chateaulav> just reviews for emulation to ensure nothing bltent sticks out 16:13:09 <bauzas> ok 16:14:03 <bauzas> ok, moving on then 16:14:14 <bauzas> #topic Review priorities 16:14:17 <bauzas> #topic Review priorities 16:14:25 <bauzas> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 16:14:36 <bauzas> most of the priorities were merged 16:15:05 <bauzas> nothing to tell here 16:15:10 <bauzas> let's continue to review 16:15:17 <bauzas> #topic Stable Branches 16:15:21 <bauzas> elodilles: your time 16:15:41 <elodilles> info stable/queens gate fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/830327 (needs to backport to pike as well) 16:15:44 <elodilles> #info stable/xena gate should be better as Artom's workaround was merged (test_tagged_attachment) 16:15:47 <elodilles> #info stable/wallaby still needs the libvirt_disable_apic to merge + it seems the test_tagged_attachment issue is also present 16:15:50 <elodilles> oops 16:15:52 <elodilles> sorry 16:16:09 <elodilles> anyway, this is mostly it ^^^ 16:16:50 <elodilles> we might need the workarounds to stable/victoria too 16:17:31 <elodilles> #info stable/queens gate fix proposed: https://review.opendev.org/830327 (needs to backport to pike as well) 16:17:40 <elodilles> (just to have it in the logs) 16:18:02 <bauzas> :) 16:19:44 <bauzas> thanks elodilles 16:19:50 <elodilles> np 16:19:58 <bauzas> #topic Open discussion 16:20:08 <bauzas> liorf95: (lior Friedman) https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath 16:20:14 <bauzas> liorf95: your turn 16:20:21 <liorf95> yes please 16:20:23 <bauzas> or I can explain 16:20:32 <bauzas> maybe some of them don't understand the contect 16:20:36 <bauzas> context 16:20:36 <bauzas> so, 16:20:47 <liorf95> we need this bp to be approved for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823941 16:21:34 <bauzas> basically we had https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823941 that was reviewed 16:21:48 <bauzas> and stephenfin and sean-k-mooney accepted the change 16:21:49 <bauzas> but, 16:22:09 <bauzas> as you can look at the comments, we saw it was actually a feature 16:22:51 <bauzas> that's why I accepted to have a discussion in this meeting to see whether folks accept to merge this one even if we had not accepted the blueprint before 16:23:08 <bauzas> for the moment, there is a procedural -2 from me 16:23:38 <bauzas> but if folks agree here to have an exception for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath as a specless bp, then I could remove it 16:24:07 <bauzas> now, the question : is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath a specless BP and are folks accepting it as a exception ? 16:24:54 <gibi> I've nothing against it. It is just a volume driver so no spec needed. And the change is really small 16:25:12 <bauzas> correct 16:26:02 <bauzas> change is small and only touching a very few places 16:26:27 <sean-k-mooney> i am supprotive fo doign it as a specless blueprint 16:26:42 <bauzas> ok, anyone having concern ? 16:26:45 <sean-k-mooney> its after teh cutoff but the scale of it is small enought that i think an excption can be made 16:26:55 <bauzas> yeah 16:27:08 <opendevreview> Merged openstack/placement master: Extend the RP db query to support any-traits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/825848 16:27:10 <opendevreview> Merged openstack/placement master: DB layer should only depend on trait id not names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/826490 16:27:12 <bauzas> basically we have deadlines for accepted blueprints because they change lots of things 16:27:13 <opendevreview> Merged openstack/placement master: Enhance doc of _get_trees_with_traits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/825780 16:27:16 <opendevreview> Merged openstack/placement master: Extend the RP tree DB query to support any-traits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/825849 16:27:18 <opendevreview> Merged openstack/placement master: Add any-traits support for listing resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/826491 16:27:45 <bauzas> so we're procedural not for the sake of being it, but for making sure we are sure how this works 16:27:57 <bauzas> here, I don't see a problem 16:28:04 <gibi> I agree 16:29:00 <bauzas> ok so, 16:30:25 <bauzas> #agreed specless BP for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nvmeof-multipath as an exception 16:30:35 <bauzas> liorf95: I'll then remove my -2 16:30:41 <bauzas> and +W it 16:30:45 <bauzas> that's it I had 16:31:00 <liorf95> Thanks a lot for your efforts here 16:33:28 <bauzas> any other topic to discuss as a last minute ? 16:33:36 <gibi> - 16:34:16 <bauzas> looks not 16:34:18 <bauzas> thanks all 16:34:22 <bauzas> #endmeeting