16:00:09 <gibi> #startmeeting nova
16:00:09 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug 16 16:00:09 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:09 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:09 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:15 <gibi> o/
16:00:21 <sean-k-mooney> o/
16:01:16 <gibi> lets wait a bit for others
16:01:24 <elodilles> o/
16:03:38 <gibi> OK, lets quickly go through the agenda
16:03:45 <gibi> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:55 <gibi> we have one critical bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1986545
16:04:27 <gibi> we forsee a blocking error in 3.10.6
16:04:38 <gibi> melwitt promised to look into it
16:04:59 <gibi> right now we are not hitting it in the gate because there we have 3.10.4
16:05:26 <sean-k-mooney> ah yes i vaguly recall seeing that go by on irc
16:06:21 <gibi> moving on
16:06:26 <gibi> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 8 new untriaged bugs (-5 since the last meeting)
16:06:32 <gibi> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:06:36 <gibi> #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:06:43 <gibi> I did a bit of triage this morning
16:07:05 <gibi> I saw nothing serious to mention https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-20220809
16:07:21 <gibi> next on our triage roster is melwitt
16:07:58 <gibi> it seem she is not up yet, so I will ask her later
16:08:17 <gibi> any other bug to discuss today?
16:09:18 <gibi> I assume no
16:09:19 <gibi> #topic Gate status
16:09:23 <gibi> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:09:30 <gibi> I don't see any fresh gate bugs there
16:09:38 <gibi> so I think the master gate is OK
16:09:47 <gibi> our periodics:
16:09:52 <gibi> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly
16:09:58 <gibi> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-compute-centos-9-stream&project=openstack%2Fnova&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0
16:10:04 <gibi> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0
16:10:07 <gibi> all green
16:10:12 <gibi> #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:10:16 <gibi> #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
16:10:28 <gibi> is there any gate related topic for today?
16:11:11 <elodilles> nothing from me :X
16:11:17 <gibi> #topic Release Planning
16:11:21 <gibi> #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
16:11:24 <gibi> #info Zed-3 is in 2 weeks
16:11:36 <gibi> please update the status of the bps in the #link Zed tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-blueprint-status
16:12:02 <gibi> I see some movement on https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fupdate-userdata
16:12:10 <gibi> and on https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp%252Fvirtual-iommu-support
16:12:38 <gibi> both has some patches that are waiting for review now
16:12:54 <gibi> I will do a review round tomorrow morning
16:13:09 <gibi> is there any bp you would like to discuss here today/
16:13:10 <gibi> ?
16:13:53 <sean-k-mooney> just a note that the first patch in the vdpa seires
16:13:57 <sean-k-mooney> shoudl be ready
16:14:03 <sean-k-mooney> im still working on the rest
16:14:25 <gibi> ack, I will try to get to it tomorrow
16:15:13 <gibi> I'm putting most of my effor to finish the pci in placement series, and there is plenty of patches to review there too :)
16:15:51 <gibi> fyi if any of you are pushing a bp with a microversion then look at #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-microversions-plan please
16:16:38 <gibi> if nothing else about the blueprints then moving on to
16:16:42 <gibi> #topic Review priorities
16:16:46 <gibi> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:17:25 <gibi> nothing surprising there I think
16:17:53 <gibi> would be nice to have this in sync with our core allocation from the bp tracking. I will try to fix my part of that tomorrow when I review
16:18:16 <gibi> but now moving on
16:18:18 <gibi> #topic Stable Branches
16:18:22 <gibi> elodilles: any news?
16:18:37 <elodilles> not much
16:18:48 <elodilles> but let's go through of them
16:18:57 <elodilles> #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:19:04 <elodilles> #info stable/train (and older) are blocked, see details in the etherpad ^^^
16:19:22 <elodilles> #info train probably can be "fixed" by changing grenade & nova-live-migration to zuul v3 job: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/795435
16:19:51 <sean-k-mooney> that sound like a good thing in general
16:19:52 <elodilles> i've digged up that old patch that was -1'd by me ^^^
16:20:01 <gibi> nice
16:20:24 <elodilles> rebased it and it seems to be working
16:20:30 <sean-k-mooney> ack
16:20:43 <sean-k-mooney> i assume the orginal objection was changing form zullv2 to zuul v3
16:20:46 <sean-k-mooney> after it was released
16:20:54 <elodilles> (i mean, with the intermittent failures - volume operations timeout)
16:21:09 <elodilles> sean-k-mooney: yes
16:21:25 <elodilles> sean-k-mooney: and at that time it was not really needed for train
16:21:45 <sean-k-mooney> ack so now that it is are you ok to proceed in this direction?
16:22:01 <elodilles> but now, somehow it seems it is not facing with the issue we have with the old devstack-gate jobs
16:22:10 <elodilles> sean-k-mooney: yes
16:22:20 <elodilles> and that means we can unblock train at least
16:22:21 <sean-k-mooney> ack then ill try and find time to review it
16:22:47 <elodilles> stein rocky and queens will be still blocked, though
16:22:55 <elodilles> sean-k-mooney: ++
16:23:13 <elodilles> but probably we can even EOL those branches
16:23:26 <elodilles> as there are no interested parties around those branches :/
16:23:35 <gibi> yeah it seems
16:23:47 <elodilles> anyway, this is all i think
16:24:56 <gibi> thanks elodilles
16:25:02 <elodilles> np
16:25:04 <gibi> #topic Open discussion
16:25:09 <gibi> there is noting on the agenda
16:25:16 <gibi> so speak up now if you have someting
16:25:37 <elodilles> -
16:26:28 <gibi> dont be so negative elodilles  ;)
16:26:38 <elodilles> gibi: ++
16:26:39 <elodilles> :D
16:26:40 <JayF> Hey Nova folks; I have a reasonably old Ironic driver backport to stable/victoria, I just found out someone has an install that could use it, if we could land it, I'd appreciate it. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/800873 (elodilles reviewed it a while back, but I didn't update it for a while because I was between openstack-y jobs)
16:26:50 <JayF> whoops, didn't mean to send that until the meeting was over, sorry
16:27:17 <gibi> JayF: that is a good open discussion topic so no worries :)
16:28:04 <gibi> JayF: I will hit that tomorrow morning and I hope elodilles will do it too
16:28:34 <sean-k-mooney> JayF: looks like its already merged in stable wallaby
16:28:38 <JayF> thank you both very much! I will be doing a review of anything that might need backporting to victoria. If that one merges, you might get more :)
16:28:41 <sean-k-mooney> and that the victoria backport
16:28:46 <sean-k-mooney> so i dont think that is contoverial
16:29:25 <sean-k-mooney> the ci logs are mising but they were green
16:29:47 <JayF> That's what I'm hoping, but I know folks are busy and getting attention is often the difficult part. Just had no real reason to promote it until I met an Ironic user today who is having this specific issue and is already mid-upgrade to Victoria :)
16:29:47 <sean-k-mooney> so provide this does not need a rebase i think we can just review it as normal
16:30:06 <sean-k-mooney> ack
16:30:24 <sean-k-mooney> ill add it to my list
16:32:01 <gibi> I feel we are done with the today's meeting
16:32:06 <gibi> thank you all for joining
16:32:08 <gibi> #endmeeting