16:00:19 <gibi> #startmeeting nova
16:00:19 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug 23 16:00:19 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:19 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:19 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:45 <gibi> o/
16:01:08 <elodilles> o/
16:01:41 <sean-k-mooney> o/
16:03:05 <gibi> so lets start
16:03:14 <Uggla> o/
16:03:18 <gibi> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:27 <gibi> #info One Critical bug
16:03:28 <gibi> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1986545
16:03:36 <gibi> this is the same from last week
16:03:46 <gibi> about the novncproxy
16:03:56 <gibi> melwitt has a fix for the unit test
16:03:59 <gibi> and I'm +2
16:04:10 <gibi> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853379
16:04:45 <gibi> so we need another core on it
16:05:52 <gibi> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 8 new untriaged bugs (0 since the last meeting)
16:05:58 <gibi> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 27 open stories (+0 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:06:03 <gibi> #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:06:17 <gibi> the next on the roster is artom
16:06:29 <gibi> artom: will you take the triage baton?
16:06:36 <artom> Yes
16:06:48 <gibi> cool thanks
16:06:54 <gibi> and thanks for the triages melwitt
16:07:00 <gibi> #info bug baton is being passed to artom
16:07:25 <gibi> any specific bug we need to discuss here/
16:07:26 <gibi> ?
16:09:04 <gibi> #topic Gate status
16:09:26 <gibi> we have an unstable test in nova-next enabled recently. We are reverting the patch enabled it #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854132
16:09:43 <gibi> this also needs a second core
16:10:01 <gibi> until that revert lands nova-next will be fairly but not totally red
16:11:09 <gibi> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status
16:11:13 <gibi> it is green
16:11:17 <gibi> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-compute-centos-9-stream&project=openstack%2Fnova&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Centos 9 Stream periodic job status
16:11:21 <gibi> green too
16:11:24 <gibi> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs
16:11:27 <gibi> and green as well
16:11:35 <gibi> #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:11:41 <gibi> #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
16:12:11 <gibi> as a note the current nova-next instability could have been caught if we had stopped using blind rechecks :/
16:12:29 <gibi> anything else about the master gate status?
16:12:35 <JayF> I have a change, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853529, which should help with Ironic changes by not running nova-live-migration tests if only Ironic driver is modified. This should help conserve resources and prevent rechecks by avoiding the tests that can't be broken by Ironic. It's my intention to backport this if/when merged. It only needs one additional
16:12:38 <JayF> core vote.
16:13:07 <gibi> JayF: cool added to my list, I will check it after the meeting
16:13:14 <JayF> thank you gibi, I appreciate it.
16:13:31 <gibi> anything else gate related?
16:13:34 <sean-k-mooney> just yor revert
16:13:34 <sean-k-mooney> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854132
16:13:34 <sean-k-mooney> if we can merge that before it wedges the gate it would be good
16:13:34 <sean-k-mooney> we have 40 hits today
16:14:47 <gibi> sean-k-mooney: yes, we need melwitt or gmann or stephenfin to look at it and approve the revert
16:15:06 <sean-k-mooney> or dansmith if your about
16:15:50 <dansmith> looking
16:16:05 <gibi> thanks
16:16:12 <gibi> anything else about the gate?
16:16:40 <dansmith> got it
16:16:59 <sean-k-mooney> i dont think so
16:17:10 <sean-k-mooney> i have not see any other recurrent failures
16:17:22 <gibi> ack, moving on
16:17:29 <gibi> #topic Release Planning
16:17:35 <gibi> #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
16:17:39 <gibi> #info Zed-3 is in 1 weeks
16:17:43 <gibi> #link Zed tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-blueprint-status
16:17:47 <gibi> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-microversions-plan
16:18:08 <gibi> please update the https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-blueprint-status etherpad with the status of your work
16:19:07 <gibi> and if you have someting that blocking your progress then raise it
16:20:15 <gibi> is there any specific bp we want to talk about today?
16:22:40 <gibi> I see that https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp/volume-backed-server-rebuild+status:open is green but lacking core review
16:23:14 <dansmith> I initially did a bunch of review on it,
16:23:25 <dansmith> but was hoping to get another core to have fresh eyes on it before we merge
16:23:38 <sean-k-mooney> the tempet test is red is that related to teh testcases they are adding
16:23:43 <dansmith> so I'm good to +W that if someone else looks it over, but I had my hands all in it, so I think that'd be better
16:23:57 <dansmith> sean-k-mooney: is it? it was passing at one point
16:24:00 <opendevreview> Merged openstack/nova stable/ussuri: [ironic] Minimize window for a resource provider to be lost  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/853540
16:24:09 <gibi> it is behind https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:bp/update-userdata+status:open where I need to go back and re-review. after that I might be able to look at the rebuild sets but no hard promises
16:24:27 <sean-k-mooney> well some of the jobs on the tempest repo are red but i dont know if the new ones worked
16:24:55 <dansmith> the runs logs are too old, so it needs a recheck
16:25:22 <sean-k-mooney> ack shall i do it or have you already done it
16:25:29 <dansmith> I done did it
16:25:34 <sean-k-mooney> cool
16:25:52 <dansmith> seems unlikely to merge at this late date if it's behind something else for a microversion,
16:25:55 <dansmith> but that kinda sucks because a lot was done on it
16:26:08 <dansmith> so if someone has time to look that'd be nice, maybe we can FFE it if we need
16:26:20 <sean-k-mooney> well it coudl be merge ahead of the other patch
16:26:41 <sean-k-mooney> we might want to swap them since there is an openquestion on the update user data pathc
16:26:54 <gibi> I have the intention to go back the the update user_data patch (that is the next microversion) and also melwitt reviewe that before
16:26:58 <dansmith> it's a cross-project thing where cinder has done a bunch of work to enable it, so it definitely sucks to cause them to miss again
16:27:01 <gibi> so we might be able to unblock the it
16:27:04 <dansmith> already missed last cycle, IIRC
16:27:35 <sean-k-mooney> dansmith: there is only one patch in the other fature to merge
16:27:45 <sean-k-mooney> but yes it woudl be shame if it missed
16:28:05 <dansmith> okay well if we can get someone to look it over while we decide or work on the other, that'd be cool
16:28:10 <dansmith> maybe melwitt would want to look at it
16:28:40 <gibi> ack
16:29:16 <gibi> any other bp to raise?
16:30:15 <sean-k-mooney> am jsut i think the teanat id one is likely not going to land
16:30:38 <gibi> it is in merge conflict since we merged the unittest.mock change ~3weeks ago
16:30:39 <sean-k-mooney> dansmith: i kind of lost track of the SRBAC stuff are there any reverts that still need to land for that
16:30:49 <dansmith> um
16:31:08 <sean-k-mooney> its not really a blue print but basically is there any work we need to have in zed
16:31:14 <dansmith> I think it merged underneath something from gmann
16:31:22 <sean-k-mooney> ok
16:32:01 <dansmith> but I'm not seeing it actually
16:32:17 <dansmith> nope: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/848021
16:32:32 <dansmith> that one and the one above
16:32:48 <sean-k-mooney> ack so those should be set as a review priorty to land for zed
16:32:56 <dansmith> maybe we can get gmann to +2 that and someone else to ack it, yeah
16:33:34 <sean-k-mooney> is gmann on pto i have not spoken to them in a few days
16:33:57 <dansmith> I think something is keeping him busy, but he was around the last few days a little
16:34:04 <gibi> I added that rbac stuff to the tracking etherpad
16:34:10 <dansmith> gibi: thanks
16:34:51 <sean-k-mooney> i think thats the main set that we needed to talk about
16:35:18 <gibi> ack then moving on
16:35:28 <gibi> #topic Review priorities
16:35:33 <gibi> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:35:56 <gibi> looks fairly relevant
16:36:06 <gibi> #topic Stable Branches
16:36:14 <gibi> elodilles: any news from stable/
16:36:15 <gibi> ?
16:36:20 <elodilles> yepp
16:36:24 <elodilles> #info stable/train was unblocked last week (with the backport of the patch that migrated jobs to zuul v3)
16:36:40 <elodilles> #info now only stable/stein (and older) are blocked: grenade and other devstack based jobs fail with the same timeout issue as stable/train was previously
16:36:50 <elodilles> #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:37:19 <sean-k-mooney> elodilles i think there is an issue with cliff on yoga and older by the way
16:37:30 <sean-k-mooney> more for cilometer then us
16:37:32 <elodilles> sean-k-mooney: is it? :-o
16:37:49 <sean-k-mooney> but cliff 4. something  droped python 3.6 support
16:37:59 <sean-k-mooney> so centos 8 stream jobs are failing
16:38:13 <sean-k-mooney> i did see it on stable/victoria on nova however if i am rememebring correctly
16:38:17 <elodilles> isn't that non-voting?
16:38:35 <elodilles> i mean in that case it's not blocking the gate
16:38:47 <sean-k-mooney> not for nova
16:39:09 <sean-k-mooney> i work with peopel that work on ceilometer that are trigng to fix it for there jobs
16:39:23 <sean-k-mooney> just mentioning it as an fyi incase you see stabel review related to it
16:39:41 <elodilles> sean-k-mooney: ack, thanks, i'll look into that
16:40:09 <sean-k-mooney> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/854130
16:40:34 <elodilles> sean-k-mooney: ++
16:40:59 <elodilles> i've noted that patch
16:41:29 <gibi> anything else about stable?
16:41:42 <elodilles> nothing else from me
16:41:45 <gibi> thanks elodilles
16:41:49 <elodilles> np
16:42:05 <gibi> #topic Open discussion
16:42:10 <gibi> nothing on the agenda.
16:42:25 <gibi> does anybody has a topic still for today?
16:43:27 <gibi> I take the silence as no
16:43:33 <gibi> so thanks for joining
16:43:35 <gibi> #endmeeting