16:00:15 <bauzas> #startmeeting nova
16:00:15 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Aug 30 16:00:15 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:15 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:15 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:23 <bauzas> hey folks, happy to see all you again
16:00:31 <gmann> o/
16:00:55 <elodilles> o/
16:01:51 <bauzas> ok, let's start, people will arrive
16:02:16 <bauzas> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:02:25 <bauzas> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:02:34 <bauzas> #info One Critical bug
16:02:37 <bauzas> but,
16:02:45 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1986545 Just sent to the gate
16:03:01 <bauzas> so the fix should be merged soon
16:03:06 <bauzas> thanks melwitt for having worked on it
16:03:21 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 7 new untriaged bugs (-1 since the last meeting)
16:03:27 <bauzas> #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 26 open stories (-1 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement
16:03:33 <bauzas> #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:03:35 <gibi> o/
16:03:53 <bauzas> Uggla wasn't able to attend this meeting, but...
16:04:04 <bauzas> #info bug baton is being passed to Uggla
16:04:21 * bauzas is testing a new leadership, mwawawa
16:04:32 <bauzas> mwahaha even
16:04:48 <gibi> :)
16:05:17 <bauzas> thanks all who looked at bugs while I was off, the progress is impressive
16:05:50 <bauzas> any bug to raise before we move on ?
16:06:32 <bauzas> guess not
16:06:42 <bauzas> #topic Gate status
16:06:45 <bauzas> #topic Gate status
16:06:51 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:06:55 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status
16:07:00 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tempest-integrated-compute-centos-9-stream&project=openstack%2Fnova&pipeline=periodic-weekly Centos 9 Stream periodic job status
16:07:06 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-emulation&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Emulation periodic job runs
16:07:11 <bauzas> #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:07:23 <bauzas> all the job runs are green
16:07:53 <bauzas> haven't seen the gate today, but I have seen that nova-next was failing last week
16:08:14 <bauzas> thanks all who worked on fixing the gate
16:08:39 <bauzas> that being said, any gate failure recently spotted or requiring to be discussed today ?
16:09:09 <gibi> gate seems to be good given we have FF week
16:09:57 <bauzas> indeed
16:10:41 <bauzas> and what a good point for passing to the next topic
16:10:43 <bauzas> :)
16:10:54 <bauzas> #topic Release Planning
16:11:02 <bauzas> #link https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html
16:11:08 <bauzas> #info Zed-3 is in *2 days*
16:11:13 <bauzas> #link Zed tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-blueprint-status
16:11:18 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-zed-microversions-plan
16:11:25 <bauzas> I've looked at the blueprint status
16:11:46 <bauzas> I'll do the launchpad status cleanup later this week
16:11:55 <bauzas> to make sure it shows the right progress
16:12:30 <bauzas> correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm seeing for the moment 3 different series to focus on reviews
16:13:20 <bauzas> oh my bad, 5
16:13:56 <bauzas> from what I've seen, there are reviewing dynamics on the userdata series
16:14:12 <gmann> for RBAC, this is last patch for documentation and releasenotes #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854882
16:14:16 <gibi> I think user_data + rebuild bfv can land today
16:14:21 <gmann> sean-k-mooney is waiting for gibi to review i think?
16:14:36 <bauzas> gibi: and they have a proper microversion, so no conflict is expected besided a small one
16:14:38 <gibi> gmann: ohh, I thought I pushed +A htere
16:14:49 <gibi> gmann: I will fix it right away
16:14:51 <bauzas> besides*
16:15:02 <gmann> gibi: thanks
16:15:13 <bauzas> I'll put my attention to the open reviews tomorrow morning
16:15:31 <gibi> gmann: done
16:16:00 <gmann> thanks again
16:16:06 <dansmith> the top of the bfv one,
16:16:07 <bauzas> fun fact is that I'm asked to write our Zed cycle highlights while app. 50% of the open blueprints are still under review
16:16:16 <bauzas> poke elodilles ;)
16:16:16 <dansmith> just hit a pypi indexing fail, so it will have to be rechecked when it finishes
16:16:50 <sean-k-mooney> gmann: yep was going to appove it if it was not apporve by my end of day by gibi
16:16:50 * elodilles is shocked :-o
16:16:51 <bauzas> do people need a group discussion here at the meeting for any of those series ?
16:17:03 <bauzas> or can we continue to review off the meeting ?
16:17:03 <gmann> sean-k-mooney: thanks.
16:17:52 <sean-k-mooney> i think we can continue off meeting for the most part
16:17:57 <bauzas> cool
16:18:16 <bauzas> #topic Review priorities
16:18:28 <bauzas> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:18:53 <bauzas> most of them are for bugs
16:19:08 <bauzas> I'll look at them after FF
16:19:36 <bauzas> for the two series having a review-prio flag, they are already under great reviewing attention and close to be merged
16:20:37 <bauzas> #topic Stable Branches
16:20:47 <bauzas> elodilles: want to continue ?
16:20:52 <elodilles> yepp, thanks
16:21:12 <elodilles> though, since we are around FF not so much happening around stable branches
16:21:27 <elodilles> #info stable/stein (and older) are blocked: grenade and other devstack based jobs fail with the same timeout issue as stable/train was previously
16:21:44 <elodilles> #info newer branches should be OK
16:21:53 <elodilles> #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:22:11 <elodilles> that's it
16:22:15 <bauzas> thanks
16:23:18 <bauzas> anything to point out ?
16:23:24 <bauzas> if not, we can wrap it up
16:23:55 <elodilles> nothing else from me
16:24:09 <bauzas> ok, last but not the least
16:24:16 <bauzas> #topic Open discussion
16:24:21 <bauzas> nothing is on the agenda
16:24:28 <bauzas> and we're 2 days from FF
16:24:31 <bauzas> anything urgent to raise ?
16:24:45 <bauzas> I maybe have one
16:25:22 <bauzas> this is premature and I don't have the full picture in my mind about the current whole Zed status, but do people feel we should grant some exceptions ?
16:25:32 <bauzas> proactively I mean
16:25:34 <bauzas> not which ones
16:25:46 <bauzas> but should we all agree on discussing this if needed ?
16:26:08 <gibi> we have 2 weeks between FF and RC!
16:26:10 <gibi> RC1
16:26:55 <sean-k-mooney> realisticaly i think if we were too i woudl only extend until the next meeting
16:27:00 <gibi> yeah
16:27:08 <bauzas> yup, me too
16:27:35 <bauzas> if you don't mind, let's just say we're not against that, provided at least one core agreed a series
16:27:36 <gibi> I want to believe that we can land the PCI series but it is a lot of patches
16:27:43 <sean-k-mooney> maybe revisit on thurday
16:27:49 <bauzas> and provided we're able to merge till next week
16:27:54 <sean-k-mooney> gibi: i think we can land enough of it to be useful
16:27:56 <bauzas> sean-k-mooney: correct, that was my point
16:27:59 <sean-k-mooney> unsure if all of it
16:28:03 <bauzas> we're just on a meeting
16:28:15 <bauzas> ok, looks we're in a consensus
16:28:16 <gibi> sean-k-mooney: yeah I feel the same but I would like to aim for all :D
16:28:25 <sean-k-mooney> me too
16:28:41 <bauzas> we just leave the room for this, but we'll anyway consider this on Thursday on a case-by-case basis
16:28:50 <bauzas> that's all I wanted
16:28:55 <sean-k-mooney> +1
16:29:15 <bauzas> that's it for me then
16:29:24 <bauzas> unless someone else has something to raise, we can close
16:29:34 <sean-k-mooney> just one other thing to note dansmith noticed a possible pypi cnd issue that may block things merging for a bit
16:29:50 <sean-k-mooney> hopefuly it will resolve itslef shortly
16:29:56 <gibi> fingers crossed
16:30:23 <bauzas> shit, ok
16:30:44 * bauzas will send hugs to the pypi operators
16:31:01 <bauzas> anyway, thanks all
16:31:03 <sean-k-mooney> there is nothing we can do really so no need to worry right now
16:31:16 <sean-k-mooney> o/
16:31:17 <bauzas> #endmeeting