16:00:32 #startmeeting nova 16:00:32 Meeting started Tue Oct 25 16:00:32 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:33 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:33 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 16:00:42 hey folks and welcome back from the PTG 16:00:50 hope the jetlag didn't hurt you 16:00:59 (jk) 16:01:24 o/ 16:01:28 o/ 16:01:34 let's try to make a short meeting, I have some meetup to attend in a short 16:01:53 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting 16:02:05 #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) 16:02:09 #info No Critical bug 16:02:13 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 8 new untriaged bugs (+4 since the last meeting) 16:02:18 #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster 16:02:30 gibi: fancy taking the baton one more week ? 16:02:36 bauzas: yes, I can 16:02:43 I did one triage last week 16:02:50 oh 16:02:51 and I see there is some fresh incoming 16:02:52 just saw 16:03:02 nothing to tell about the one you triaged ? 16:03:38 looks not 16:03:45 #info bug baton is being passed to gibi 16:03:46 not muhc 16:04:05 #topic Gate status 16:04:10 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs 16:04:14 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status 16:04:20 #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. 16:04:24 #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures 16:04:46 I need to update the FIPS job for adding 30 mins more as we agreed 16:05:11 the placement py39 periodic flipped a bit 16:05:16 but nothing hard to worry 16:05:27 anything to tell here? 16:06:07 i have not really looked since before the ptg so not that im aware of 16:06:29 ++, moving on then 16:06:36 #topic Release Planning 16:06:37 if you dont get to the fips job this week i can do it. sure lets move on 16:06:39 #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html 16:06:46 #info Antelope-1 is planned in 3 weeks 16:07:05 I'll start to propose the first spec review day next week 16:07:16 * gibi checked the placement py39 issue was an CI worker VM issue 16:07:17 #topic PTG wrapup 16:07:35 gibi: thanks, appreciated the quick check 16:07:45 gibi: anyway, we got the next run green 16:07:52 so was just a blip 16:07:53 yes 16:08:03 about the PTG, 16:08:05 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-antelope-ptg Antelope PTG etherpad 16:08:10 #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/030979.html PTG recap 16:08:24 I tried to be short, you can amend my notes by replying like sean-k-mooney did 16:08:50 I still have a couple of things to do, like creating the rfe bugs and checking launchpad for placement 16:09:12 should be done hopefully tomorrow, unless yet another customer asks me something 16:09:27 those bad bad customers :D 16:09:43 gibi: well, it took me a morning to figure out there was no issue at all 16:09:49 you can imagine my mindset at noon 16:10:01 a happy mindset that nova is not buggy :D 16:10:10 * bauzas tries to not appear grumpy even if he's French 16:10:22 but my wife appreciated at lunchtime 16:10:30 anyway, meeting 16:10:35 #topic Review priorities 16:10:44 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) 16:10:49 #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review 16:11:05 ^ this is a new disclaimer, as agreed at the PTG 16:11:20 I started clicking +1 on a few specs 16:12:30 oh, we miss the specs repo in the gerrit query above ! 16:12:56 * bauzas was wondering why he wasn't finding the specs he did set the review-prio flag on 16:13:14 #action bauzas to amend the above gerrit URL to include the specs repo 16:13:46 interestingly, we have a non-core contributor that used the flag for signaling his interest 16:13:58 \o/ 16:14:21 gibi: that's on your patches, I won't ask you how much you bribed him :p 16:14:34 anyway, kidding again 16:14:37 the pci ones 16:14:46 yup 16:15:02 moving on, I need to leave 16:15:06 its proably the person that was asking about that functionality on irc so 16:15:07 I had some private pings during the PTG about the PCI stuff so I let them know where we are and where can they help 16:15:15 #topic Stable Branches 16:15:20 gibi: ah cool to know 16:15:24 elodilles: your turn 16:15:31 thanks 16:15:40 so as we discussed at PTG 16:15:43 #info stein, rocky and queens EOL'ing patch was proposed: https://review.opendev.org/862520 + mail was sent to ML https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-October/030980.html 16:15:54 and the status: 16:15:56 #info from stable/zed back till stable/ussuri branches' gates should be OK 16:15:59 #info stable/train must have been fixed ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-gate/+/860961 ) 16:16:09 #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci 16:16:11 I'm OK with the EOL patch 16:16:24 bauzas: cool \o/ 16:16:34 I'll review the hashes but given you probably made it with the tooling in place, I don't expect problems 16:16:38 let's do the formal waiting and then we can merge it 16:16:47 and delete those old broken branches :'( 16:16:48 and then I'll set the PTL-approval 16:16:59 bauzas: ++ 16:17:10 elodilles: true, let's wait but I'll still send the signal I'm ok with the deletion 16:17:19 anything else to mention ? 16:17:24 nothing from me 16:17:28 elodilles: thanks, that was quick 16:17:33 ++ 16:17:39 #topic Open discussion 16:17:44 nothing written 16:17:50 anything anyone ? 16:18:19 iirc, some actions were made at the PTG to propose specless blueprints at weekly meetings 16:18:36 I don't remember yet which blueprints and who, but we can arrange this later 16:18:47 oh the neutron thing 16:18:49 from sean-k-mooney 16:19:01 whether this was a bugfix or bluepritn 16:19:11 if you don't mind, let's punt this for next week 16:19:35 I don't hear screams 16:19:39 eventually... 16:19:44 thanks all, 16:19:47 #endmeeting