16:01:28 <bauzas> #startmeeting nova 16:01:28 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Dec 6 16:01:28 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:28 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:28 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 16:01:33 <bauzas> sorry, was late 16:01:53 <bauzas> howdy everyone 16:02:04 <bauzas> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting 16:02:23 <elodilles> o/ 16:03:18 <Kirill_> o/ 16:03:26 <bauzas> looks like we maybe not have a lot of quorum 16:03:30 <bauzas> but let's start 16:03:35 <bauzas> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) 16:03:40 <bauzas> #info No Critical bug 16:03:45 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 18 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting) 16:03:50 <bauzas> #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster 16:03:57 <bauzas> elodilles: anything to discuss about bugs ? 16:04:07 <elodilles> maybe one question 16:04:21 <elodilles> had a bug: explicit fixed ip request assigns random ip: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1998927 16:04:33 <elodilles> this is i think python-openstackclient 16:04:50 <elodilles> how can i reroute this? o:) 16:04:50 * bauzas clicks 16:06:07 <bauzas> elodilles: yup, looks to me an OSC issue 16:06:16 <bauzas> "the fixed ip command assigns random IP even if we ask an IP explicitly" 16:06:26 <bauzas> you mean, because of OSC ? 16:06:39 <bauzas> if so, we need to change the project in Launchpad 16:06:40 <elodilles> i think so 16:06:43 <bauzas> lemme do it 16:06:58 <bauzas> "also affects project" > openstackclient 16:07:12 <elodilles> oh, cool, thanks 16:07:29 <bauzas> oh snap 16:07:42 <bauzas> "python-openstackclient doesn't use Launchpad to track its bugs. If you know this bug has been reported in another bug tracker, you can link to it; Launchpad will keep track of its status for you. " 16:07:52 <bauzas> StoryBoard my love 16:08:08 <bauzas> then you should close the bug 16:08:23 <bauzas> and ask the report to create a Storyboard issue for osc 16:08:26 <bauzas> lemme find it 16:08:28 <elodilles> bauzas: ack, will do that 16:08:42 <elodilles> bauzas: i'll do that after the meeting 16:08:57 <elodilles> bauzas: no need to spend time with it now :) 16:09:00 <bauzas> https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/975 16:09:08 <elodilles> thx :) 16:09:14 <bauzas> it was simple to find https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/latest/#contributing 16:09:43 <bauzas> elodilles: ok, I'll then let you triage this bug 16:09:50 <bauzas> and thanks for it 16:10:03 <elodilles> np 16:10:43 <bauzas> moving on then 16:10:53 <bauzas> #info bug baton is being passed to bauzas 16:11:05 <bauzas> I'll try to triage it, but I have a lot of other priorities 16:11:13 <bauzas> anyway 16:11:20 <bauzas> #topic Gate status 16:11:28 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs 16:11:33 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status 16:11:39 <bauzas> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/866049 proposal to add more delay for centos9s-fips job 16:11:52 <bauzas> I'd appreciate if some people like sean-k-mooney or others could review this change ^ 16:12:48 <bauzas> mkopec had a thought to skip some tests for this job instead of adding more delays 16:16:17 <bauzas> anyway, moving 16:16:24 <bauzas> #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. 16:16:31 <bauzas> #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures 16:16:35 <bauzas> #topic Release Planning 16:16:41 <bauzas> tick-tock 16:16:47 <bauzas> #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html 16:16:51 <bauzas> #info Antelope-2 is in 4 weeks 16:16:58 <bauzas> 4 weeks and in between a xmas period 16:17:06 <bauzas> so you know. 16:17:37 <bauzas> I forgot to write the email for next week's review day, I'll do it tomorrow hopefuly 16:17:46 <bauzas> moving on ? 16:18:49 <bauzas> looks so 16:18:57 <bauzas> #topic Review priorities 16:19:03 <bauzas> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) 16:19:08 <bauzas> #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review 16:19:15 <bauzas> anything to discuss about priorities ? 16:20:07 <opendevreview> Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Reproducer for bug 1951656 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866157 16:20:08 <opendevreview> Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Handle mdev devices in libvirt 7.7+ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866158 16:20:34 <bauzas> nevermind the above ^ (doing two things at same time) 16:20:39 <bauzas> looks not, moving on 16:20:47 <bauzas> #topic Stable Branches 16:21:03 <bauzas> elodilles: you could have an opportunity to not lemme discuss alone :) 16:21:17 <elodilles> :) 16:21:18 <elodilles> yepp 16:21:29 <elodilles> actually stable gates were quiet 16:21:37 <elodilles> i mean patches merged :) 16:21:41 <bauzas> correct, I worked on the stable branches 16:21:46 <elodilles> #info stable branches seem to be unblocked / OK 16:21:50 <bauzas> and I haven't seen any problems so far 16:21:52 <elodilles> #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci 16:21:59 <bauzas> down to wallaby at least 16:21:59 <elodilles> neither have i 16:22:23 <elodilles> i've seen merged patches even older than wallaby 16:22:29 <bauzas> you know, nothing to tell is better than saying anything here in this section :) 16:22:37 <elodilles> yepp :) 16:22:46 <bauzas> moving on then, and profit. 16:22:49 <elodilles> ++ 16:22:52 <elodilles> :) 16:22:52 <bauzas> #topic Open discussion 16:23:04 <Kirill_> can someone review this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/863773 . sean-k-mooney already reviewed and and set +1, need more reviews for setting +2, right? 16:23:07 <bauzas> I had a question but I don't see a quorum 16:23:24 <bauzas> Kirill_: nod, lemme see 16:23:41 <Kirill_> thanks 16:23:41 <bauzas> ah that one 16:23:50 <bauzas> sure, I'll do some review 16:23:56 <sahid_> o/ then, i have one regarding review priority 16:24:14 <bauzas> sahid_: sure, shoot 16:24:40 <sahid_> thanks 16:24:51 <sahid_> it's just to know, we have this that had the bit Review-Priority 16:24:52 <sahid_> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/857838 16:25:09 <sahid_> I'm wondering whtehr the impl can I have also that bit, or if it's a different process? 16:25:12 <sahid_> :-) 16:25:27 <bauzas> sahid_: surely, you can ask for it :) 16:25:42 <bauzas> sahid_: ping us tomorrow and we'll see 16:25:53 <bauzas> looks there are not a lot of people around atm 16:26:08 <sahid_> yeah... no worries, will see that tomorrow 16:26:10 <sahid_> thanks a lot 16:27:02 <bauzas> np 16:27:36 <bauzas> so let's end this meeting for now, I'll ask about which meetings to skip during the xmas period next week 16:27:55 <bauzas> anyone having anything to raise before we say it's a wrap ? 16:28:34 <bauzas> looks not, 16:28:39 <bauzas> thanks all 16:28:43 <bauzas> #endmeeting