16:01:28 #startmeeting nova 16:01:28 Meeting started Tue Dec 6 16:01:28 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:28 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 16:01:33 sorry, was late 16:01:53 howdy everyone 16:02:04 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting 16:02:23 o/ 16:03:18 o/ 16:03:26 looks like we maybe not have a lot of quorum 16:03:30 but let's start 16:03:35 #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) 16:03:40 #info No Critical bug 16:03:45 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 18 new untriaged bugs (+2 since the last meeting) 16:03:50 #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster 16:03:57 elodilles: anything to discuss about bugs ? 16:04:07 maybe one question 16:04:21 had a bug: explicit fixed ip request assigns random ip: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1998927 16:04:33 this is i think python-openstackclient 16:04:50 how can i reroute this? o:) 16:04:50 * bauzas clicks 16:06:07 elodilles: yup, looks to me an OSC issue 16:06:16 "the fixed ip command assigns random IP even if we ask an IP explicitly" 16:06:26 you mean, because of OSC ? 16:06:39 if so, we need to change the project in Launchpad 16:06:40 i think so 16:06:43 lemme do it 16:06:58 "also affects project" > openstackclient 16:07:12 oh, cool, thanks 16:07:29 oh snap 16:07:42 "python-openstackclient doesn't use Launchpad to track its bugs. If you know this bug has been reported in another bug tracker, you can link to it; Launchpad will keep track of its status for you. " 16:07:52 StoryBoard my love 16:08:08 then you should close the bug 16:08:23 and ask the report to create a Storyboard issue for osc 16:08:26 lemme find it 16:08:28 bauzas: ack, will do that 16:08:42 bauzas: i'll do that after the meeting 16:08:57 bauzas: no need to spend time with it now :) 16:09:00 https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/975 16:09:08 thx :) 16:09:14 it was simple to find https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/latest/#contributing 16:09:43 elodilles: ok, I'll then let you triage this bug 16:09:50 and thanks for it 16:10:03 np 16:10:43 moving on then 16:10:53 #info bug baton is being passed to bauzas 16:11:05 I'll try to triage it, but I have a lot of other priorities 16:11:13 anyway 16:11:20 #topic Gate status 16:11:28 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs 16:11:33 #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status 16:11:39 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/866049 proposal to add more delay for centos9s-fips job 16:11:52 I'd appreciate if some people like sean-k-mooney or others could review this change ^ 16:12:48 mkopec had a thought to skip some tests for this job instead of adding more delays 16:16:17 anyway, moving 16:16:24 #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. 16:16:31 #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures 16:16:35 #topic Release Planning 16:16:41 tick-tock 16:16:47 #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html 16:16:51 #info Antelope-2 is in 4 weeks 16:16:58 4 weeks and in between a xmas period 16:17:06 so you know. 16:17:37 I forgot to write the email for next week's review day, I'll do it tomorrow hopefuly 16:17:46 moving on ? 16:18:49 looks so 16:18:57 #topic Review priorities 16:19:03 #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2) 16:19:08 #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review 16:19:15 anything to discuss about priorities ? 16:20:07 Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Reproducer for bug 1951656 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866157 16:20:08 Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: Handle mdev devices in libvirt 7.7+ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/866158 16:20:34 nevermind the above ^ (doing two things at same time) 16:20:39 looks not, moving on 16:20:47 #topic Stable Branches 16:21:03 elodilles: you could have an opportunity to not lemme discuss alone :) 16:21:17 :) 16:21:18 yepp 16:21:29 actually stable gates were quiet 16:21:37 i mean patches merged :) 16:21:41 correct, I worked on the stable branches 16:21:46 #info stable branches seem to be unblocked / OK 16:21:50 and I haven't seen any problems so far 16:21:52 #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci 16:21:59 down to wallaby at least 16:21:59 neither have i 16:22:23 i've seen merged patches even older than wallaby 16:22:29 you know, nothing to tell is better than saying anything here in this section :) 16:22:37 yepp :) 16:22:46 moving on then, and profit. 16:22:49 ++ 16:22:52 :) 16:22:52 #topic Open discussion 16:23:04 can someone review this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/863773 . sean-k-mooney already reviewed and and set +1, need more reviews for setting +2, right? 16:23:07 I had a question but I don't see a quorum 16:23:24 Kirill_: nod, lemme see 16:23:41 thanks 16:23:41 ah that one 16:23:50 sure, I'll do some review 16:23:56 o/ then, i have one regarding review priority 16:24:14 sahid_: sure, shoot 16:24:40 thanks 16:24:51 it's just to know, we have this that had the bit Review-Priority 16:24:52 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/857838 16:25:09 I'm wondering whtehr the impl can I have also that bit, or if it's a different process? 16:25:12 :-) 16:25:27 sahid_: surely, you can ask for it :) 16:25:42 sahid_: ping us tomorrow and we'll see 16:25:53 looks there are not a lot of people around atm 16:26:08 yeah... no worries, will see that tomorrow 16:26:10 thanks a lot 16:27:02 np 16:27:36 so let's end this meeting for now, I'll ask about which meetings to skip during the xmas period next week 16:27:55 anyone having anything to raise before we say it's a wrap ? 16:28:34 looks not, 16:28:39 thanks all 16:28:43 #endmeeting