16:00:38 <bauzas> #startmeeting nova
16:00:38 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Feb 21 16:00:38 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:38 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:38 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:46 <Uggla> o/
16:00:55 <bauzas> hey folks, hola everyone
16:01:06 <dansmith> o/
16:01:15 <bauzas> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:01:29 <elodilles> o/
16:01:46 <bauzas> let's start, some people have to leave early
16:01:57 <bauzas> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:02:03 <bauzas> #info No Critical bug
16:02:08 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 16 new untriaged bugs (-1 since the last meeting)
16:02:12 <gibi> o/
16:02:19 <bauzas> auniyal helped me with triage
16:02:33 <bauzas> I created an etherpad
16:02:44 <bauzas> and I have a bug I'd like to discuss with you folks
16:02:59 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-20230214
16:03:10 <bauzas> the bug in question :
16:03:13 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2006770
16:03:28 <bauzas> as you see, i did set it to Opinion
16:03:42 <bauzas> tl;dr: this is about our ip query param for instances list
16:03:57 <bauzas> we directly call Neutron to get the ports
16:04:07 <bauzas> it basically works, but the reporter had some concerns
16:05:14 <bauzas> people want to discuss this bug now or later ?
16:05:27 <bauzas> (we can discuss it in the open disc topic if we have time)
16:06:02 <bauzas> let's say later then :)
16:06:14 <bauzas> (people can lookup the bug if they want meanwhile)
16:06:17 <dansmith> opinion seems right to me :)
16:06:47 <bauzas> let's discuss this then later in the open discussion topic
16:06:53 <bauzas> so people will have time
16:06:55 <bauzas> moving on
16:07:02 <bauzas> #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:07:20 <bauzas> Uggla: works for you to get the baton this week ?
16:07:28 <Uggla> bauzas, ok
16:07:32 <bauzas> ack
16:07:37 <bauzas> #info bug baton is being passed to Uggla
16:07:42 <bauzas> #topic Gate status
16:07:48 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:07:55 <bauzas> but the best is to track the etherpad
16:08:00 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures
16:08:15 <bauzas> it was a dodgy week
16:08:36 <dansmith> so,
16:08:41 <dansmith> this got merged: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/873646
16:08:52 <dansmith> which seems to allow halving the memory used by mysqld
16:09:08 <bauzas> haha, gtk
16:09:08 <dansmith> which may help with the OOM issues we see, especially in the fat jobs like ceph-multistore
16:09:31 <dansmith> we could enable that in our nova-ceph-multistore job if we want to be on the leading edge and try to make sure that it's actually helping
16:09:36 <dansmith> (it's opt-in right now)
16:09:39 <bauzas> indeed, I'll double check later if we continue to have some OOM issues
16:09:48 <bauzas> ah my bad
16:09:58 <dansmith> we could remove it if it causes other problems, but.. might be good to try it
16:10:14 <bauzas> surely
16:10:20 <bauzas> dansmith: thanks for having worked on it
16:10:35 <bauzas> dansmith: I can write a zuul patch for novza
16:10:45 <dansmith> I can do it too, just wanted to socialize
16:10:57 <bauzas> dansmith: ack cool then, ping me for reviews
16:11:02 <dansmith> ack
16:11:25 <bauzas> ++ again
16:12:03 <bauzas> dansmith: I also need to look at all the Gerrit recheck comments I wrote last week
16:12:12 <bauzas> I maybe found some other races
16:12:18 <bauzas> but we'll see
16:13:11 <bauzas> we also have the OOM logger patch that was telling us a few things
16:13:46 <bauzas> https://paste.opendev.org/show/bfvZX0XeKsELzY54EGb8/
16:13:54 <bauzas> but let's discuss this off-meeting
16:14:19 * gibi had not time to look at the extra logs from the functional race
16:15:18 <bauzas> gibi: basically, each of the 6 failures having logs was having a different functest
16:15:37 <gibi> cool, that can serve as a basis for a local repor
16:15:50 <bauzas> anyway, moving on
16:15:52 <sean-k-mooney1> bauzas: they are all in teh libvirt test suite
16:16:01 <sean-k-mooney1> so likely all have the same common issue
16:16:11 <sean-k-mooney1> but ya lets move on
16:16:14 <bauzas> maybe, I didn't had time yet to look at the code
16:16:23 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:16:28 <bauzas> all of them are green ^
16:16:35 <bauzas> #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:16:40 <bauzas> #info STOP DOING BLIND RECHECKS aka. 'recheck' https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/testing.html#how-to-handle-test-failures
16:16:44 <bauzas> that's it
16:16:50 <bauzas> #topic Release Planning
16:16:57 <bauzas> #link https://releases.openstack.org/antelope/schedule.html
16:17:05 <bauzas> so we're now on Feature Freeze
16:17:10 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-antelope-blueprint-status Blueprint status for 2023.1
16:17:16 <bauzas> you can see what we merged
16:17:36 <bauzas> I also created two changes for my own series that were asked
16:17:46 <bauzas> but I'll ping folks tomorrow about them
16:17:56 <bauzas> #info Antelope-rc1 is in 1.5 weeks
16:18:18 <bauzas> now, we need to prepare for our RC1 where we branch master
16:18:31 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-antelope-rc-potential
16:18:40 <bauzas> as you see ^ I created an etherpad
16:18:54 <bauzas> thanks btw. again takashi for creating some changes that are needed
16:19:26 <bauzas> as a reminder, if people find some bugs, they can use a specific tag :
16:19:32 <bauzas> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=antelope-rc-potential
16:19:54 <bauzas> before RC1, any bug report can be using this tag, but we prefer to make sure they are regressions
16:20:04 <bauzas> after RC1, only regressions should use this tag
16:20:29 <bauzas> I created a cycle highlights change too :
16:20:43 <bauzas> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/874483 Cycle highlights for Nova Antelope
16:20:48 <bauzas> please review it
16:21:25 <bauzas> at least gibi, dansmith, artom and other folks that were having merged changes
16:21:40 <gibi> ack
16:21:46 <bauzas> I'll +1 on Thursday
16:22:02 <bauzas> we need to merge this before this Thursday for the Foundation market folks
16:22:38 <bauzas> we also have https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/874450 to +1
16:22:47 <bauzas> I guess we're done with our clients
16:23:20 <bauzas> so I'll branch os-vif, osc-placement and novaclient unless people have concerns
16:23:46 <bauzas> as you see in the commit msg, it will be merged eventually on Friday
16:24:09 * bauzas will just verify the SHA1
16:24:10 <elodilles> or earlier if a release liaison +1s it
16:24:27 <bauzas> elodilles: yup, but I'm asking people if they have concerns
16:24:33 <sean-k-mooney1> speaking of which im not sure if i ill have time to continue to do that
16:24:44 <bauzas> looks not, so I'll just verify the SHA1s before +1ing
16:24:54 <sean-k-mooney1> i may leave my slef for this cycle if no on else want to take on that role
16:25:08 <bauzas> sean-k-mooney1: yup, I know and I was planning to ask you
16:25:13 <sean-k-mooney1> but i am not sure of my aviablity to keep an eye on it this cycle
16:25:35 <bauzas> ok, so maybe it's not time yet to ask if someone else wants to be a release liaison
16:25:48 <bauzas> but I'll officially ask it next week
16:25:51 <sean-k-mooney> ok
16:26:00 <bauzas> we can have more than one release liaison btw.
16:26:16 <bauzas> no need to remove you before someone arrives or something like that
16:26:43 <sean-k-mooney> ack the primary role is to reducec the bus factor and ensure that release are done correctly and in a timply fashion so it does not all fall on the PTL
16:26:43 <bauzas> and we can even have *two* liaisons if we really find *two* people wanting to be :)
16:26:46 <bauzas> no need to battle :po
16:27:07 <bauzas> I'll explain next week what a release liaison is and what they do
16:27:21 <bauzas> but if people want, they can DM me
16:27:34 <bauzas> before next meeting
16:28:04 <bauzas> #info If someone wants to run as a Nova release liaison next cycle, please ping bauzas
16:28:34 <bauzas> I think that's it for the RC1 agenda
16:28:36 <bauzas> oh
16:28:43 <bauzas> one last thing
16:29:01 <bauzas> thanks to takashi, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/872068 is merged
16:29:10 <bauzas> you can now add your specs for Bocat
16:29:13 <bauzas> Bobcat even
16:30:05 <bauzas> like, people who had accepted specs for Antelope can just repropose them for Bobcat and I'll quickly +2/+W directly if nothing changes between both spec files
16:30:23 * bauzas tries to not eye at folks
16:31:00 <bauzas> I'll do the Launchpad Bobcat magic later next week (I guess)
16:31:07 <bauzas> that's it this time
16:31:22 <bauzas> #topic vPTG Planning
16:31:30 <bauzas> as a weekly reminder :
16:31:32 <bauzas> #link https://www.eventbrite.com/e/project-teams-gathering-march-2023-tickets-483971570997 Register your free ticket
16:31:46 * gibi needs to drop, will read back tomorrow
16:31:56 <bauzas> maybe you haven't seen but we are officially a PTG team
16:32:13 <bauzas> I don't know yet how long we could run the vPTG sessions
16:32:32 <bauzas> but like every cycle, I'll ask your opinions about the timing
16:32:41 <bauzas> not today, but once I'm asked
16:32:58 <bauzas> good time for saying
16:33:03 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bobcat-ptg Draft PTG etherpad
16:33:12 <bauzas> I feel alone with this etherpad ^
16:33:24 <bauzas> and I'm sure people have topics they want to discuss
16:34:25 <bauzas> anyway, moving on
16:34:33 <bauzas> (just hoping people read our meeting notes)
16:34:41 <bauzas> #topic Review priorities
16:34:50 <bauzas> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+(label:Review-Priority%252B1+OR+label:Review-Priority%252B2)
16:34:54 <bauzas> #info As a reminder, cores eager to review changes can +1 to indicate their interest, +2 for committing to the review
16:35:08 <bauzas> #topic Stable Branches
16:35:14 <bauzas> elodilles: your turn
16:35:28 <elodilles> #info stable gates seem to be OK (victoria gate workaround has landed and it is now unblocked)
16:35:36 <elodilles> well, unblocked
16:35:52 <elodilles> though it's not everywhere easy to merge in patches
16:36:03 <elodilles> #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:36:26 <bauzas> indeed
16:36:35 <elodilles> that's the short summary
16:36:42 <bauzas> I still have the ussuri CVE VMDK fix to be merged
16:36:50 <bauzas> I rechecked it a few times
16:37:00 <bauzas> elodilles: thanks for the notes
16:37:04 <elodilles> np
16:37:13 <bauzas> #topic Open discussion
16:37:19 <bauzas> so, nothing on the agenda
16:37:47 <bauzas> we can discuss https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2006770 if people want or close the meeting
16:37:56 <bauzas> the fact is, I wrote Opinion
16:38:04 <bauzas> unless people have concerns with what I wrote, I'm done.
16:39:07 <bauzas> looks not
16:39:11 <bauzas> then I assume we're done.
16:40:16 <dansmith> ++
16:40:18 <bauzas> thanks all
16:40:23 <bauzas> #endmeeting