16:00:41 #startmeeting nova 16:00:41 Meeting started Tue Aug 15 16:00:41 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:41 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:41 The meeting name has been set to 'nova' 16:00:44 o/ 16:00:46 o/ 16:01:45 o/ 16:02:10 OK, lets get started 16:02:16 this will be a sort meeting 16:02:25 #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) 16:02:40 I don't see any critical bugs 16:03:03 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 40 new untriaged bugs (+0 since the last meeting) 16:03:46 based on the roster elodilles had the baton for a long time 16:04:09 yepp o:) i've tried to triage some bugs :) 16:04:13 thanks 16:04:16 np 16:04:39 I think we can let that baton be on PTO until bauzas is back 16:04:55 ++ 16:05:09 at least I don't know where to assign it 16:05:12 so 16:05:15 #info bug baton is PTO 16:05:19 #info bug baton is on PTO 16:05:34 do we have any bugs that needs discussion? 16:06:07 o/ 16:06:19 i don't have any to mention (though feel free to look for the bugs if i misjudged any of them) 16:07:31 #topic Gate status 16:07:38 hoo boy 16:07:56 things are definitely improving but we still have work to do 16:08:22 this isn't really gate status, but one thing I've noticed while looking at countless gate logs is that we've had a bunch of lazy-loads sneak in, 16:08:36 up to five per object one after another for several operations 16:08:46 at least less timeout and oom i think 16:08:53 I started work on making them visible and have been squashing them here: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:reduce-lazy-loads 16:09:21 dansmith: nice 16:09:37 is there any specific issue we need to discuss? 16:09:37 I dunno how others feel, but I think 1 lazy load per object per service should be enough, and any time we need to lazy-load more than one thing, we probably should have pre-queried for the thing 16:09:53 dansmith: in general I agree 16:10:05 especially if we always do the two lazy loads unconditionally 16:10:11 so while it's not really clearly stability-related, doing this will reduce our load on rabbit, the db, and conductor which I'm sure will help gate performance 16:10:16 yeah 16:10:25 I agree 16:10:41 the other gate failure I know of, which I haven't seen much since discussing with melwitt, was the ceph job seeming to hang n-cpu 16:10:52 I think she was looking at it but I don't know if there was any outcome 16:11:20 OK 16:11:27 thanks for the update 16:11:41 and then aside from that, plenty of small things but nothing large enough to be specifically noteworthy on its own that I know of 16:12:41 I started to look into https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_1fe/889992/2/gate/nova-tox-functional-py39/1fefb65/testr_results.html on Friday but no real breakthrough yet 16:12:49 cool 16:13:14 one thing to note, rebuild tests have refactored which was failing more. it work on its own server now and should be less on disturbing the thing on class level server 16:13:41 gmann: thanks for the heads up 16:14:04 and py3.11 testing started, this is fix from frickler for nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891256/2 16:14:21 and in child patch we can see job is passing 16:14:44 idea is to add py3.11 unit test job as non voting in this cycle and make it voting in next cycle 16:15:26 sounds good 16:15:58 I approved the bindep change now as that was simple enough :) 16:16:03 thanks 16:16:13 anything else about our gate? 16:16:31 nothing else from me 16:17:06 #topic Release Planning 16:17:15 3 weeks left until Feature Freeze 16:17:36 anything to raise here? 16:18:52 #topic Stable Branches 16:19:00 elodilles: your turn :) 16:19:04 o7 16:19:13 there was not much activity on stable branches 16:19:33 if the gate issues did not cause any problem on stable gates, then 16:19:40 #info all stable gates should be OK 16:19:40 :) 16:19:47 #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci 16:19:54 and that's all from me 16:20:30 thanks 16:20:37 others, any comment on stable? 16:21:26 #topic Open discussion 16:21:31 any other business? 16:21:49 nay 16:22:03 i havent really looked at the sabel brances in a a few weeks and no other business form me 16:22:03 - 16:22:21 OK. Then thanks for joining. :) 16:22:24 #endmeeting