16:00:53 <bauzas> #startmeeting nova
16:00:53 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Tue Mar  5 16:00:53 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:53 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:53 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:01:00 <bauzas> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
16:01:07 <bauzas> heya everyone
16:01:16 <fwiesel> \o
16:01:52 <bauzas> who's around ?
16:02:23 <Uggla> o/
16:03:03 <gibi> o/
16:03:10 <elodilles> o/
16:03:12 <bauzas> maybe we should skip if we don't have quorum
16:03:46 <auniyal> o/
16:04:13 <bauzas> okay, let's try then to have a quick meeting
16:04:18 <bauzas> #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:04:23 <bauzas> #info No Critical bug
16:04:26 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 75 new untriaged bugs (+5 since the last meeting)
16:04:30 <bauzas> #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:04:35 <bauzas> #info bug baton is bauzas
16:04:47 <bauzas> it's my duty, I'll look this week at the bugs because of RC1
16:05:42 <bauzas> moving on ?
16:06:54 <bauzas> looks so
16:07:30 <bauzas> #topic Gate status
16:07:34 <bauzas> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:07:39 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
16:07:44 <bauzas> #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:07:49 <bauzas> #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:08:50 <bauzas> anything to report ?
16:10:23 <sean-k-mooney> there were some post job hook failures
16:10:31 <sean-k-mooney> im just looking at them now but not sure there is a pattern
16:10:40 <sean-k-mooney> have others seen issues with post failtures
16:11:27 <sean-k-mooney> i saw  echo 'Creating ephemeral test server on subnode' fail in two diffent test befauce we didnt get a list of flavors
16:11:38 <sean-k-mooney> HttpException: 500: Server Error for url: https://158.69.64.59/compute/v2.1/flavors/detail?is_public=True, Internal Server Error
16:11:42 <bauzas> yeah I did a couple of rechecks
16:12:32 <bauzas> the ones I saw were for ceph-live-migration
16:12:33 <sean-k-mooney> ok i guess we can see if that continues
16:13:14 <sean-k-mooney> the ones i was looking at just now were in nova-live-migration nova-next and nova-ovs-hybrid-plug
16:13:20 <bauzas> ack
16:13:28 <bauzas> moving on then
16:13:31 <sean-k-mooney> oh POST_FAILURE in 19m 30s
16:13:54 <sean-k-mooney> so they failed on something else because that way to fast for a devstack job to be in post
16:14:12 <sean-k-mooney> so the post playbooks are failign becuase we didnt install perperly is my guess
16:15:21 <sean-k-mooney> we can move on
16:15:59 <bauzas> sure
16:16:05 <bauzas> #topic Release Planning
16:16:09 <bauzas> #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html#nova
16:16:13 <bauzas> #info Caracal-3 (and feature freeze) delivered
16:16:25 <bauzas> #info RC1 in 1.5 weekqs
16:16:34 <bauzas> that's basically itr
16:16:50 <bauzas> we'll have a caracal retro in the next PTG
16:17:06 <bauzas> anything else ?
16:18:01 <bauzas> #topic Review priorities
16:18:06 <bauzas> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-status
16:18:11 <bauzas> I amended the etherpad
16:18:22 <bauzas> for this week and the next one, please look at the bugfixes
16:18:34 <bauzas> I'll prepare a specific etherpad for RC1
16:19:16 <bauzas> any questions ?
16:20:29 <bauzas> ok, moving on
16:20:34 <bauzas> #topic Stable Branches
16:20:39 <bauzas> elodilles: floor is yours
16:20:48 <elodilles> #info stable gates seem to be OK
16:21:09 <elodilles> stable/2023.2, stable/2023.1 and stable/zed respectively
16:21:46 <elodilles> xena, wallaby and victoria will go to unmaintained in #minutes :)
16:21:58 <elodilles> #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:22:15 <elodilles> that's all i think
16:22:41 <bauzas> elodilles: and as I said, I'll look at the paperwork :)
16:22:56 <elodilles> bauzas: ACK, thanks in advance :]
16:24:05 <bauzas> ok, moving on
16:24:20 <opendevreview> sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: add pyproject.toml to support pip 23.1  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899753
16:25:17 <bauzas> #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:25:22 <fwiesel> #info FIPS instablility caused by MAC learning issue, still debugging
16:25:27 <bauzas> fwiesel: floor is yours :p
16:25:42 <bauzas> fwiesel: ack
16:25:43 <fwiesel> Digging down and learning things about OVS, but not much progress there to report
16:25:52 <fwiesel> #info Proposed bug fixes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/909474 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/910627 would bring tempest failures down to one
16:26:08 <fwiesel> if you retry often enough, due to the MAC learning issue
16:26:14 <fwiesel> #link http://openstack-ci-logs.global.cloud.sap/sapcc-nova-ib3088cfce4f7a0b24f05d45e7830b011c4a39f42-jf2kd/tempest.html
16:26:22 <fwiesel> That's how it should look like then
16:26:38 <bauzas> fwiesel: don't hesitate to ping me for reviews
16:27:02 <fwiesel> Sure, I will. The first proposal is probably introducing a new bug, I have to dig into that first.
16:27:07 <sean-k-mooney> fwiesel: thanks for posting the ci links in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/910627
16:27:22 <fwiesel> Which brings us to the last one:
16:27:24 <fwiesel> #info Outstanding failure likely not vmware specific: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2055700. Rebuild + bfv + reimage-boot-volume: First driver.destroy, then driver.detach_volume (then driver.spawn)
16:27:38 <sean-k-mooney> is VMware NSX CI the old ci acconut
16:28:03 <fwiesel> sean-k-mooney: Yes, the VMware NSX CI is the old account from Vmware.
16:28:22 <sean-k-mooney> ack do we have an eta for when your ci will start commenting
16:29:32 <fwiesel> Well, I haven't prioritized it, as it is fairly instable.
16:29:54 <sean-k-mooney> ack i guess we can look at http://openstack-ci-logs.global.cloud.sap/
16:29:54 <fwiesel> It would be probably just a days work to make it comment, but the output would be a bit random
16:29:58 <sean-k-mooney> and seach by the change id
16:30:40 <sean-k-mooney> fwiesel: basically instead of pinging you for the link on each patch i just want to find a way to look for the ci result
16:30:41 <fwiesel> That should work. I have to check, if I haven't broken it.
16:31:35 <sean-k-mooney> ack that will help us understand if the patches we are reviewing are fixing the probelmn and or breakign other things
16:32:08 <fwiesel> Yes, but the CI is not yet stable for reasons outside of the patches.
16:32:36 <sean-k-mooney> ack
16:32:49 <bauzas> ack too
16:33:06 <fwiesel> If you look at it the way that a test succeeds, then it really fixed, but if it fails, that it could be due to reasons not related to the patch, then it should be fine.
16:33:31 <sean-k-mooney> yep we cant know if a fialure is infra related or not
16:33:47 <sean-k-mooney> but if a previsoly broken functionlity passes we know ti appears to work
16:34:05 <fwiesel> ack
16:34:44 <fwiesel> Tomorrow, I'll make then sure that the index is still correctly updated.
16:35:43 <fwiesel> That's from my side then. Any other questions?
16:36:37 <fwiesel> back to you then, bauzas
16:36:43 <bauzas> cool
16:36:48 <bauzas> #topic Open discussion
16:36:50 <bauzas> .
16:36:56 <bauzas> anything else ?
16:37:22 <sean-k-mooney> are we going to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/902687 and the patch beloew
16:37:40 <sean-k-mooney> you said you wanted to wait until after FF
16:38:05 <sean-k-mooney> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/899753/11 for pyproject.toml supprot need a devstack patch so that can wait until D
16:38:34 <sean-k-mooney> but shall we proceed with the addtion of supprot for wsgi module loading
16:39:12 <bauzas> I'll look at those patches indeed
16:39:23 <sean-k-mooney> cool that was all i wanted to raise
16:39:28 <bauzas> and I'll move those in the etherpad to the bugfixes section
16:40:07 <bauzas> anything else before we close ?
16:40:26 <bauzas> looks not
16:40:31 <bauzas> thanks all
16:40:34 <bauzas> #endmeeting